User talk:Guerino Symons: Difference between revisions
Caution: Improper use of warning or blocking template. |
→Only warnings: not welcome on my talk page |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::What concerns? Those edits were absolutely vandalism. 100%. I will not be stopping simply because you are "concerned". [[User:Guerino Symons|Guerino Symons]] ([[User talk:Guerino Symons#top|talk]]) 12:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
:::What concerns? Those edits were absolutely vandalism. 100%. I will not be stopping simply because you are "concerned". [[User:Guerino Symons|Guerino Symons]] ([[User talk:Guerino Symons#top|talk]]) 12:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::[[Special:Diff/1223029078|How is this edit vandalism]]? How is that egregious enough for an [[Special:Diff/1223029534|only warning]]? You evidently do not know the definition of [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]] on Wikipedia, which is to ''intentionally make unconstructive edits with the intention of disrupting Wikipedia''. The edits you are reverting do not meet this criteria. You must be able to explain your edits, or risk being [[WP:Blocking|blocked]] from editing. —[[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">Talk</span>]] · [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">Contributions</span>]]) 13:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
::::[[Special:Diff/1223029078|How is this edit vandalism]]? How is that egregious enough for an [[Special:Diff/1223029534|only warning]]? You evidently do not know the definition of [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]] on Wikipedia, which is to ''intentionally make unconstructive edits with the intention of disrupting Wikipedia''. The edits you are reverting do not meet this criteria. You must be able to explain your edits, or risk being [[WP:Blocking|blocked]] from editing. —[[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">Talk</span>]] · [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">Contributions</span>]]) 13:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::Consider this a polite request to FU<nowiki></nowiki>CK OFF AND MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS. [[User:Guerino Symons|Guerino Symons]] ([[User talk:Guerino Symons#top|talk]]) 13:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Stop stalking and threatening other users == |
== Stop stalking and threatening other users == |
||
Revision as of 13:12, 9 May 2024
| This is Guerino Symons's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Only warnings
I realise k6ka did not vandalise here. User giving out warning, without giving proper reason - probably a robot of some sort
Why did you leave an only warning for this edit? I'm not seeing anything in that edit that would warrant an only warning. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Same with this edit, which is not vandalism and should not have been issued an only warning for vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Guerino Symons, please address these concerns before continuing to make reverts. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- What concerns? Those edits were absolutely vandalism. 100%. I will not be stopping simply because you are "concerned". Guerino Symons (talk) 12:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- How is this edit vandalism? How is that egregious enough for an only warning? You evidently do not know the definition of vandalism on Wikipedia, which is to intentionally make unconstructive edits with the intention of disrupting Wikipedia. The edits you are reverting do not meet this criteria. You must be able to explain your edits, or risk being blocked from editing. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Consider this a polite request to FUCK OFF AND MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS. Guerino Symons (talk) 13:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- How is this edit vandalism? How is that egregious enough for an only warning? You evidently do not know the definition of vandalism on Wikipedia, which is to intentionally make unconstructive edits with the intention of disrupting Wikipedia. The edits you are reverting do not meet this criteria. You must be able to explain your edits, or risk being blocked from editing. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- What concerns? Those edits were absolutely vandalism. 100%. I will not be stopping simply because you are "concerned". Guerino Symons (talk) 12:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Guerino Symons, please address these concerns before continuing to make reverts. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Stop stalking and threatening other users
(from another user) I agree with this user, this guerino acts like a robot and reverts does not comply with wikipedia rules
Listen here, stop threatening and harassing other users. You are disrupting other users' experience by threatening them that they are vandalizing articles on Wikipedia. Remember the threat you sent to my sister threatening to block her over her editing of the Onoe Shōroku II article? Well then, it won't stay that way, as I'm one step away from reporting you for a veiled threat. Explain to me why you threatened her? MafiaBoy123 (talk) 13:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- No you listen here. You mind your own business and STOP VANDALISING. Guerino Symons (talk) 13:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- None of the content that the user added to that page was vandalism, as such I have removed those warnings @MafiaBoy123. I would seriously advise responding to the messages you've been left above. CommissarDoggoTalk? 13:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. CommissarDoggoTalk? 13:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)