Jump to content

Animal Farm: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎Significance and allegory: Typo fixing and cleanup, typos fixed: rottten → rotten using AWB (8414)
No edit summary
Line 141: Line 141:
}}
}}


Orwell encountered great difficulty getting the manuscript published, as it was feared that the book might upset the alliance between the US, UK and the Soviet Union. Four publishers refused; one had initially accepted the work but declined after consulting the [[Ministry of Information (United Kingdom)|Ministry of Information]].{{sfn|Dag|2004|p=}}<ref>[[#GOIT|Orwell 1976 page 25 ''La libertà di stampa'']]</ref> Eventually [[Secker and Warburg]] published the first edition in 1945.


== Significance and allegory ==
== Significance and allegory ==
Line 159: Line 158:


== Efforts to find a publisher ==
== Efforts to find a publisher ==
Orwell encountered great difficulty getting the manuscript published, as it was feared that the book might upset the alliance between the US, UK and the Soviet Union. Four publishers refused; one had initially accepted the work but declined after consulting the [[Ministry of Information (United Kingdom)|Ministry of Information]].{{sfn|Dag|2004|p=}}<ref>[[#GOIT|Orwell 1976 page 25 ''La libertà di stampa'']]</ref> Eventually [[Secker and Warburg]] published the first edition in 1945.
During [[World War II]], it became apparent to Orwell that anti-Soviet literature was not something which most major publishing houses would touch&nbsp;— including his regular publisher [[Victor Gollancz Ltd|Gollancz]]. He also submitted the manuscript to [[Faber and Faber]], where the poet [[T. S. Eliot]] (who was a director of the firm) also rejected it; Eliot wrote back to Orwell praising its "good writing" and "fundamental integrity" but declaring that they would only accept it for publication if they had some sympathy for the viewpoint "which I take to be generally [[Deformed workers' state|Trotskyite]]". Eliot said he found the view "not convincing", and contended that the pigs were made out to be the best to run the farm; he posited that someone might argue "what was needed .. was not more communism but more public-spirited pigs".<ref name="Eliot" /><ref>{{cite news|url=http://archive.timesonline.co.uk/tol/viewArticle.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1969-01-06-09-004&pageId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1969-01-06-09|title=T.S. Eliot and Animal Farm: Reasons for Rejection|last=Eliot|first=Valery|date=6 January 1969|work=The Times |location=UK |accessdate=8 April 2009 }}</ref>

During [[World War II]], it became apparent to Orwell that anti-Soviet literature was not something which most major publishing houses would touch&nbsp;— including his regular publisher [[Victor Gollancz Ltd|Gollancz]]. He also submitted the manuscript to [[Faber and Faber]], where the poet [[T. S. Eliot]] (who was a director of the firm) rejected it; Eliot wrote back to Orwell praising its "good writing" and "fundamental integrity" but declared that they would only accept it for publication if they had some sympathy for the viewpoint "which I take to be generally [[Deformed workers' state|Trotskyite]]". Eliot said he found the view "not convincing", and contended that the pigs were made out to be the best to run the farm; he posited that someone might argue "what was needed .. was not more communism but more public-spirited pigs".<ref name="Eliot" /><ref>{{cite news|url=http://archive.timesonline.co.uk/tol/viewArticle.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1969-01-06-09-004&pageId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1969-01-06-09|title=T.S. Eliot and Animal Farm: Reasons for Rejection|last=Eliot|first=Valery|date=6 January 1969|work=The Times |location=UK |accessdate=8 April 2009 }}</ref>


The publisher [[Jonathan Cape]], who had initially accepted ''Animal Farm'', subsequently rejected his book after an official at the British [[UK Ministry of Information|Ministry of Information]] warned him off<ref name="bbc" />&nbsp;— although the civil servant who it is assumed gave the order was later found to be a [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[spy]].{{sfn|Taylor|2003|p=337}} Writing to Leonard Moore, a partner in the literary agency of Christy & Moore, publisher Jonathan Cape "explained that the decision had been taken on the advice of a senior official in the Ministry of Information. Such flagrant anti-Soviet bias was unacceptable: and the choice of pigs as the dominant class was thought to be especially offensive. The 'important official' was, or so it may reasonably be assumed, a man named [[Peter Smollett]], later unmasked as a Soviet agent." Born Hans Peter Smolka in Vienna in 1912, he became a naturalized British subject in 1938, changed his name, and after the outbreak of WW2 joined the Ministry of Information where he organised pro-Soviet propaganda - Smollett's family has vigorously denied suggestions he was a spy.<ref>Orwell Subverted, Daniel J.Leab, Penn State Press, 2007 p.3</ref> The publisher then wrote to Orwell, saying:<ref name="bbc" />
The publisher [[Jonathan Cape]], who had initially accepted ''Animal Farm'', subsequently rejected his book after an official at the British [[UK Ministry of Information|Ministry of Information]] warned him off<ref name="bbc" />&nbsp;— although the civil servant who it is assumed gave the order was later found to be a [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[spy]].{{sfn|Taylor|2003|p=337}} Writing to Leonard Moore, a partner in the literary agency of Christy & Moore, publisher Jonathan Cape "explained that the decision had been taken on the advice of a senior official in the Ministry of Information. Such flagrant anti-Soviet bias was unacceptable: and the choice of pigs as the dominant class was thought to be especially offensive. The 'important official' was, or so it may reasonably be assumed, a man named [[Peter Smollett]], later unmasked as a Soviet agent." Born Hans Peter Smolka in Vienna in 1912, he became a naturalized British subject in 1938, changed his name, and after the outbreak of WW2 joined the Ministry of Information where he organised pro-Soviet propaganda - Smollett's family has vigorously denied suggestions he was a spy.<ref>Orwell Subverted, Daniel J.Leab, Penn State Press, 2007 p.3</ref> The publisher then wrote to Orwell, saying:<ref name="bbc" />
Line 168: Line 169:
Another thing: it would be less offensive if the predominant caste in the fable were not pigs. I think the choice of pigs as the ruling caste will no doubt give offense to many people, and particularly to anyone who is a bit touchy, as undoubtedly the Russians are.
Another thing: it would be less offensive if the predominant caste in the fable were not pigs. I think the choice of pigs as the ruling caste will no doubt give offense to many people, and particularly to anyone who is a bit touchy, as undoubtedly the Russians are.
}}
}}

[[Frederic Warburg]] too, faced pressures against publication, even from people in his own office, and from his wife Pamela, who felt that it was not the moment for ingratitude towards Stalin and the heroic [[Red Army]]. <ref> ''George Orwell, A Personal Memoir'', T.R.Fyvel, p.139 </ref> who had played a major part in defeating Hitler.


== "The Freedom of the Press" ==
== "The Freedom of the Press" ==

Revision as of 00:49, 2 November 2012

Animal Farm
First edition cover
AuthorGeorge Orwell
Original titleAnimal Farm: A Fairy Story
LanguageEnglish
GenreClassics, satire, educational animation
PublisherSecker and Warburg (London)
Publication date
17 August 1945
Publication placeUnited Kingdom
Media typePrint (hardback & paperback)
Pages112 pp (UK paperback edition)
ISBNISBN 0-452-28424-4 (present) ISBN 978-0-452-28424-1 Parameter error in {{ISBNT}}: invalid character
OCLC53163540
823/.912 20
LC ClassPR6029.R8 A63 2003b
Preceded byThe Lion And The Unicorn 
Followed byNineteen Eighty-Four 

Animal Farm is an allegorical novella by George Orwell published in England on 17 August 1945. According to Orwell, the book reflects events leading up to and during the Stalin era before the Second World War. Orwell, a democratic socialist,[1] was a critic of Joseph Stalin and hostile to Moscow-directed Stalinism, especially after his experiences with the NKVD and the Spanish Civil War.[2] In a letter to Yvonne Davet, Orwell described Animal Farm as his novel "contre Stalin".[3]

The original title was Animal Farm: A Fairy Story, but the subtitle was dropped by U.S. publishers for its 1946 publication and subsequently all but one of the translations during Orwell's lifetime omitted the addition. Other variations in the title include: A Satire and A Contemporary Satire.[3] Orwell suggested the title Union des républiques socialistes animales for the French translation, which recalled the French name of the Soviet Union, Union des républiques socialistes soviétiques, and which abbreviates to URSA, the Latin for "bear", a symbol of Russia.[3]

Time magazine chose the book as one of the 100 best English-language novels (1923 to 2005);[4] it also places at number 31 on the Modern Library List of Best 20th-Century Novels. It won a Retrospective Hugo Award in 1996 and is also included in the Great Books of the Western World.

The novel addresses not only the corruption of the revolution by its leaders but also how wickedness, indifference, ignorance, greed and myopia corrupt the revolution. It portrays corrupt leadership as the flaw in revolution, rather than the act of revolution itself. It also shows how potential ignorance and indifference to problems within a revolution could allow horrors to happen if a smooth transition to a people's government is not achieved.

Plot summary

Snowball's revolution

Old Major, the old boar on the Manor Farm, calls the animals on the farm for a meeting, where he compares the humans to parasites and teaches the animals a revolutionary song, 'Beasts of England'. When Major dies, two young pigs, Snowball and Napoleon, assume command and turn his dream into a philosophy. The animals revolt and drive the drunken and irresponsible Mr Jones from the farm, renaming it "Animal Farm". They adopt Seven Commandments of Animal-ism, the most important of which is, "All animals are equal".

Snowball attempts to teach the animals reading and writing; food is plentiful, and the farm runs smoothly. The pigs elevate themselves to positions of leadership and set aside special food items, ostensibly for their personal health. Napoleon takes the pups from the farm dogs and trains them privately. Napoleon and Snowball struggle for leadership. When Snowball announces his plans to build a windmill, Napoleon has his dogs chase Snowball away and declares himself leader.

Napoleon's rule

Napoleon enacts changes to the governance structure of the farm, replacing meetings with a committee of pigs, who will run the farm. Using a young pig named Squealer as a "mouthpiece", Napoleon claims credit for the windmill idea. The animals work harder with the promise of easier lives with the windmill. After a violent storm, the animals find the windmill annihilated. Napoleon and Squealer convince the animals that Snowball destroyed it, although the scorn of the neighbouring farmers suggests that its walls were too thin.

Once Snowball becomes a scapegoat, Napoleon begins purging the farm with his dogs, killing animals he accuses of consorting with his old rival. He and the pigs abuse their power, imposing more control while reserving privileges for themselves and rewriting history, villainising Snowball and glorifying Napoleon. Squealer justifies every statement Napoleon makes, even the pigs' alteration of the Seven Commandments of Animalism to benefit themselves. 'Beasts of England' is replaced by an anthem glorifying Napoleon, who appears to be adopting the lifestyle of a man. The animals remain convinced that they are better off than they were when under Mr Jones. Squealer abuses the animals' poor memories and invents numbers to show their improvement.

Mr Frederick, one of the neighbouring farmers, attacks the farm, using blasting powder to blow up the restored windmill. Though the animals win the battle, they do so at great cost, as many, including Boxer the workhorse, are wounded. Despite his injuries, Boxer continues working harder and harder, until he collapses while working on the windmill. Napoleon sends for a van to take Boxer to the veterinary surgeon's, explaining that better care can be given there. Benjamin, the cynical donkey, who "could read as well as any pig",[5] notices that the van belongs to a knacker, and attempts to mount a rescue; but the animals' attempts are futile. Squealer reports that the van was purchased by the hospital and the writing from the previous owner had not been repainted. He recounts a tale of Boxer's death in the hands of the best medical care.

Humanisation

Years pass, and the pigs learn to walk upright, carry whips and wear clothes. The Seven Commandments are reduced to a single phrase: "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others". Napoleon holds a dinner party for the pigs and the humans of the area, who congratulate Napoleon on having the hardest-working but least fed animals in the country. Napoleon announces an alliance with the humans, against the labouring classes of both "worlds". He abolishes practices and traditions related to the Revolution, and changes the name of the farm to "The Manor Farm".

The animals, overhearing the conversation, notice that the faces of the pigs have begun changing. During a poker match, an argument breaks out between Napoleon and Mr Pilkington, and the animals realise that the faces of the pigs look like the faces of humans, and no one can tell the difference between them.

Animalism

The pigs Snowball, Napoleon, and Squealer adapt Old Major's ideas into an actual philosophy, which they formally name Animalism. Soon after, Napoleon and Squealer indulge in the vices of humans (drinking alcohol, sleeping in beds, trading). Squealer is employed to alter the Seven Commandments to account for this humanisation, an allusion to the Soviet government's revising of history in order to exercise control of the people's beliefs about themselves and their society.[6]

The original commandments are:

  1. Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
  2. Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
  3. No animal shall wear clothes.
  4. No animal shall sleep in a bed.
  5. No animal shall drink alcohol.
  6. No animal shall kill any other animal.
  7. All animals are equal.

Later, Napoleon and his pigs secretly revise some commandments to clear them of accusations of law-breaking (such as "No animal shall drink alcohol" having "to excess" appended to it and "No animal shall sleep in a bed" with "with sheets" added to it). The changed commandments are as follows, with the changes bolded:

  • 4 No animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets.
  • 5 No animal shall drink alcohol to excess.
  • 6 No animal shall kill any other animal without cause.

Eventually these are replaced with the maxims, "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others", and "Four legs good, two legs better!" as the pigs become more human. This is an ironic twist to the original purpose of the Seven Commandments, which were supposed to keep order within Animal Farm by uniting the animals together against the humans, and prevent animals from following the humans' evil habits. Through the revision of the commandments, Orwell demonstrates how simply political dogma can be turned into malleable propaganda.[7]

Characters

Pigs

Old Major – An aged prize Middle White boar provides the inspiration that fuels the Rebellion in the book. He is an allegory of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, the founders of communism, in that he draws up the principles of the revolution. His skull being put on revered public display also recalls Lenin, whose embalmed body was put on display.[8][9]

Napoleon – "A large, rather fierce-looking Berkshire boar, the only Berkshire on the farm, not much of a talker, but with a reputation for getting his own way",[10] An allegory of Joseph Stalin,[8] Napoleon is the main villain of Animal Farm. In the first French version of Animal Farm, Napoleon is called César, the French form of Caesar,[3] although another translation has him as Napoléon.[11]

Snowball – Napoleon's rival and original head of the farm after Jones' overthrow. He is mainly based on Leon Trotsky,[8] but also combines elements from Vladimir Lenin.[9]

Squealer – A small white fat porker who serves as Napoleon's right hand pig and minister of propaganda, holding a position similar to that of Molotov.[8]

Minimus – A poetic pig who writes the second and third national anthems of Animal Farm after the singing of "Beasts of England" is banned.

The Piglets – Hinted to be the children of Napoleon (albeit not explicitly stated) and are the first generation of animals actually subjugated to his idea of animal inequality.

The young pigs – Four pigs who complain about Napoleon's takeover of the farm but are quickly silenced and later executed.

Pinkeye – A minor pig who is mentioned only once; he is the pig that tastes Napoleon's food to make sure it is not poisoned, in response to rumours about an assassination attempt on Napoleon.

Humans

Mr Jones – The former owner of the farm, Jones is a very heavy drinker. The animals revolt against him after he drinks so much that he does not feed or take care of them.

Mr Frederick – The tough owner of Pinchfield, a well-kept neighbouring farm, who briefly enters into an "alliance" with Napoleon, represents Germany.

Mr Pilkington – The easy-going but crafty owner of Foxwood, a neighbouring farm overgrown with weeds, represents Britain.

Mr Whymper – A man hired by Napoleon for the public relations of Animal Farm to human society, who is eventually used to procure luxuries like alcohol for the pigs.

Equines

Boxer – Boxer is a loyal, kind, dedicated, and respectable horse, although quite dim-witted.

Clover – Boxer's companion, constantly caring for him; she also acts as a matriarch of sorts for the other horses and the other animals in general.

Mollie – Mollie is a self-centred, self-indulgent and vain young white mare who quickly leaves for another farm after the revolution.

Benjamin – Benjamin, a donkey, is one of the oldest animals. He has the worst temper, but is also one of the wisest animals on the farm, and is one of the few who can actually read. He is skeptical and pessimistic, his most-often-made statement being "Life will go on as it has always gone on – that is, badly."[12] The academic Morris Dickstein has suggested there is ' a touch of Orwell himself in this creature's timeless scepticism.' [13]

Other animals

Muriel – A wise old goat who is friends with all of the animals on the farm. She, like Benjamin and Snowball, is one of the few animals on the farm who can read.

The Puppies – Offspring of Jessie and Bluebell, taken away from them by Napoleon at birth and reared by Napoleon to be his security force.

Moses – An old raven who occasionally visits the farm, regaling its denizens with tales of a wondrous place beyond the clouds called Sugarcandy Mountain, where he avers that all animals go when they die—but only if they work hard. Orwell portrays religion as 'the black raven of priestcraft - promising pie in the sky when you die, and faithfully serving whoever happens to be in power. The raven 'was Mr.Jones's especial pet, was a spy and a tale-bearer, but he was also a clever talker.' When the revolution turns conservative and nationalistic, Napoleon brings the raven back, as Stalin brought back the Russian Orthodox Church. " [14]

The Sheep – They show limited understanding of the situations but nonetheless blindly support Napoleon's ideals. They represent blind conformity.

The Hens – The hens are among the first to rebel against Napoleon.

The Cows – Their milk is stolen by the pigs, who learn to milk them, and is stirred into the pigs' mash every day while the other animals are denied such luxuries.

The Cat – Never seen to carry out any work, the cat is absent for long periods, and is forgiven because her excuses are so convincing and she "purred so affectionately that it was impossible not to believe in her good intentions".[15] She has no interest in the politics of the farm, and the only time she is recorded as having participated in an election, she is found to have actually "voted on both sides".[15]

Origin

George Orwell wrote the manuscript in 1943 and 1944 subsequent to his experiences during the Spanish Civil War, which he described in his 1938 Homage to Catalonia. In the preface of a 1947 Ukrainian edition of Animal Farm, he explained how escaping the communist purges in Spain taught him "how easily totalitarian propaganda can control the opinion of enlightened people in democratic countries." This motivated Orwell to expose and strongly condemn what he saw as the Stalinist corruption of the original socialist ideals.[16]

Immediately prior to his writing, the Ministry of Information had put out a booklet for propagandists with instructions on how to quell ideological fears of the Soviet Union, which included directions to claim that the Red Terror was a figment of Nazi imagination, and Orwell had quit the BBC.[17]

In that preface, Orwell also described what gave him the idea of setting the book on a farm:[16]

...I saw a little boy, perhaps ten years old, driving a huge carthorse along a narrow path, whipping it whenever it tried to turn. It struck me that if only such animals became aware of their strength we should have no power over them, and that men exploit animals in much the same way as the rich exploit the proletariat.


Significance and allegory

The Horn and Hoof Flag described in the book appears to be based on the hammer and sickle.

In the Eastern Bloc both Animal Farm and later, also Nineteen Eighty-Four were on the list of forbidden books up until the end of communism in 1989, and were only available via clandestine Samizdat networks.[citation needed]

Orwell biographer Jeffrey Meyers has written that "virtually every detail has political significance in this allegory". Orwell himself wrote in 1946, " Of course I intended it primarily as a satire on the Russian revolution..[and] that kind of revolution (violent conspiratorial revolution, led by unconsciously power hungry people) can only lead to a change of masters [-] revolutions only effect a radical improvement when the masses are alert.."[18] And in a preface he wrote in 1947 for a Ukrainian edition he stated ; " ...for the past ten years I have been convinced that the destruction of the Soviet myth was essential if we wanted a revival of the socialist movement. On my return from Spain [in 1937] I thought of exposing the Soviet myth in a story that could be easily understood by almost anyone and which could be easily translated into other languages." [19]

The revolt of the animals against Farmer Jones is Orwell's analogy with the October 1917 Bolshevik Revolution and Jones's attempt to regain control, with the aid of neighbouring farmers, parallels the Western powers' efforts 1918-21 to crush the Bolsheviks. The pigs' rise to pre-eminence mirrors the rise of a Stalinist bureaucracy in the USSR, just as Napoleon's emergence as the farm's sole leader reflects Stalin's emergence. The pigs' appropriation of milk and apples for their own use, "the turning point of the story" as Orwell termed it in a letter to Dwight Macdonald,[20] stands as an analogy for the crushing of the left-wing 1921 Kronstadt revolt against the Bolsheviks, and the difficult efforts of the animals to build the windmill bring to mind the various Five Year Plans. The puppies controlled by Napoleon parallel the nurture of the secret police in the Stalinist structure and the pigs' treatment of the other animals on the farm recalls the internal terror faced by the populace in the 1930s.[21] In chapter seven when the animals confess their nonexistent crimes, and are slain, Orwell directly alludes to the purges, the confessions and show trials of the late 1930s. These contributed to Orwell's conviction that the Bolshevik revolution had been corrupted and the Soviet system become rotten. [22]

Peter Edgerly Firchow and Peter Hobley Davison consider that in real life, with events in Animal Farm mirroring those in the Soviet Union, the Battle of the Windmill represents the Great Patriotic War (World War II),[23] especially the Battle of Stalingrad and the Battle of Moscow.[24] During the battle, Fredrick drills a hole and places explosives inside, and this was followed by "All the animals, including Napoleon" took cover; Orwell had the publisher alter this to "All the animals except Napoleon" in recognition of Joseph Stalin's decision to remain in Moscow during the German advance.[25]

The Battle of the Cowshed represents the allied invasion of the Soviet Russia in 1918,[24] and the defeat of the White Russians in the Russian Civil War.[23]

The book's close, with the pigs and men in a kind of rapprochement, reflected Orwell's view of the 1943 Teheran Conference that seemed to display the establishment of "the best possible relations between the USSR and the West", - but in reality were destined, as Orwell presciently predicted, to continue to unravel.[26] The disagreement between the allies and the start of the Cold War is suggested when Napoleon and Pilkington, both suspicious, " played an ace of spades simultaneously".[27]

Efforts to find a publisher

Orwell encountered great difficulty getting the manuscript published, as it was feared that the book might upset the alliance between the US, UK and the Soviet Union. Four publishers refused; one had initially accepted the work but declined after consulting the Ministry of Information.[28][29] Eventually Secker and Warburg published the first edition in 1945.

During World War II, it became apparent to Orwell that anti-Soviet literature was not something which most major publishing houses would touch — including his regular publisher Gollancz. He also submitted the manuscript to Faber and Faber, where the poet T. S. Eliot (who was a director of the firm) rejected it; Eliot wrote back to Orwell praising its "good writing" and "fundamental integrity" but declared that they would only accept it for publication if they had some sympathy for the viewpoint "which I take to be generally Trotskyite". Eliot said he found the view "not convincing", and contended that the pigs were made out to be the best to run the farm; he posited that someone might argue "what was needed .. was not more communism but more public-spirited pigs".[30][31]

The publisher Jonathan Cape, who had initially accepted Animal Farm, subsequently rejected his book after an official at the British Ministry of Information warned him off[32] — although the civil servant who it is assumed gave the order was later found to be a Soviet spy.[33] Writing to Leonard Moore, a partner in the literary agency of Christy & Moore, publisher Jonathan Cape "explained that the decision had been taken on the advice of a senior official in the Ministry of Information. Such flagrant anti-Soviet bias was unacceptable: and the choice of pigs as the dominant class was thought to be especially offensive. The 'important official' was, or so it may reasonably be assumed, a man named Peter Smollett, later unmasked as a Soviet agent." Born Hans Peter Smolka in Vienna in 1912, he became a naturalized British subject in 1938, changed his name, and after the outbreak of WW2 joined the Ministry of Information where he organised pro-Soviet propaganda - Smollett's family has vigorously denied suggestions he was a spy.[34] The publisher then wrote to Orwell, saying:[32]

If the fable were addressed generally to dictators and dictatorships at large then publication would be all right, but the fable does follow, as I see now, so completely the progress of the Russian Soviets and their two dictators [Lenin and Stalin], that it can apply only to Russia, to the exclusion of the other dictatorships.

Another thing: it would be less offensive if the predominant caste in the fable were not pigs. I think the choice of pigs as the ruling caste will no doubt give offense to many people, and particularly to anyone who is a bit touchy, as undoubtedly the Russians are.

Frederic Warburg too, faced pressures against publication, even from people in his own office, and from his wife Pamela, who felt that it was not the moment for ingratitude towards Stalin and the heroic Red Army. [35] who had played a major part in defeating Hitler.

"The Freedom of the Press"

Orwell originally wrote a preface which complains about British self-censorship and how the British people were suppressing criticism of the USSR, their World War II ally. "The sinister fact about literary censorship in England is that it is largely voluntary. ... Things are kept right out of the British press, not because the Government intervenes but because of a general tacit agreement that 'it wouldn't do' to mention that particular fact." Although the first edition allowed space for the preface, it was not included,[28] and as of June 2009 has not been published with most editions of the book.[36]

Secker and Warburg published the first edition of Animal Farm in 1945 without any introduction. However, the publisher had provided space for a preface in the author's proof composited from the manuscript. For reasons unknown, no preface was supplied and all the page numbers needed to be redone at the last minute.[37][38]

Years later, in 1972, Ian Angus found the original typescript titled "The Freedom of the Press", and Bernard Crick published it, together with his own introduction in The Times Literary Supplement on 15 September 1972[37] as "How the essay came to be written".[38] Orwell's essay criticised British self-censorship by the press, specifically the suppression of unflattering descriptions of Stalin and the Soviet government.[38] The same essay also appeared in the Italian 1976 Animal Farm edition, with another introduction by Crick, claiming to be the first edition with the preface.[37] Other publishers were still declining to publish it.[clarification needed]

Cultural references

References to the novella are frequent in other works of popular culture, particularly in popular music and television series.

Adaptations

Animal Farm has been adapted to film twice. The 1954 Animal Farm film was an animated feature and the 1999 Animal Farm film was a TV live action version. Both differ from the novel, and have been accused of taking significant liberties, sanitising some aspects. In the 1954 version, Napoleon is apparently overthrown in a second revolution. The 1999 film shows Napoleon's regime collapsing in on itself, with the farm with new human owners, as happened in the Soviet Union, appropriating the new political reality to the story.

A theatrical version, with music and lyrics, was staged at the National Theatre London on 25 April 1984, directed by Peter Hall. It toured nine cities in 1985.[39]

Editions

  • LCCN 46006290 (hardcover, 1946, First American Edition)
  • ISBN 0-451-51679-6 (paperback, 1956, Signet Classic)
  • ISBN 0-582-02173-1 (paper text, 1989)
  • ISBN 0-15-107255-8 (hardcover, 1990)
  • ISBN 0-582-06010-9 (paper text, 1991)
  • ISBN 0-679-42039-8 (hardcover, 1993)
  • ISBN 0-606-00102-6 (prebound, 1996)
  • ISBN 0-15-100217-7 (hardcover, 1996, Anniversary Edition)
  • ISBN 0-452-27750-7 (paperback, 1996, Anniversary Edition)
  • ISBN 0-451-52634-1 (mass market paperback, 1996, Anniversary Edition)
  • ISBN 0-582-53008-3 (1996)
  • ISBN 1-56000-520-3 (cloth text, 1998, Large Type Edition)
  • ISBN 0-7910-4774-1 (hardcover, 1999)
  • ISBN 0-451-52536-1 (paperback, 1999)
  • ISBN 0-7641-0819-0 (paperback, 1999)
  • ISBN 0-8220-7009-X (e-book, 1999)
  • ISBN 0-7587-7843-0 (hardcover, 2002)
  • ISBN 0-15-101026-9 (hardcover, 2003, with Nineteen Eighty-Four)
  • ISBN 0-452-28424-4 (paperback, 2003, Centennial Edition)
  • ISBN 0-8488-0120-2 (hardcover)
  • ISBN 0-03-055434-9 (hardcover) Animal Farm with Connections
  • ISBN 0-395-79677-6 (hardcover) Animal Farm & Related Readings, 1997
  • ISBN 0-582-43447-5 (hardcover, 2007)
  • ISBN 0-14-103349-5 (paperback, 2007)

On 17 July 2009, Amazon.com withdrew certain Amazon Kindle titles, including Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell, from sale, refunded buyers, and remotely deleted items from purchasers' devices after discovering that the publisher lacked rights to publish the titles in question.[40] Notes and annotations for the books made by users on their devices were also deleted.[41] After the move prompted outcry and comparisons to Nineteen Eighty-Four itself, Amazon spokesman Drew Herdener stated that the company is "[c]hanging our systems so that in the future we will not remove books from customers' devices in these circumstances."[42]

See also

Books:

Notes

  1. ^ "Why I Write" (1936) (The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell Volume 1 – An Age Like This 1945–1950 p.23 (Penguin))
  2. ^ Orwell, writing in his review of Franz Borkenau's The Spanish Cockpit in Time and Tide, 31 July 1937, and Spilling the Spanish Beans, New English Weekly, 29 July 1937
  3. ^ a b c d Davison 2000.
  4. ^ Grossman & Lacayo 2005.
  5. ^ Orwell, George (1946). Animal Farm. London: Penguin Group. p. 21.
  6. ^ Rodden, John (1999). Understanding Animal Farm: A Student Casebook to Issues, Sources, and Historical Documents. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-0-313-30201-5. Retrieved 9 June 2012.
  7. ^ Carr, Craig L. (14 October 2010). Orwell, Politics, and Power. Continuum International Publishing Group. pp. 78–79. ISBN 978-1-4411-5854-3. Retrieved 9 June 2012.
  8. ^ a b c d John Rodden, "Introduction", in: John Rodden (ed.), Understanding Animal Farm, Westport/London (1999), p. 5f.
  9. ^ a b According to Christopher Hitchens, "the persons of Lenin and Trotsky are combined into one [i.e., Snowball], or, it might even be [...] to say, there is no Lenin at all." (Christopher Hitchens, Why Orwell Matters, Basic Books (2002), p. 186f).
  10. ^ Orwell 1979, p. 15, chapter II.
  11. ^ Quéval, Jean (1981). La ferme des animaux. Edition Gallimard. ISBN 978-2-07-037516-5. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |collection= ignored (help)
  12. ^ Orwell, George (1946). Animal Farm. New York: The New American Library. p. 40. ISBN 978-1-4193-6524-9.
  13. ^ Cambridge Companion to Orwell, p. 141
  14. ^ Cambridge Companion to Orwell, p.141
  15. ^ a b p. 47 of book
  16. ^ a b Orwell 1947.
  17. ^ Richard Overy, Why the Allies Won, p. 297 ISBN 0-393-03925-0
  18. ^ Orwell, A Life in Letters, Penguin Classics 2011 p.334
  19. ^ Bernard Crick, ' Orwell,A life', p.450
  20. ^ George Orwell, A Life in Letters, Penguin ISBN 978-0-141-19263-5 p.334
  21. ^ Orwell Subverted, p.6-7 Daniel Leab, Penn State Press 2007
  22. ^ Cambridge Companion to George Orwell, p.135, CUP 2007
  23. ^ a b Peter Edgerly Firchow, Modern Utopian Fictions from H.G. Wells to Iris Murdoch (2008), 102.
  24. ^ a b Peter Hobley Davison, George Orwell (1996), 161.
  25. ^ A Reader's Guide to George Orwell, Jeffrey Meyers, Thames & Hudson, p.142
  26. ^ Orwell Subverted, p.7, Daniel J. Leab , Penn State Press 2007.
  27. ^ Jeffrey Meyers, A Reader's Guide to George Orwell" p.142
  28. ^ a b Dag 2004.
  29. ^ Orwell 1976 page 25 La libertà di stampa
  30. ^ Richard Brooks, "TS Eliot’s snort of rejection for Animal Farm", Sunday Times, 29 March 2009.
  31. ^ Eliot, Valery (6 January 1969). "T.S. Eliot and Animal Farm: Reasons for Rejection". The Times. UK. Retrieved 8 April 2009.
  32. ^ a b "The whitewashing of Stalin". BBC News. 11 November 2008.
  33. ^ Taylor 2003, p. 337.
  34. ^ Orwell Subverted, Daniel J.Leab, Penn State Press, 2007 p.3
  35. ^ George Orwell, A Personal Memoir, T.R.Fyvel, p.139
  36. ^ Bailey83221 (Bailey83221 includes a preface and two cites: 26 August 1995 The Guardian page 28; 1995-08-26 New Statesman & Society 8 (366): 11. ISSN: 0954-2361)
  37. ^ a b c Orwell page 15. introduction by Bernard Crick
  38. ^ a b c George Orwell: The Freedom of the Press – Orwell's Proposed Preface to 'Animal Farm’. 1945
  39. ^ Orwell, A Life in Letters, Penguin Books 2011, p.341
  40. ^ Pogue, David (17 July 2009). "Some E-Books Are More Equal Than Others". Pogue.blogs.nytimes.com. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  41. ^ Stone, Brad (18 July 2009). "Amazon Erases Orwell Books From Kindle". The New York Times. pp. B1.
  42. ^ Fried, Ina (17 July 2009). "Amazon says it won't repeat Kindle book recall – CNet News". News.cnet.com. Retrieved 24 October 2010.

References