Jump to content

National Law School of India Review: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Newspaper/Magazine/journal cleanup; General + punct fixes
Tag: New redirect
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[National Law School of India University]]
{{primary sources|date=November 2008}}

{{Infobox journal
{{Rcat shell|
| title = National Law School of India Review
{{R to related topic}}
| cover =
| caption =
| former_name = Student Bar Review
| abbreviation = Natl. Law Sch. India Rev.
| discipline = [[Law]]
| peer-reviewed =
| language = English
| editor = Kopal Mital
| publisher = Student Advocate Committee, [[National Law School of India University]], Bangalore
| country = [[India]]
| history = 1988 - present
| frequency = Annually
| openaccess = Yes
| website = http://www.nlsir.com/
}}
}}

The '''''National Law School of India Review''''' is a student-run, [[Peer review|peer-reviewed]], bi-annual [[law review]] published by the ''Student Advocate Committee'' of the [[National Law School of India University]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Home {{!}} National Law School of India Review |url=https://www.nlsir.com/ |access-date=2023-01-07 |website=NLSIR |language=en}}</ref>

== History ==
The journal was established in 1988 as the ''Student Bar Review''. It obtained its current name in 2007. Notable authors include Justice B.N. Srikrishna (former Judge, [[Supreme Court of India]]), Rajeev Dhawan, Fali Nariman, and P.P. Rao (senior advocates).

== Citations ==
The journal has been cited in various publications and the only student-run journal to be cited by the [[Supreme Court of India]] in cases of ''Action Committee, Un-Aided Pvt. Schools & Ors.Vs. Director of Education, Delhi'', the [[Right to Privacy verdict]] and ''Union of India v. M/s Mohit Minerals''.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Action Committee, Un-Aided Pvt. Schools & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Director of Education, Delhi & Ors. ...Respondents |url=https://main.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/35285.pdf |journal=Supreme Court of India |pages=22 |quote=It is also of some interest to note that opinions in the academic field are being expressed that res extra commercium is an expression wrongly used in the last sixty years by this Court and other High Courts. No activity can be called "res extra commercium". It is either permitted or not. Having regard to its conceptual roots to Roman law, it would mean only those things which are not incapable of being ownership and, thus, any matter which is res extra commercium were things incapable of ownership be vests in res in commercio. [See Arvind Datar, "Privilege, Police Power and Res Extra Commercium – Glaring Conceptual Errors" 21(1) National Law School of India Review 133 (2009)]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |title=Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. vs Union Of India & Ors. (2017) |url=https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2012/35071/35071_2012_Judgement_24-Aug-2017.pdf |journal=Supreme Court of India |pages=53}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Union of India & Anr. v. M/s Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Through Director |publisher=[[Supreme Court of India]] |year=2022 |pages=75 |language=English}}</ref>

== See also ==
* [[Legal periodical]]

== References ==
<references/>

== External links ==
* {{Official website|http://nlsir.in}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:National Law School Of India Review}}
[[Category:Indian law journals]]
[[Category:Biannual journals]]
[[Category:English-language journals]]
[[Category:Academic journals established in 1988]]

Latest revision as of 13:48, 22 March 2024