Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.

File an arbitration request

Guidance on participation and word limits

Unlike many venues on Wikipedia, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.

Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing clerks-llists.wikimedia.org. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
- Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using ~~~~).
Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.

General guidance

This page is for statements, not discussion.
Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, e.g. off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
Declined case requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&oldid=1145950719"

Hidden categories:

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 {{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}}
 <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
-== Zzuuzz blocked Shim119's IP address ==
-'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Shim119|Shim119]] ([[User talk:Shim119|talk]]) '''at''' 19:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
-=== Involved parties ===
-<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator -->
-*{{userlinks|Shim119}}, ''filing party''
-*{{admin|zzuuzz}}
-;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
-<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
-*[diff of notification zzuuzz]
-;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
-* Link 1
-* Link 2
-=== Statement by Shim119 ===
-User Zzuuzz blocked my ip address citing vandalism from other IP addresses which i am unaware of.  I want the arbcom to review as well as the community to review this person's recent behaviour so the proper action can be taken going forward.  I suspected the account was compromised given that it's unusual for someone to block an account and then block the IP address long term. [[User:Shim119|Shim119]] ([[User talk:Shim119|talk]]) 19:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
-:I'd be happy to take this to [[WP:AN]].  I only was upset that I was being suspected for vandalism I didn't commit.  I suspect someone was able to login from our wifi and do something I'm unaware of.  Still, I think the community deserves to know the reason zzuuzz's extreme reactions when most admins -- even those familiar the checkuser app -- often will block the IP for about a week/month or simply let the autoblock do it's job.  long term blocks often lead to collateral damage and besides, most the the IPs like the one I'm using will change over a year or so and sooner or later it won't belong to me. [[User:Shim119|Shim119]] ([[User talk:Shim119|talk]]) 20:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
-=== Statement by zzuuzz ===
-I advise [[User:Shim119|Shim119]], in their own interests, to get in touch with Arbcom privately about any particular circumstances affecting them, and I hope that Arbcom will seriously entertain what they have to say. I don't think any of their particulars would be well suited to public discussion, but anything else that's public is probably fair game. I'm happy to answer any questions, that I'm permitted to answer, or discuss many other things. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 19:39, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
-=== Statement by WaltCip ===
-No prior attempts at dispute resolution, no attempt to notify the involved parties. Nothing here to do. --'''[[User:WaltCip|⛵ <span style="color: white; font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(white, blue, navy, black)">WaltClipper</span> ]]'''-''<small>([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]])</small>'' 19:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
-=== Statement by Deepfriedokra ===
-*What Waltclip said. {{yo|Shim119}}. You should first discuss with zzuuzz. If that doesn't resolve the matter, post to [[WP:AN]]. You might want to withdraw this. [[User:Deepfriedokra|--  Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
-=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
-Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
-<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->
-=== Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Clerk notes ===
-:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
-*
-=== Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> ===
-{{anchor|1=Very brief and neutral name describing the topic of the dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
-*