Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article nominations: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Poor Yorick (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
it's not self-noms that we're discouraging, it's self-promotions
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Wikipedia:Good articles]] is an unbureaucratic system to arrive at a quick consensus set of good articles: everyone can nominate good articles, and everyone has veto power. Self-nominations are frowned upon; that's what this list is for.
[[Wikipedia:Good articles]] is an unbureaucratic system to arrive at a quick consensus set of good articles: everyone can nominate good articles, and everyone has veto power. Self-promotions are frowned upon; that's what this list is for.


== Instructions ==
== Instructions ==

Revision as of 20:37, 1 March 2006

Wikipedia:Good articles is an unbureaucratic system to arrive at a quick consensus set of good articles: everyone can nominate good articles, and everyone has veto power. Self-promotions are frowned upon; that's what this list is for.

Instructions

For self-nominators

If you have contributed significantly to an article you believe to be good, list it below under "Self-nominations" using "{{article|NAME OF ARTICLE}}" and sign your nomination using four tildes (~~~~). You are done.

For all others

If you see an article below under "Self-nominations" that you haven't significantly contributed to and that you consider to be good, remove it from the list, add {{GA}} to its talk page, and list it on Wikipedia:Good articles.

If you see an article below under "Self-nominations" that you don't consider to be good, simply remove it from the list and add {{FailedGA}} to its talk page. Please leave a reason in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Self-nominations

your addition here