Robert G. Jahn: Difference between revisions
Goblin Face (talk | contribs) |
Goblin Face (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Park questioned if mind really could influence matter then it would be easy for parapsychologists to measure such a phenomena by using the alleged psychokinetic power to deflect a [[microbalance]] which would not require any dubious [[statistics]] but "the reason, of course, is that the microbalance stubbornly refuses to budge." Park has suggested the reason statistical studies such as Jahn's are so popular in parapsychology is because they introduce opportunities for uncertainty and error which are used to support the biases of the experimenter. Park wrote "no proof of psychic phenomena is ever found. In spite of all the tests devised by parapsychologists like Jahn and [[Dean Radin|Radin]], and huge amounts of data collected over a period of many years, the results are no more convincing today than when they began their experiments."<ref name="Park2000"/> |
Park questioned if mind really could influence matter then it would be easy for parapsychologists to measure such a phenomena by using the alleged psychokinetic power to deflect a [[microbalance]] which would not require any dubious [[statistics]] but "the reason, of course, is that the microbalance stubbornly refuses to budge." Park has suggested the reason statistical studies such as Jahn's are so popular in parapsychology is because they introduce opportunities for uncertainty and error which are used to support the biases of the experimenter. Park wrote "no proof of psychic phenomena is ever found. In spite of all the tests devised by parapsychologists like Jahn and [[Dean Radin|Radin]], and huge amounts of data collected over a period of many years, the results are no more convincing today than when they began their experiments."<ref name="Park2000"/> |
||
According to [[Massimo Pigliucci]] "the PEAR results can be explained without invoking the paranormal because of two well-known problems with this sort of experiment: the difficulty of designing machines capable of generating truly random events and the fact that statistical "significance" is not at all a good measure of the importance or genuineness of a phenomenon."<ref name="Pigliucci2010">[[Massimo Pigliucci]]. (2010). ''Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk''. University of Chicago Press. pp. 77-80. </ref> Pigluicci has written the statistical analysis used by the Jahn and the PEAR group relied on a quantity called a "p-value" but a well known problem with p-values is that if the sample size (number of trials) is very large like PEAR then one is guaranteed to find artificially low p-values indicating a statistical "significant" result due to small biases in the experimental apparatus.<ref name="Pigliucci2010"/> |
|||
==Publications== |
==Publications== |
||
Revision as of 03:54, 6 March 2014
Robert G. Jahn | |
|---|---|
| Born | Robert G. Jahn 1 April 1930 |
| Nationality | American |
| Citizenship | United States of America |
| Alma mater | Princeton University |
| Known for | Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab, Electrically powered spacecraft propulsion |
| Awards | Curtis W. McGraw Research Award, Honorary Doctor of Science degree from Andhra University |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Physics, Parapsychology |
| Institutions | Lehigh University, California Institute of Technology, Princeton University. |
Robert G. Jahn, Ph.D. (born April 1, 1930) is a retired American plasma physicist, Professor of Aerospace Science, and Dean of Engineering at Princeton University. Jahn was also a founder of the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab (PEAR), a parapsychology research program which ran from 1979 to 2007.
Early Career
Jahn holds a B.S.E. degree in Engineering Physics (1951), a M.A. Degree in Physics (1953), and a Ph.D. degree in Physics (1955), all from Princeton University, and has held faculty positions in Physics Department at Lehigh University, at the California Institute of Technology, and, since 1962, at Princeton.
During his career, Jahn worked on electrically powered spacecraft propulsion and directed several major research programs in advanced aerospace propulsion systems, in cooperation with NASA and the U.S. Air Force. In 1961, he founded the Electric Propulsion and Plasma Dynamics Laboratory at Princeton and directed it for more than three decades. He served as Dean of the School of Engineering and Applied Science at Princeton from 1971 - 1986.
Parapsychology Studies
Jahn also engaged in the study of psychokinesis for many years. With Brenda Dunne, he established the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab (PEAR) in 1979 following an undergraduate project to study purported low-level psychokinetic effects on electronic random event generators. Over the years, Jahn and Dunne claim to have created a wealth of small-physical-scale, statistically significant results that they claim suggested direct causal relationships between subjects' intention and otherwise random results.[1]
Experiments under Jahn's purview also explored remote viewing and other topics in parapsychology. In 1982, at the invitation of the editors of Proceedings of the IEEE, Jahn published a comprehensive review of psychic phenomena from an engineering perspective.[2] Statistical flaws in his work have been proposed by others in the parapsychological community and within the general scientific community.[3] Jahn's PEAR lab closed in 2007.[4]
Honors and Awards
Jahn is a Fellow of the American Physical Society and of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and has been chairman of the AIAA Electric Propulsion Technical Committee, associate editor of the AIAA Journal, and a member of the NASA Space Science and Technology Advisory Committee|Space Science and Technology Advisory Committee. He is vice President of the Society for Scientific Exploration and Chairman of the Board of the International Consciousness Research Laboratories consortium. He has been a long-term member of the Board of Directors of Hercules, Inc. and chairman of its Technology Committee, and a member and chairman of the Board of Trustees of Associated Universities, Inc. He has received the Curtis W. McGraw Research Award of the American Society for Engineering Education and an honorary Doctor of Science degree from Andhra University.[5]
He has authored two textbooks, Margins of Reality: The Role of Consciousness in the Physical World (with B.J. Dunne) and Physics of Electric Propulsion, as well as several hundred publications in various technical fields. Many of Jahn's papers on parapsychology appear in the Journal of Scientific Exploration and similar publications that focus primarily upon fringe science.
Reception
The psychokinesis experiments of Jahn which involved "random machines" produced "a very small effect" not large enough to be observed over a brief experiment but over a large number of trials was able to produce a tiny statistical deviation from chance. The physicist Robert L. Park wrote it was not clear if any of the machines used were random and there are no truly random machines, therefore it was possible that the lack of randomness only began to show up after many trials.[6]
Park questioned if mind really could influence matter then it would be easy for parapsychologists to measure such a phenomena by using the alleged psychokinetic power to deflect a microbalance which would not require any dubious statistics but "the reason, of course, is that the microbalance stubbornly refuses to budge." Park has suggested the reason statistical studies such as Jahn's are so popular in parapsychology is because they introduce opportunities for uncertainty and error which are used to support the biases of the experimenter. Park wrote "no proof of psychic phenomena is ever found. In spite of all the tests devised by parapsychologists like Jahn and Radin, and huge amounts of data collected over a period of many years, the results are no more convincing today than when they began their experiments."[6]
According to Massimo Pigliucci "the PEAR results can be explained without invoking the paranormal because of two well-known problems with this sort of experiment: the difficulty of designing machines capable of generating truly random events and the fact that statistical "significance" is not at all a good measure of the importance or genuineness of a phenomenon."[7] Pigluicci has written the statistical analysis used by the Jahn and the PEAR group relied on a quantity called a "p-value" but a well known problem with p-values is that if the sample size (number of trials) is very large like PEAR then one is guaranteed to find artificially low p-values indicating a statistical "significant" result due to small biases in the experimental apparatus.[7]
Publications
- The Role of Consciousness in the Physical World (1981)
- Consciousness and the Source of Reality: The PEAR Odyssey (2011)
- Physics of Electric Propulsion (2012)
- Quirks of the Quantum Mind (2012)
See also
References
- ^ Jahn, R.G. (1986). "On the Quantum Mechanics of Consciousness with Application to Anomalous Phenomena". Foundations of Physics. 18 (6): 721–772.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^ Robert G. Jahn. (1982). The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE. Volume 70: 136-170.
- ^ George P. Hansen, Jessica Utts, Betty Markwick. (1992). Critique of the Pear Remote-Viewing Experiments. Journal of Parapsychology. Volume 56, No. 2. pp. 97-113.
- ^ A Princeton Lab on ESP Plans to Close Its Doors
- ^ Robert Jahn at Princeton University
- ^ a b Robert L. Park. (2000). Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. Oxford University Press. pp. 198-200. ISBN 0-19-860443-2
- ^ a b Massimo Pigliucci. (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. University of Chicago Press. pp. 77-80.
External links
