User talk:Chiswick Chap: Difference between revisions
seen |
→Response: new section |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
The article [[Pauline Baynes]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[File:Symbol wait.svg|20px|link=]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See [[Talk:Pauline Baynes]] and [[Talk:Pauline Baynes/GA1]] for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:ChristieBot|ChristieBot]], on behalf of [[User:Simongraham|Simongraham]]</small> -- [[User:Simongraham|Simongraham]] ([[User talk:Simongraham|talk]]) 00:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC) |
The article [[Pauline Baynes]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[File:Symbol wait.svg|20px|link=]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See [[Talk:Pauline Baynes]] and [[Talk:Pauline Baynes/GA1]] for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:ChristieBot|ChristieBot]], on behalf of [[User:Simongraham|Simongraham]]</small> -- [[User:Simongraham|Simongraham]] ([[User talk:Simongraham|talk]]) 00:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Response == |
|||
Well I hope this message finds you in great spirits @[[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]]. It was a mistake on my part that I claimed to be a significant contributor to Sherlock Holmes' article and nominated it for GA. I have responded on the GA nominations talk page and my own as well. But I have worked extensively on Prince George's article for over a year. Now that I have nominated it being among the top five authors, I want to work on it's promotion to GA-class. I assure you that I will not make any drive-by GA nominations in future like the one I made at [[Sherlock Holmes]]. Awaiting a positive response and also at the GA nominations page. Regards and yours faithfully, [[User:MSincccc|MSincccc]] ([[User talk:MSincccc|talk]]) 08:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:09, 28 March 2024
- Archives
2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 - 2019 - 2020 - 2021 - 2022 - 2023 - 2024 -
 |
|---|
| 16 May 2024 |
Your GA nomination of Philology and Middle-earth
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Philology and Middle-earth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 03:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Anachronism in Middle-earth
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anachronism in Middle-earth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 11:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pauline Baynes
The article Pauline Baynes you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pauline Baynes and Talk:Pauline Baynes/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Response
Well I hope this message finds you in great spirits @Chiswick Chap. It was a mistake on my part that I claimed to be a significant contributor to Sherlock Holmes' article and nominated it for GA. I have responded on the GA nominations talk page and my own as well. But I have worked extensively on Prince George's article for over a year. Now that I have nominated it being among the top five authors, I want to work on it's promotion to GA-class. I assure you that I will not make any drive-by GA nominations in future like the one I made at Sherlock Holmes. Awaiting a positive response and also at the GA nominations page. Regards and yours faithfully, MSincccc (talk) 08:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)