Jump to content

Aereo: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Expansion plans: section rename
→Legal controversy: splitting up into sections by chronology.
Line 73: Line 73:
Aereo had planned to launch in Chicago on September 13,<ref>{{cite web|title=Aereo Will Expand Into Utah On August 19|url=http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/22/aereo-will-expand-into-utah-on-august-19/}}</ref> but as of February 28, 2014, Aereo was still telling potential Chicago users the service was in Beta with no definite date of launch.<ref>Tweet from @AereoSupport - https://twitter.com/AereoSupport/statuses/381072110514225152</ref>
Aereo had planned to launch in Chicago on September 13,<ref>{{cite web|title=Aereo Will Expand Into Utah On August 19|url=http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/22/aereo-will-expand-into-utah-on-august-19/}}</ref> but as of February 28, 2014, Aereo was still telling potential Chicago users the service was in Beta with no definite date of launch.<ref>Tweet from @AereoSupport - https://twitter.com/AereoSupport/statuses/381072110514225152</ref>


==TV broadcasters vs Areo==
==Legal controversy==
===Federal court===
On March 1, 2012, Aereo was sued by a consortium of network broadcasters who argued that Aereo infringed their copyrighted material because Aereo's streams constituted public performances. They sought a preliminary injunction against the company.<ref name=BroadcastersSue>{{cite web|last=King|first=Cecilia|title=Broadcasters sue to stop Diller’s Aereo streaming TV service|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/broadcasters-sue-to-stop-dillers-aereo-streaming-tv-service/2012/03/01/gIQAsvHmlR_blog.html|publisher=Washington Post|accessdate=1 March 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Stewart|first=Christopher|title=Networks Sue Aereo Streaming Start-Up|url=http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203753704577255911262609628.html?mg=reno-wsj|publisher=Wall Street Journal|accessdate=1 March 2012}}</ref> On July 11, Federal Judge Alison Nathan denied this injunction, citing as precedent the [[Cartoon Network, LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc.|2008 Cablevision case]], which established the legality of cloud-based streaming and DVR services.<ref>{{cite web|last=Kramer|first=Staci|title=Diller and Aereo win first round: injunction denied|url=http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/diller-and-aereo-win-first-round-injunction-denied/|publisher=PaidContent|accessdate=11 July 2012}}</ref> In response to the decision, Aereo Founder and CEO Chet Kanojia said “Today’s decision shows that when you are on the right side of the law, you can stand up, fight the Goliath and win.”<ref>{{cite web|title=AEREO PREVAILS IN PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PROCEEDING|url=https://aereo.com/assets/marketing/mediakit/press_release_7-11.pdf}}</ref> In a subsequent interview with CNET, Kanojia asserted, “With one step, we changed the entire TV industry. The television industry and its evolution are now starting towards the Internet and that was stopped until Aereo came along...And I think as consumers start migrating to the Internet, new programming and new content are going to come in.” <ref>{{cite web|last=Sandoval|first=Greg|title=Aereo's founder has broadcast TV in a headlock--now what? (Q&A)|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57475141-93/aereos-founder-has-broadcast-tv-in-a-headlock-now-what-q-a/|publisher=CNET}}</ref> The plaintiffs appealed the decision to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit]]. Several other players in the industry, such as cable provider Cablevision, the [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]], and the [[Consumer Electronics Association]] filed [[Amicus curiae|amicus]] briefs.<ref>{{cite web|last=Grotticelli|first=Michael|title=Aereo gets support in legal case against broadcasters|url=http://broadcastengineering.com/company-news/aereo-gets-support-legal-case-against-broadcasters|publisher=BroadcastEngineering|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref>
On March 1, 2012, Aereo was sued by a consortium of network broadcasters who argued that Aereo infringed their copyrighted material because Aereo's streams constituted public performances. They sought a preliminary injunction against the company.<ref name=BroadcastersSue>{{cite web|last=King|first=Cecilia|title=Broadcasters sue to stop Diller’s Aereo streaming TV service|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/broadcasters-sue-to-stop-dillers-aereo-streaming-tv-service/2012/03/01/gIQAsvHmlR_blog.html|publisher=Washington Post|accessdate=1 March 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Stewart|first=Christopher|title=Networks Sue Aereo Streaming Start-Up|url=http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203753704577255911262609628.html?mg=reno-wsj|publisher=Wall Street Journal|accessdate=1 March 2012}}</ref> On July 11, Federal Judge Alison Nathan denied this injunction, citing as precedent the [[Cartoon Network, LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc.|2008 Cablevision case]], which established the legality of cloud-based streaming and DVR services.<ref>{{cite web|last=Kramer|first=Staci|title=Diller and Aereo win first round: injunction denied|url=http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/diller-and-aereo-win-first-round-injunction-denied/|publisher=PaidContent|accessdate=11 July 2012}}</ref> In response to the decision, Aereo Founder and CEO Chet Kanojia said “Today’s decision shows that when you are on the right side of the law, you can stand up, fight the Goliath and win.”<ref>{{cite web|title=AEREO PREVAILS IN PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PROCEEDING|url=https://aereo.com/assets/marketing/mediakit/press_release_7-11.pdf}}</ref> In a subsequent interview with CNET, Kanojia asserted, “With one step, we changed the entire TV industry. The television industry and its evolution are now starting towards the Internet and that was stopped until Aereo came along...And I think as consumers start migrating to the Internet, new programming and new content are going to come in.” <ref>{{cite web|last=Sandoval|first=Greg|title=Aereo's founder has broadcast TV in a headlock--now what? (Q&A)|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57475141-93/aereos-founder-has-broadcast-tv-in-a-headlock-now-what-q-a/|publisher=CNET}}</ref>

===Second circuit appeal===
The plaintiffs appealed the decision to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit]]. Several other players in the industry, such as cable provider Cablevision, the [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]], and the [[Consumer Electronics Association]] filed [[Amicus curiae|amicus]] briefs.<ref>{{cite web|last=Grotticelli|first=Michael|title=Aereo gets support in legal case against broadcasters|url=http://broadcastengineering.com/company-news/aereo-gets-support-legal-case-against-broadcasters|publisher=BroadcastEngineering|accessdate=31 October 2012}}</ref>


Cable companies are required by the 1992 [[Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act]] to negotiate for [[retransmission consent]], usually paying broadcasters for the right to carry their signals. Broadcasters argued that Aereo was a threat both to their business model, by undermining the cable re-transmission fees and the size of their audience.<ref>{{cite web|last=Kang|first=Cecelia|title=As users flock to iTunes, Hulu and Netflix, TV stations struggle to survive|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/as-users-flock-to-itunes-hulu-and-netflix-tv-stations-struggle-to-survie/2012/04/23/gIQAqc9CcT_story.html|publisher=Washington Post|accessdate=23 April 2012}}</ref> Because the fees cable companies pay for broadcast content can comprise up to 10% of a broadcaster's revenue,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://seekingalpha.com/article/902241-cbs-keeps-broadcast-profitable-atop-retransmission-syndication-fees-for-now |title=CBS Keeps Broadcast Profitable Atop Retransmission, Syndication Fees ... For Now |publisher=Seeking Alpha |date=2012-10-03 |accessdate=2013-05-07}}</ref> broadcasters object to Aereo's re-distribution of this content without paying any fees. Broadcasters have also identified Aereo as part of the [[Cord cutter|cord-cutting]] trend among TV audiences that poses a threat to broadcasters' advertising revenue.<ref name="CNET bet">{{cite web|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57446130-93/a-bet-that-diller-backed-aereo-tv-startup-wins-its-day-in-court/|title=A bet that Diller-backed Aereo TV startup wins its day in court|last=Sandoval|first=Greg|publisher=CNET|date=3 June 2012|accessdate=7 December 2012}}</ref>
Cable companies are required by the 1992 [[Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act]] to negotiate for [[retransmission consent]], usually paying broadcasters for the right to carry their signals. Broadcasters argued that Aereo was a threat both to their business model, by undermining the cable re-transmission fees and the size of their audience.<ref>{{cite web|last=Kang|first=Cecelia|title=As users flock to iTunes, Hulu and Netflix, TV stations struggle to survive|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/as-users-flock-to-itunes-hulu-and-netflix-tv-stations-struggle-to-survie/2012/04/23/gIQAqc9CcT_story.html|publisher=Washington Post|accessdate=23 April 2012}}</ref> Because the fees cable companies pay for broadcast content can comprise up to 10% of a broadcaster's revenue,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://seekingalpha.com/article/902241-cbs-keeps-broadcast-profitable-atop-retransmission-syndication-fees-for-now |title=CBS Keeps Broadcast Profitable Atop Retransmission, Syndication Fees ... For Now |publisher=Seeking Alpha |date=2012-10-03 |accessdate=2013-05-07}}</ref> broadcasters object to Aereo's re-distribution of this content without paying any fees. Broadcasters have also identified Aereo as part of the [[Cord cutter|cord-cutting]] trend among TV audiences that poses a threat to broadcasters' advertising revenue.<ref name="CNET bet">{{cite web|url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57446130-93/a-bet-that-diller-backed-aereo-tv-startup-wins-its-day-in-court/|title=A bet that Diller-backed Aereo TV startup wins its day in court|last=Sandoval|first=Greg|publisher=CNET|date=3 June 2012|accessdate=7 December 2012}}</ref>
Line 82: Line 86:
Complicating the issue is the fact that the [[United States District Court for the Central District of California|U.S. District Court for the Central District of California]] granted an injunction against Aereo's rival [[FilmOn]], a similar service. However, the district court's injunction is only legally binding in its jurisdiction (including the West Coast of the continental United States, Alaska and Hawaii) and is currently being appealed to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals]]. Other competitors have been blocked from providing service in Los Angeles and Seattle by similar injunctions.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.fierceonlinevideo.com/story/aereo-amid-challenges-looks-ahead-possibilities/2013-08-28 | title=Aereo, amid challenges, looks ahead to possibilities | date=August 28, 2013 | accessdate=September 27, 2013}}</ref>
Complicating the issue is the fact that the [[United States District Court for the Central District of California|U.S. District Court for the Central District of California]] granted an injunction against Aereo's rival [[FilmOn]], a similar service. However, the district court's injunction is only legally binding in its jurisdiction (including the West Coast of the continental United States, Alaska and Hawaii) and is currently being appealed to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals]]. Other competitors have been blocked from providing service in Los Angeles and Seattle by similar injunctions.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.fierceonlinevideo.com/story/aereo-amid-challenges-looks-ahead-possibilities/2013-08-28 | title=Aereo, amid challenges, looks ahead to possibilities | date=August 28, 2013 | accessdate=September 27, 2013}}</ref>


===Supreme court===
In October 2013, the broadcasters filed a petition to the Supreme Court to take up the issue.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.adweek.com/news/television/broadcasters-petition-supreme-court-review-aereo-case-153098 | title=Broadcasters Petition Supreme Court to Review Aereo Case | publisher=Adweek | date=October 11, 2013 | accessdate=November 18, 2013}}</ref> Then on November 17, 2013, the [[National Football League]] and [[Major League Baseball]] filed a joint [[Amicus curiae|Amicus brief]] to the Supreme Court, warning that sports programming would likely migrate from free TV to cable; and that Aereo may put the U.S. in violation of several international treaties that prohibit the retransmission of broadcast signals over the Internet without their copyright holder's consent.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://variety.com/2013/tv/news/nfl-major-league-baseball-warn-supreme-court-that-aereo-could-trigger-end-to-games-on-free-tv-1200847089/ | title=NFL, Major League Baseball Warn That Aereo Could Trigger End of Free TV Game Broadcasts | publisher=Variety | date=November 17, 2013 | accessdate=November 18, 2013}}</ref>
In October 2013, the broadcasters filed a petition to the Supreme Court to take up the issue.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.adweek.com/news/television/broadcasters-petition-supreme-court-review-aereo-case-153098 | title=Broadcasters Petition Supreme Court to Review Aereo Case | publisher=Adweek | date=October 11, 2013 | accessdate=November 18, 2013}}</ref> Then on November 17, 2013, the [[National Football League]] and [[Major League Baseball]] filed a joint [[Amicus curiae|Amicus brief]] to the Supreme Court, warning that sports programming would likely migrate from free TV to cable; and that Aereo may put the U.S. in violation of several international treaties that prohibit the retransmission of broadcast signals over the Internet without their copyright holder's consent.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://variety.com/2013/tv/news/nfl-major-league-baseball-warn-supreme-court-that-aereo-could-trigger-end-to-games-on-free-tv-1200847089/ | title=NFL, Major League Baseball Warn That Aereo Could Trigger End of Free TV Game Broadcasts | publisher=Variety | date=November 17, 2013 | accessdate=November 18, 2013}}</ref>


Revision as of 20:30, 4 March 2014

Aereo
FoundedFebruary 2012 (2012-02)
Headquarters
New York, New York
,
USA
Area served
New York City
Key people
Chet Kanojia (CEO and Founder)
ProductsOver-the-air television on Internet-connected devices
WebsiteOfficial website

Aereo is a technology company based in New York City that allows subscribers to view live as well as time-shifted streams of over-the-air television on Internet-connected devices.[1] The service launched in February 2012[2] and is backed by Barry Diller's IAC.[3]

Two weeks before Aereo's initial launch in New York City, the company was sued for copyright infringement by a consortium of major broadcasters, including CBS, Comcast's NBC, Disney's ABC and 21st Century Fox's Fox.[4] On April 1, 2013, a federal appeals court upheld a lower court's ruling, finding that Aereo’s streams to subscribers were not "public performances", and thus did not constitute copyright infringement. The issue may ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Service

Aereo's technology allows subscribers to view live broadcast content and/or record live broadcasts for viewing later.[5] As of October 2012, Aereo can be used on Windows, Mac, and Linux PCs [6][7] with a compatible browser or iOS devices including the iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch or Apple TV (2nd & 3rd Gen) via AirPlay.[1] Aereo can also be watched using a Roku box via a stand-alone app and, as of January 21, 2013, the updated app allows onscreen navigation with the standard Roku clicker instead of using an iOS device as a remote.[8]

As of June 2012, the service offers 28 channels, including all major broadcast channels. In August 2012, the company announced new monthly and yearly pricing options, $1 a day and 'Aereo Try for Free.' Monthly plans start at $8 for 20 hours of DVR storage, there are also yearly subscriptions.[9]

Aereo provides this service by leasing to each user an individual remote antenna. [5][10][11] This distinguishes Aereo from purely internet-based streaming services.[12]

Availability

The service was originally available to customers in New York City, followed by the Boston area. During times when customers venture out of the normal broadcasting range for network television, they will not be able to access the service.[5]

On January 8, 2013, Aereo CEO Chet Kanojia announced Spring 2013 plans to expand to the following US cities:[13] Markets in bold have service as of January 2014.[14]

Aereo had planned to launch in Chicago on September 13,[15] but as of February 28, 2014, Aereo was still telling potential Chicago users the service was in Beta with no definite date of launch.[16]

TV broadcasters vs Areo

Federal court

On March 1, 2012, Aereo was sued by a consortium of network broadcasters who argued that Aereo infringed their copyrighted material because Aereo's streams constituted public performances. They sought a preliminary injunction against the company.[4][17] On July 11, Federal Judge Alison Nathan denied this injunction, citing as precedent the 2008 Cablevision case, which established the legality of cloud-based streaming and DVR services.[18] In response to the decision, Aereo Founder and CEO Chet Kanojia said “Today’s decision shows that when you are on the right side of the law, you can stand up, fight the Goliath and win.”[19] In a subsequent interview with CNET, Kanojia asserted, “With one step, we changed the entire TV industry. The television industry and its evolution are now starting towards the Internet and that was stopped until Aereo came along...And I think as consumers start migrating to the Internet, new programming and new content are going to come in.” [20]

Second circuit appeal

The plaintiffs appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Several other players in the industry, such as cable provider Cablevision, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Consumer Electronics Association filed amicus briefs.[21]

Cable companies are required by the 1992 Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act to negotiate for retransmission consent, usually paying broadcasters for the right to carry their signals. Broadcasters argued that Aereo was a threat both to their business model, by undermining the cable re-transmission fees and the size of their audience.[22] Because the fees cable companies pay for broadcast content can comprise up to 10% of a broadcaster's revenue,[23] broadcasters object to Aereo's re-distribution of this content without paying any fees. Broadcasters have also identified Aereo as part of the cord-cutting trend among TV audiences that poses a threat to broadcasters' advertising revenue.[24]

On April 1, 2013, the federal appeals court upheld the lower court's ruling, finding that Aereo’s streams to subscribers were not "public performances", and thus did not constitute copyright infringement. The appeals court also affirmed the earlier district court decision that denied the broadcasters a preliminary injunction against Aereo.[25] In response, News Corp's Chief Operating Officer Chase Carey stated that the company is contemplating taking Fox off the air and converting it to a cable-only channel: "We need to be able to be fairly compensated for our content ... we can't sit idly by and let an entity steal our signal. We will move to a subscription model if that's our only recourse."[26] Univision and CBS also stated that they may also follow and convert to cable-only.[27][28]

Complicating the issue is the fact that the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted an injunction against Aereo's rival FilmOn, a similar service. However, the district court's injunction is only legally binding in its jurisdiction (including the West Coast of the continental United States, Alaska and Hawaii) and is currently being appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Other competitors have been blocked from providing service in Los Angeles and Seattle by similar injunctions.[29]

Supreme court

In October 2013, the broadcasters filed a petition to the Supreme Court to take up the issue.[30] Then on November 17, 2013, the National Football League and Major League Baseball filed a joint Amicus brief to the Supreme Court, warning that sports programming would likely migrate from free TV to cable; and that Aereo may put the U.S. in violation of several international treaties that prohibit the retransmission of broadcast signals over the Internet without their copyright holder's consent.[31]

On January 10, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to hear the case. [32] As of February 11th, 2014, the Supreme Court date is set for April 22, 2014 [33]

Reception

Reviews of Aereo have been positive,[34][35][36][37] including one by The Wall Street Journal’s Katherine Boehret, who commented on Aereo’s “clean user interface that works well on iPad...and its video quality is startlingly good,” [1]

PC Magazine complained of the limited channel options and limited availability.[38] It praised the interoperability of the service offered.

References

  1. ^ a b c Boehret, Katherine. "Aereo Shines With Live TV on the Go". Wall Street Journal.
  2. ^ "Aereo Announces $20.5M Series A Financing Led by IAC; New Technology Platform Allows Consumers Access to Live TV Over the Internet".
  3. ^ Stelter, Brian. "New Service Will Stream Local TV Stations in New York". New York Times.
  4. ^ a b King, Cecilia. "Broadcasters sue to stop Diller's Aereo streaming TV service". Washington Post. Retrieved 1 March 2012.
  5. ^ a b c "Aereo is leaving the courts dazed and confused - Fortune Tech". Tech.fortune.cnn.com. 2012-05-21. Retrieved 2013-05-07.
  6. ^ Aereo Browser Viewing
  7. ^ Will Aereo work on Linux
  8. ^ Falcone, John P. (January 24, 2013). "Updated Aereo app adds improved live TV streaming to Roku | Internet & Media - CNET News". News.cnet.com. Retrieved October 10, 2013.
  9. ^ Warren, Christina. "Aereo Makes Cutting the Cord Even Easier, And Cheaper". Mashable. Retrieved 2 August 2012.
  10. ^ Moskovciak, Matthew. "Aereo brings over-the-air TV to the cloud". CNET. Retrieved 14 February 2012.
  11. ^ Stewart, Christopher. "High Noon for Diller's Aereo". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
  12. ^ Fung, Amanda. "Tech startup wheels into ex-tire plant". Crains New York. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
  13. ^ Tuesday, January 8th, 2013 (2013-01-08). "Aereo Raises $38 Million Series B, Plans To Bring Its Streaming TV Service To 22 New Markets". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2013-05-07.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ Horiuchi, Vince (2013-08-15). "Oh My Tech!: Review of new Aereo TV service". The Salt Lake Tribune. MediaNews Group. Retrieved 2013-08-19.
  15. ^ "Aereo Will Expand Into Utah On August 19".
  16. ^ Tweet from @AereoSupport - https://twitter.com/AereoSupport/statuses/381072110514225152
  17. ^ Stewart, Christopher. "Networks Sue Aereo Streaming Start-Up". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 1 March 2012.
  18. ^ Kramer, Staci. "Diller and Aereo win first round: injunction denied". PaidContent. Retrieved 11 July 2012.
  19. ^ "AEREO PREVAILS IN PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PROCEEDING" (PDF). {{cite web}}: horizontal tab character in |title= at position 6 (help)
  20. ^ Sandoval, Greg. "Aereo's founder has broadcast TV in a headlock--now what? (Q&A)". CNET.
  21. ^ Grotticelli, Michael. "Aereo gets support in legal case against broadcasters". BroadcastEngineering. Retrieved 31 October 2012.
  22. ^ Kang, Cecelia. "As users flock to iTunes, Hulu and Netflix, TV stations struggle to survive". Washington Post. Retrieved 23 April 2012.
  23. ^ "CBS Keeps Broadcast Profitable Atop Retransmission, Syndication Fees ... For Now". Seeking Alpha. 2012-10-03. Retrieved 2013-05-07.
  24. ^ Sandoval, Greg (3 June 2012). "A bet that Diller-backed Aereo TV startup wins its day in court". CNET. Retrieved 7 December 2012.
  25. ^ Stelter, Brian (April 1, 2013). "Aereo Wins Appeal; Trial Likely for Streaming TV". New York Times. Retrieved April 1, 2013.
  26. ^ "News Corp to Take Fox Off Air If Courts Back Aereo". Bloomberg. April 8, 2013. Retrieved April 10, 2013.
  27. ^ "Aereo could bring down broadcast TV". CNN Money. April 9, 2013. Retrieved April 10, 2013.
  28. ^ "CBS Says It Could Move To Cable In A 'Few Days' If Aereo Wins; Receives Several Offers To Help Pack Its Bags". Techdirt.com. May 1, 2013. Retrieved May 6, 2013.
  29. ^ "Aereo, amid challenges, looks ahead to possibilities". August 28, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2013.
  30. ^ "Broadcasters Petition Supreme Court to Review Aereo Case". Adweek. October 11, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
  31. ^ "NFL, Major League Baseball Warn That Aereo Could Trigger End of Free TV Game Broadcasts". Variety. November 17, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
  32. ^ http://variety.com/2014/biz/news/supreme-court-to-hear-aereo-case-1201037308/
  33. ^ http://venturebeat.com/2014/02/11/supreme-court-to-hear-aereo-vs-big-media-case-april-22/
  34. ^ Wice, Nathaniel. "A Cord Cutter's Dream Come True". Barrons. Retrieved 24 March 2012.
  35. ^ Deleon, Nicholas. "MIXED SIGNALS Streaming TV startup Aereo, bane of broadcast networks, gets it mostly right". The Daily. Retrieved 17 July 2012.
  36. ^ Aguilar, Mario. "Aereo Hands-On: Watch Broadcast TV Wherever and Whenever You Want". Gizmodo. Retrieved 14 March 2012.
  37. ^ Warren, Christina. "Aereo Gives New Yorkers Online Access to Live TV [HANDS ON]". Mashable. Retrieved 28 February 2012.
  38. ^ Greenwald, Will. "Aereo Review & Rating". PCMag.com. Retrieved 2013-05-07.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aereo&oldid=598156031"