Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted |
→Zzuuzz blocked Shim119's IP address: This request has been declined as clearly premature |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}} |
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}} |
||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
||
== Zzuuzz blocked Shim119's IP address == |
|||
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Shim119|Shim119]] ([[User talk:Shim119|talk]]) '''at''' 19:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
=== Involved parties === |
|||
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator --> |
|||
*{{userlinks|Shim119}}, ''filing party'' |
|||
*{{admin|zzuuzz}} |
|||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request |
|||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> |
|||
*[diff of notification zzuuzz] |
|||
;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried |
|||
* Link 1 |
|||
* Link 2 |
|||
=== Statement by Shim119 === |
|||
User Zzuuzz blocked my ip address citing vandalism from other IP addresses which i am unaware of. I want the arbcom to review as well as the community to review this person's recent behaviour so the proper action can be taken going forward. I suspected the account was compromised given that it's unusual for someone to block an account and then block the IP address long term. [[User:Shim119|Shim119]] ([[User talk:Shim119|talk]]) 19:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:I'd be happy to take this to [[WP:AN]]. I only was upset that I was being suspected for vandalism I didn't commit. I suspect someone was able to login from our wifi and do something I'm unaware of. Still, I think the community deserves to know the reason zzuuzz's extreme reactions when most admins -- even those familiar the checkuser app -- often will block the IP for about a week/month or simply let the autoblock do it's job. long term blocks often lead to collateral damage and besides, most the the IPs like the one I'm using will change over a year or so and sooner or later it won't belong to me. [[User:Shim119|Shim119]] ([[User talk:Shim119|talk]]) 20:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by zzuuzz === |
|||
I advise [[User:Shim119|Shim119]], in their own interests, to get in touch with Arbcom privately about any particular circumstances affecting them, and I hope that Arbcom will seriously entertain what they have to say. I don't think any of their particulars would be well suited to public discussion, but anything else that's public is probably fair game. I'm happy to answer any questions, that I'm permitted to answer, or discuss many other things. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 19:39, 21 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by WaltCip === |
|||
No prior attempts at dispute resolution, no attempt to notify the involved parties. Nothing here to do. --'''[[User:WaltCip|⛵ <span style="color: white; font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(white, blue, navy, black)">WaltClipper</span> ]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 19:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by Deepfriedokra === |
|||
*What Waltclip said. {{yo|Shim119}}. You should first discuss with zzuuzz. If that doesn't resolve the matter, post to [[WP:AN]]. You might want to withdraw this. [[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
=== Statement by {Non-party} === |
|||
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information. |
|||
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * --> |
|||
=== Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Clerk notes === |
|||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' |
|||
* |
|||
=== Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> === |
|||
{{anchor|1=Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small> |
|||
* |
|||
Revision as of 22:28, 21 March 2023
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
[edit]
Open cases
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Definition of the "area of conflict" Clause 4 (b) | Motion | (orig. case) | 26 July 2024 |
| Amendment request: Palestine-Israel articles (AE referral) | Motion | (orig. case) | 17 August 2024 |
| Clarification request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | none | (orig. case) | 8 September 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|