Anti-nuclear movement in Canada: Difference between revisions
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
==Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee== |
==Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee== |
||
The Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee (PHCHCC) is an incorporated nonprofit community organization which aims to produce a comprehensive independent health assessment about long term exposure to radioactive and heavy metal contaminants from sixty years of nuclear industry operations in Port Hope.<ref>[http://www.porthopehealthconcerns.com/about_phchcc.htm Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee]</ref> |
The Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee (PHCHCC) is an incorporated nonprofit community organization which aims to produce a comprehensive independent health assessment about long term exposure to radioactive and heavy metal contaminants from sixty years of nuclear industry operations in Port Hope.<ref>[http://www.porthopehealthconcerns.com/about_phchcc.htm Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee]</ref> |
||
==Port Hope Families Against Radiation Exposure== |
|||
The Port Hope Families Against Radiation Exposure group consists of 1570 concerned residents of Port Hope who are monitoring the activities of the nuclear industry, following a 16-month campaign against the plans of [[Cameco Corporation]] to enrich uranium.<ref>[http://www.ph-fare.com/ Port Hope Families Against Radiation Exposure]</ref> |
|||
==Sierra Club of Canada== |
==Sierra Club of Canada== |
Revision as of 21:37, 4 December 2008
Uranium mining and export, and nuclear issues, have at times been the subject of public debate in Canada, and many different anti-nuclear groups have been involved.
Algonquin tribe
Members of the Algonquin tribe have been peacefully blockading a uranium mining operation on their sacred lands north of Kingston, Ontario since June 29, 2007.[1]
Campaign for Nuclear Phaseout
The Campaign for Nuclear Phaseout (CNP) represents a coalition of Canadian public interest organizations concerned with the environmental impacts of nuclear power generation. CNP's mandate is supported by over 300 public interest groups from across Canada.[2]
In 2003, Campaign for Nuclear Phaseout commissioned the report Phasing Out Nuclear Power in Canada, which outlined a possible scenario where the central coal and nuclear plants in Ontario, Québec and New Brunswick could be phased out as they reach the end of their operational lifespan, to be replaced with a combination of more efficient energy use, expansion of combined heat and power technology, and deployment of renewable energy and distributed sources of power generation.[3]
Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility
CCNR is a non-profit organization, federally incorporated since 1978. It conducts education and research on issues related to nuclear energy, whether civilian or military (including non-nuclear alternatives), especially those pertaining to Canada.[4]
Citizens Advocating the Use of Sustainable Energy
Citizens Advocating the Use of Sustainable Energy (CAUSE) is a Calgary-based grassroots group opposing plans for nuclear development in Alberta. CAUSE is a member of the Coalition for a Nuclear Free Alberta, a province-wide coalition of groups committed to keeping Alberta nuclear free.[5]
Greenpeace Canada
Greenpeace Canada argues that nuclear power is an unacceptable risk to the environment and to humanity, and that the only solution is to halt the expansion of all nuclear power and to shutdown existing plants. Greenpeace Canada believes we need an energy system that can combat climate change, based on renewable energy and energy efficiency. [6][7]
Energy Probe
Energy Probe is a consumer and environmental research team, which is opposed to nuclear power, and dedicated to resource conservation, economic efficiency, and effective utility regulation.[8]
Energy Quest 4 Nanticoke
Energy Quest 4 Nanticoke was formed to ensure citizens have a democratic say in our energy future. To raise awareness on energy options for the Ontario regions of Haldimand/Norfolk/Brant/Hamilton, as the county council's of Norfolk and Haldimand endorsed an Environmental Assessment on a nuclear reactor at Nanticoke without meaningful public debate on the risks and benefits of a nuclear station at Nanticoke. It will be the residents of Grand Erie that take on the risks of a nuclear power plant at Nanticoke. The safety, financial and environmental risks as well as the long term management of nuclear waste have not been debated, clarified and/or agreed to by our communities.[9]
Inter-Church Uranium Committee Educational Co-operative
The Inter-Church Uranium Committee Educational Co-operative (ICUCEC) is an inter-church coalition that educates people about the nuclear industry in Saskatchewan and halt all nuclear development in the province, including the mining of uranium.[10]
Nuclear Free Great Lakes Campaign
The Nuclear Free Great Lakes Campaign consists of eight safe-energy organizations from Canada and the United States dedicated to the cessation of radioactive contamination of the Great Lakes Basin, and the removal of nuclear power from the area.[11]
Pembina Institute
The Pembina Institute is a Canadian not-for-profit environmental policy research and education organization specializing in the fields of sustainable energy, community sustainability, global warming and corporate environmental management. Founded in 1985, the Institute has offices in Calgary, Edmonton, Vancouver, Ottawa and Toronto. In 2006 the Institute released the report Nuclear Power in Canada: An Examination of Risks, Impacts and Sustainability.[12][13]
Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee
The Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee (PHCHCC) is an incorporated nonprofit community organization which aims to produce a comprehensive independent health assessment about long term exposure to radioactive and heavy metal contaminants from sixty years of nuclear industry operations in Port Hope.[14]
Port Hope Families Against Radiation Exposure
The Port Hope Families Against Radiation Exposure group consists of 1570 concerned residents of Port Hope who are monitoring the activities of the nuclear industry, following a 16-month campaign against the plans of Cameco Corporation to enrich uranium.[15]
Sierra Club of Canada
The Sierra Club of Canada has been active in Canada since 1963 and a national office was established in Ottawa in 1989. There are active chapters in every region of Canada, with offices in Ottawa, Victoria, Sydney, Corner Brook, Halifax, Edmonton, Montreal and Toronto.[16] The Sierra Club contends that despite over 50-years of development and government support in Canada, nuclear power continues to be plagued by cost overruns, technical problems, accidents and the ongoing difficulty of how to manage high-level nuclear waste.[17]
See also
- Energy policy of Canada
- Gordon Edwards
- List of anti-nuclear groups
- List of Canadian nuclear facilities
- Maisie Shiell
- Nuclear power in Canada
- Pickering Nuclear Generating Station
- Renewable energy commercialization
- Sustainable Development Strategy in Canada
- Gerald W. Brown
- Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
- List of wind farms in Canada
References
- ^ Algonquin Alliance Protest Update
- ^ Campaign for nuclear phaseout
- ^ Phasing Out Nuclear Power in Canada
- ^ Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility
- ^ Citizens Advocating the Use of Sustainable Energy
- ^ End the nuclear threat
- ^ Press releases
- ^ [1]
- ^ Grand Erie Energy Quest
- ^ Inter-Church Uranium Committee Educational Co-operative
- ^ Comments of the Nuclear Free Great Lakes Campaign
- ^ Nuclear Power in Canada
- ^ The Pembina Institute
- ^ Port Hope Community Health Concerns Committee
- ^ Port Hope Families Against Radiation Exposure
- ^ Welcome to the Sierra Club of Canada!
- ^ Towards a Nuclear-Free Canada
Further reading
- Harding, Jim (2007). Canada's Deadly Secret: Saskatchewan Uranium and the Global Nuclear System.
- Mehta, M.D. (2005). Risky Business: Nuclear Power and Public Protest in Canada. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
- Pembina Institute (2007). Clearing the Air About Nuclear Power
- Pembina Institute (2007). Uranium Mining: Nuclear Power’s Dirty Secret
External links
- Tritium leak protests prompt Canada to suspend discharges
- Canadians join international plutonium protest
- High levels of radioactive tritium found in Pembroke landfill
- The Ethical Funds Company says that Nuclear Power is Too Risky
- Canada's Nuclear Watchdog Says Minister Meddling, Globe Reports
- Anti-nuclear activists begin battle for minds of Albertans
- Sacking of nuclear official prompts row
- Crowd on cruise control
- B.C. shuts door on uranium projects
- Nuclear industry spins new mythology
- Retired professor warns against pursuing nuclear power
- Canada: Ban on uranium mining in British Columbia
- Nuclear protest convoy dumps on Alberta reactor
- MLAs table anti-nuclear petitions in legislature
- Anti-nuclear groups take their message to legislature