Jump to content

Template:Protection table: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Per talk, Office prot does not belong in the table, because this is a table meant to help editors understanding the protections levels commonly encountered, and to as a refresher for admins selecting among protection levels they may impose. Neither applies to Office protection, which is extremely unusual to say the very least. By your reasoning Cascade protection should be in the table as well. You're cluttering the table to zero benefit.
Tags: Undo Reverted
Undid revision 1215166323 by EEng (talk) None of the reasoning is in the talk, and putting the office protection in the talk, does not add clutter. As for cascade protection, that might very well be belong in the table - we can discuss in the talk if you'd like.
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 34: Line 34:
| [[Wikipedia:High-risk templates|High-risk]] or very-frequently used templates and modules. [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Template protection|Some]] high-risk pages outside of [[WP:Template namespace|template space]].
| [[Wikipedia:High-risk templates|High-risk]] or very-frequently used templates and modules. [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Template protection|Some]] high-risk pages outside of [[WP:Template namespace|template space]].
|-
|-
!scope="row" style="text-align:left" | [[File:Full-protection-shackle.svg|20px]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Full protection|Full]]
!scope="row" style="text-align:left" | [[File:Full-protection-shackle.svg|20px]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Full protection|Full]]<br><br><br> [[File:Office-protection-shackle.svg|20px|Protected by Office|alt=Black padlock]] [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#office|Office]]

|colspan="4" style="background:#ffcccc" | {{small caps|Cannot edit}}
|colspan="4" style="background:#ffcccc" | {{small caps|Cannot edit}}
|colspan="2" style="background:#ccffcc" | {{small caps|Normal editing}}
|colspan="2" style="background:#ccffcc" | {{small caps|Normal editing}}<sup>†</sup>
| Pages with persistent disruption from extended confirmed accounts. Critical templates and modules.
| Full protection: pages with persistent disruption from extended confirmed accounts, and critical templates and modules.<br>—<br>Office protection: Pages that the [[Wikimedia Foundation]] determined should not be edited without its consent.

|-
|-
!scope="row" style="text-align:left" | [[File:Interface-protection-shackle.svg|20px]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Interface protection|Interface]]
!scope="row" style="text-align:left" | [[File:Interface-protection-shackle.svg|20px]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Interface protection|Interface]]
Line 44: Line 46:
| Scripts, stylesheets, and similar objects central to operation of the site or that are in other editors' user spaces.
| Scripts, stylesheets, and similar objects central to operation of the site or that are in other editors' user spaces.
|-
|-
|colspan="8" style="text-align:left" |<big>'''*'''</big> In order to edit through extended confirmed protection, a template editor must also be extended confirmed, but in practice this is almost always the case.<!-- There are other cases that could be mentioned (e.g. a Template editor needs to be confirmed/autoconfirmed, or an admin, in order to edit through semiprotection) but they're just too esoteric. Also, the reason the footnote doesn't use the common <ref> or {efn} machinery is that an asterisk does the job just fine and maybe better--><br />Other modes of protection:
|colspan="8" style="text-align:left" |<big>'''*'''</big> In order to edit through extended confirmed protection, a template editor must also be extended confirmed, but in practice this is almost always the case.<br><sup>†</sup> No editing allowed except for routine maintenance, uncontroversial edits requested at the talk page, and (in the case of office protection) approval by the Wikimedia Foundation.<!-- There are other cases that could be mentioned (e.g. a Template editor needs to be confirmed/autoconfirmed, or an admin, in order to edit through semiprotection) but they're just too esoteric. Also, the reason the footnote doesn't use the common <ref> or {efn} machinery is that an asterisk does the job just fine and maybe better--><br />Other modes of protection:
{{div col|colwidth=11em}}
{{div col|colwidth=11em}}
{{unbulleted list
{{unbulleted list
Line 50: Line 52:
|[[File:Move-protection-shackle.svg |20px|Move protected|alt=Green padlock]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#move|Move protection]]
|[[File:Move-protection-shackle.svg |20px|Move protected|alt=Green padlock]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#move|Move protection]]
|[[File:Upload-protection-shackle.svg |20px|Upload protected|alt=Purple padlock]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#upload|Upload protection]]
|[[File:Upload-protection-shackle.svg |20px|Upload protected|alt=Purple padlock]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#upload|Upload protection]]
|[[File:Office-protection-shackle.svg |20px|Protected by Office|alt=Black padlock]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#office|Office protection]]
|[[File:Cascade-protection-shackle.svg |20px|Cascade protected|alt=Turquoise padlock]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#cascade|Cascade protection]]}}
|[[File:Cascade-protection-shackle.svg |20px|Cascade protected|alt=Turquoise padlock]][[Wikipedia:Protection policy#cascade|Cascade protection]]}}
{{div col end}}
{{div col end}}

Revision as of 15:51, 23 March 2024

Interaction of Wikipedia user groups and page protection levels
  Unregistered or newly registered Confirmed or autoconfirmed Extended confirmed Template editor Admin Interface admin Appropriate for
(See also: Wikipedia:Protection policy)
No protection Normal editing The vast majority of pages. This is the default protection level.
Pending changes All users can edit
Edits by unregistered or new editors (and any subsequent edits by anyone) are hidden from readers who are not logged in, until reviewed by a pending changes reviewer or admin. Logged-in editors see all edits, whether accepted or not.
Infrequently edited pages with high levels of vandalism, BLP violations, edit-warring, or other disruption from unregistered and new users.
Semi Cannot edit Normal editing Pages that have been persistently vandalized by anonymous and registered users. Some highly visible templates and modules.
Extended confirmed Cannot edit Normal editing* Specific topic areas authorized by ArbCom, pages where semi-protection has failed, or high-risk templates where template protection would be too restrictive.
Template Cannot edit Normal editing High-risk or very-frequently used templates and modules. Some high-risk pages outside of template space.
Full


Black padlock Office
Cannot edit Normal editing Full protection: pages with persistent disruption from extended confirmed accounts, and critical templates and modules.

Office protection: Pages that the Wikimedia Foundation determined should not be edited without its consent.
Interface Cannot edit Normal editing Scripts, stylesheets, and similar objects central to operation of the site or that are in other editors' user spaces.
* In order to edit through extended confirmed protection, a template editor must also be extended confirmed, but in practice this is almost always the case.
No editing allowed except for routine maintenance, uncontroversial edits requested at the talk page, and (in the case of office protection) approval by the Wikimedia Foundation.
Other modes of protection: