Nuclear power in Canada: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m ISBNs (Build KC)
ce
Line 13: Line 13:


==Notable accidents==
==Notable accidents==
{{See also|Nuclear power accidents by country#Canada}}
===Chalk River, 1952 and 1958===
===Chalk River, 1952 and 1958===
"A power surge and partial loss of coolant led to significant damage to the NRX reactor core in 1952. It was the world's first major nuclear reactor disaster, and it resulted in 4.5 tonnes of radioactive water collecting in the cellar of the building. In 1958, a fuel rupture in the reactor led to a fire and complete contamination of the NRU building. The military was called in both times to aid in the cleanup".<ref name=accide>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/01/09/f-canada-nuclear-reactors.html |title=
"A power surge and partial loss of coolant led to significant damage to the NRX reactor core in 1952. It was the world's first major nuclear reactor disaster, and it resulted in 4.5 tonnes of radioactive water collecting in the cellar of the building. In 1958, a fuel rupture in the reactor led to a fire and complete contamination of the NRU building. The military was called in both times to aid in the cleanup".<ref name=accide>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/01/09/f-canada-nuclear-reactors.html |title=
Line 26: Line 27:
On December 13, 2011, there was a radioactive spill at New Brunswick's Point Lepreau nuclear generating station. Up to six litres of heavy water splashed to the floor, forcing an evacuation of the reactor building and halt of operations. Then, on December 14, NB Power issued a news release, admitting there had been another type of spill three weeks earlier. The head of Canada's Nuclear Safety Commission said the two spills are "unsettling".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/01/06/nb-nuclear-commission-lepreau-leaks.html |title=Nuclear commission says Point Lepreau leaks 'unsettling' |author=Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon |date=Jan 9, 2012 |work=CBC News }}</ref>
On December 13, 2011, there was a radioactive spill at New Brunswick's Point Lepreau nuclear generating station. Up to six litres of heavy water splashed to the floor, forcing an evacuation of the reactor building and halt of operations. Then, on December 14, NB Power issued a news release, admitting there had been another type of spill three weeks earlier. The head of Canada's Nuclear Safety Commission said the two spills are "unsettling".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/01/06/nb-nuclear-commission-lepreau-leaks.html |title=Nuclear commission says Point Lepreau leaks 'unsettling' |author=Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon |date=Jan 9, 2012 |work=CBC News }}</ref>


==Public opinion==
See also [[Nuclear power accidents by country#Canada]]
According to a 2009 poll by Ipsos on behalf of the Canadian Nuclear Association, 43% of Canadians support nuclear power, compared with 53% that are against it. In terms of regions, Ontario is most in favour of nuclear power with support at 62%, while Quebec is the least with just 19%. 28% of those polled, said that their confidence in the Canadian nuclear industry had decreased in the 12 months to end August 2009. The main reasons for the worsened confidence were the medical isotope shortage (10%), issues surrounding Chalk River and AECL (10%) and safety concerns (9%).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?sectionCode=76&storyCode=2056948 |title=Public opinion: country by country views |author= |date=23 July 2010 |work=Nuclear Energy International }}</ref>


==Proposals==
==Proposals==
Line 38: Line 40:


==Anti-nuclear movement==
==Anti-nuclear movement==
{{Weasel|section|{{subst:April 2012}}|date=April 2012}}
{{Main|Anti-nuclear movement in Canada}}
{{Main|Anti-nuclear movement in Canada}}
Canada has an active [[anti-nuclear movement]], which includes major campaigning organisations like [[Greenpeace]] and the [[Sierra Club]]. Over 300 public interest groups across Canada have endorsed the mandate of the [[Sortir du nucléaire (Canada)|Campaign for Nuclear Phaseout]] (CNP). Some environmental organisations such as [[Energy Probe]], the [[Pembina Institute]] and the [[Gordon Edwards|Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility]] (CCNR) are reported to have developed considerable expertise on [[nuclear power]] and energy issues. There is also a long-standing tradition of indigenous opposition to [[uranium mining]].<ref name=mez>Lutz Mez, [[Mycle Schneider]] and [[Stephen Thomas (professor)|Steve Thomas]] (Eds.) (2009). ''International Perspectives of Energy Policy and the Role of Nuclear Power'', Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd, p. 257.</ref><ref name=schneider>Lutz Mez, Mycle Schneider and Steve Thomas (Eds.) (2009). ''International Perspectives of Energy Policy and the Role of Nuclear Power'', Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd, p. 279.</ref>
Canada has an active [[anti-nuclear movement]], which includes major campaigning organisations like [[Greenpeace]] and the [[Sierra Club]]. Over 300 public interest groups across Canada have endorsed the mandate of the [[Sortir du nucléaire (Canada)|Campaign for Nuclear Phaseout]] (CNP). Some environmental organisations such as [[Energy Probe]], the [[Pembina Institute]] and the [[Gordon Edwards|Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility]] (CCNR) are reported to have developed considerable expertise on [[nuclear power]] and energy issues. There is also a long-standing tradition of indigenous opposition to [[uranium mining]].<ref name=mez>Lutz Mez, [[Mycle Schneider]] and [[Stephen Thomas (professor)|Steve Thomas]] (Eds.) (2009). ''International Perspectives of Energy Policy and the Role of Nuclear Power'', Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd, p. 257.</ref><ref name=schneider>Lutz Mez, Mycle Schneider and Steve Thomas (Eds.) (2009). ''International Perspectives of Energy Policy and the Role of Nuclear Power'', Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd, p. 279.</ref>

Revision as of 00:26, 31 August 2012

As of 2009, about 15% of Canada's electricity is produced by nuclear power.[1]

History

The nuclear industry (as distinct from the uranium industry) in Canada dates back to 1942 when a joint British-Canadian laboratory, the Montreal Laboratory, was set up in Montreal, Quebec, under the administration of the National Research Council of Canada, to develop a design for a heavy-water nuclear reactor. This reactor was called National Research Experimental and would be the most powerful research reactor in the world when completed. In the meantime, in 1944, approval was given to proceed with the construction of the smaller ZEEP (Zero Energy Experimental Pile) test reactor at Chalk River, Ontario and on September 5, 1945 at 3:45 p.m., the 10 Watt ZEEP successfully achieved the first self-sustained nuclear reaction outside the United States.[citation needed]

In 1946, the Montreal Laboratory was closed, and the work continued at the Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories. Building partly on the experimental data obtained from ZEEP, the National Research Experimental (NRX)—a natural uranium, heavy water moderated research reactor—started up on July 22, 1947. It operated for 43 years, producing radioisotopes, undertaking fuels and materials development work for CANDU reactors, and providing neutrons for physics experiments. It was eventually joined in 1957 by the larger 200 megawatt (MW) National Research Universal (NRU) reactor.

In 1952, the Canadian government formed AECL, a Crown corporation with the mandate to develop peaceful uses of nuclear energy. A partnership was formed between AECL, Ontario Hydro and Canadian General Electric to build Canada's first nuclear power plant, called NPD for Nuclear Power Demonstration. The 20 MWe NPD started operation in 1962 and successfully demonstrated the unique concepts of on-power refuelling using natural uranium fuel, and heavy water moderator and coolant. These features formed the basis of a fleet of CANDU power reactors (CANDU is an acronym for CANada Deuterium Uranium) built and operated in Canada and elsewhere.

In the late 1960s (1967–1970), Canada also developed an experimental miniature nuclear reactor named SLOWPOKE (acronym for Safe Low-Power Kritical Experiment). The first prototype was built at Chalk River and many SLOWPOKEs were subsequently built, mainly for research. Many SLOWPOKEs are still in use in Canada; there is one running at École Polytechnique de Montréal, for instance.

Notable accidents

Chalk River, 1952 and 1958

"A power surge and partial loss of coolant led to significant damage to the NRX reactor core in 1952. It was the world's first major nuclear reactor disaster, and it resulted in 4.5 tonnes of radioactive water collecting in the cellar of the building. In 1958, a fuel rupture in the reactor led to a fire and complete contamination of the NRU building. The military was called in both times to aid in the cleanup".[2]

Pickering, 1974 and 1983

"The most serious nuclear accidents in Canada happened at the Pickering facility east of Toronto, in 1974 and in 1983. In each case, pressure tubes — which hold fuel rods — ruptured. Some coolant escaped, but was recovered before it left the plant, and there was no release of radioactive material from the containment building".[2]

Darlington, 2009

In 2009, more than 200,000 litres of water containing trace amounts of tritium and hydrazine spilled into Lake Ontario after workers accidentally filled the wrong tank with tritiated water. The level of the isotope in the lake was not enough to pose harm to residents.[2][3]

Point Lepreau, 2011

On December 13, 2011, there was a radioactive spill at New Brunswick's Point Lepreau nuclear generating station. Up to six litres of heavy water splashed to the floor, forcing an evacuation of the reactor building and halt of operations. Then, on December 14, NB Power issued a news release, admitting there had been another type of spill three weeks earlier. The head of Canada's Nuclear Safety Commission said the two spills are "unsettling".[4]

Public opinion

According to a 2009 poll by Ipsos on behalf of the Canadian Nuclear Association, 43% of Canadians support nuclear power, compared with 53% that are against it. In terms of regions, Ontario is most in favour of nuclear power with support at 62%, while Quebec is the least with just 19%. 28% of those polled, said that their confidence in the Canadian nuclear industry had decreased in the 12 months to end August 2009. The main reasons for the worsened confidence were the medical isotope shortage (10%), issues surrounding Chalk River and AECL (10%) and safety concerns (9%).[5]

Proposals

The Province of Ontario has announced plans to build a new nuclear station. The leading candidate is AECL's Advanced CANDU Reactor. Environmental assessments are currently underway for one site next to Bruce Power's Bruce Nuclear Generating Station in Tiverton and another next to Ontario Power Generation's Darlington Nuclear Generating Station.

In December 2011, Bruce Power abandoned plans to build a nuclear power plant in northern Alberta. The company had proposed building up to four nuclear reactors that could produce 4,000 megawatts of electricity at a site 30 kilometres north of Peace River.[6]

Safety following Fukushima

Following the 2011 Japanese nuclear accidents, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has "ordered all reactor operators to revisit their safety plans and report on potential improvements" by the end of April.[7]

Anti-nuclear movement

Canada has an active anti-nuclear movement, which includes major campaigning organisations like Greenpeace and the Sierra Club. Over 300 public interest groups across Canada have endorsed the mandate of the Campaign for Nuclear Phaseout (CNP). Some environmental organisations such as Energy Probe, the Pembina Institute and the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility (CCNR) are reported to have developed considerable expertise on nuclear power and energy issues. There is also a long-standing tradition of indigenous opposition to uranium mining.[8][9]

The province of British Columbia firmly maintains a strict no-nuclear policy. The Crown corporation, BC Hydro, upholds this principal by "rejecting consideration of nuclear power in implementing B.C.'s clean energy strategy." [10]

See also

References

  1. ^ Statistics Canada (2009), Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution (catalog number: 57-202-X) (PDF), Ottawa: Statistics Canada, pp. 10–11, ISSN 1703-2636 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. ^ a b c "A closer look at Canada's nuclear plants". CBC News. Jan 9, 2012.
  3. ^ "Nuclear plant spills tritium into lake". 2011-04-12. Retrieved 2012-03-27.
  4. ^ Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon (Jan 9, 2012). "Nuclear commission says Point Lepreau leaks 'unsettling'". CBC News.
  5. ^ "Public opinion: country by country views". Nuclear Energy International. 23 July 2010.
  6. ^ Nicki Thomas and Elise Stolte (December 13, 2011). "Bruce Power withdraws nuclear plant proposal". Edmonton Journal.
  7. ^ Sarah Boesveld (March 21, 2011). %5b%5bCategory:All articles with dead external links%5d%5d%5b%5bCategory:Articles with dead external links from March 2012%5d%5d[%5b%5bWikipedia:Link rot|dead link%5d%5d] "Nuclear commission orders Canadian reactors to review safety plans". National Post. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  8. ^ Lutz Mez, Mycle Schneider and Steve Thomas (Eds.) (2009). International Perspectives of Energy Policy and the Role of Nuclear Power, Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd, p. 257.
  9. ^ Lutz Mez, Mycle Schneider and Steve Thomas (Eds.) (2009). International Perspectives of Energy Policy and the Role of Nuclear Power, Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd, p. 279.
  10. ^ http://www.bchydro.com/news/articles/press_releases/2010/new_act_powers_bc_forward.html

Further reading

External links