Jump to content

Courtship: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
removing section 'Courtship animals' prior to creating article of that name over-riding redirect with points here
replacing 'dating' with 'courtship'
Line 7: Line 7:
{{Close Relationships|activities}}
{{Close Relationships|activities}}
{{Love sidebar|types}}
{{Love sidebar|types}}

== History ==

Courtship as a social practice is a relatively recent phenomenon, emerging only within the last few centuries. From the standpoint of [[anthropology]] and [[sociology]], courtship is linked with other institutions such as marriage and the [[family]] which have changed rapidly, having been subject to the effects of advances in technology and medicine. As humans societies have evolved from [[hunter-gatherer]]s into [[Civilization|civilized societies]], there have been substantial adjustments in relations between people, with perhaps the only remaining [[biology|biological]] constant being that a [[woman]] and [[man]] must have [[sexual intercourse]] for human procreation to happen.

Historically, marriages in most societies were [[Arranged marriage|arranged by parents]] and older relatives with the goal not being [[love]] but legacy and "economic stability and political alliances", according to [[anthropology|anthropologists]].<ref name=twsDecM11>{{cite journal
|author1=Kris Paap |author2=Douglas Raybeck |title= A Differently Gendered Landscape: Gender and Agency in the Web-based Personals
|publisher= Electronic Journal of Sociology
|quote= most marriages in the world are arranged...
|year= 2005
|citeseerx=10.1.1.107.993
}}</ref> Accordingly, there was little need for a temporary trial period such as courtship before a permanent community-recognized union was formed between a man and a woman. While pair-bonds of varying forms were recognized by most societies as acceptable social arrangements, marriage was reserved for heterosexual pairings and had a transactional nature, where wives were in many cases a form of property being exchanged between father and husband, and who would have to serve the function of reproduction. Communities exerted pressure on people to form pair-bonds in places such as [[Europe]]; in [[China]], society "demanded people get married before having a sexual relationship"<ref name=twsDecI22bb>{{cite news
|title= Parents explore dating scene for choosy children
|newspaper= China Daily
|quote= ... in earlier times society demanded people get married before having a sexual relationship.
|date= 2005-11-11
|url= http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-11/11/content_493925.htm
|access-date= 2010-12-09
}}</ref> and many societies found that some formally recognized bond between a man and a woman was the best way of rearing and educating [[child]]ren as well as helping to avoid conflicts and misunderstandings regarding competition for mates.

[[File:DickseeRomeoandJuliet.jpg|thumb|right|upright|The clandestine meeting between Romeo and Juliet in [[Romeo and Juliet|Shakespeare's play]]. Painting by [[Frank Dicksee|Sir Frank Dicksee]], 1884]]
Generally, during much of recorded history of humans in civilization, and into the [[Middle Ages]] in [[Europe]], weddings were seen as [[business]] arrangements between families, while romance was something that happened outside of marriage discreetly, such as covert meetings.<ref name=twsDecH34a /> The 12th-century book ''[[De amore (Andreas Capellanus)|The Art of Courtly Love]]'' advised that "True love can have no place between husband and wife."<ref name=twsDecH34a>{{cite news
|title= Raw dater
|newspaper= The Guardian
|quote= ..."True love can have no place between husband and wife," ...
|date= 24 January 2009
|url= https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/jan/24/dating-statistics
|access-date= 2010-12-08
}}</ref> According to one view, clandestine meetings between men and women, generally outside of marriage or before marriage, were the precursors to today's courtship.<ref name=twsDecH34a />

From about 1700 a worldwide movement perhaps described as the "empowerment of the individual" took hold, leading towards greater emancipation of women and equality of individuals. Men and women became more equal politically, financially, and socially in many nations. Women eventually won the right to vote in many countries and own property and receive [[Equality before the law|equal treatment by the law]], and these changes had profound impacts on the relationships between men and women. Parental influence declined. In many societies, individuals could decide—on their own—whether they should marry, whom they should marry, and when they should marry in a "courtship ritual where young women entertained gentleman callers, usually in the home, under the watchful eye of a [[Chaperone (social)|chaperone]],"<ref>{{cite news
|author= Brenda Wilson
|title= Sex Without Intimacy: No Dating, No Relationships
|work= National Public Radio
|quote= Dating itself ... evolved out of a courtship ritual where young women entertained gentleman callers, usually in the home, ...
|date= June 8, 2009
|url= https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105008712
|access-date= 2010-12-08
}}</ref> but increasingly, in many Western countries, it became a self-initiated activity with two young people going out as a couple in public together. Still, courtship varies considerably by nation, custom, religious upbringing, technology, and social class, and important exceptions with regards to individual freedoms remain as many countries today still practice arranged marriages, request dowries, and forbid same-sex pairings. Although in many countries, movies, meals, and meeting in coffeehouses and other places is now popular, as are advice books suggesting various strategies for men and women,<ref name=twsDecH26c>{{cite news
|author= Maureen Dowd quoting poet Dorothy Parker
|title= What's a Modern Girl to Do?
|newspaper= The New York Times
|quote= ...What our grandmothers told us about playing hard to get is true. ...
|year= 2005
|url= https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/magazine/30feminism.html
|access-date= 2010-12-08
}}</ref> in other parts of the world, such as in South Asia and many parts of the Middle East, being alone in public as a couple is not only frowned upon but can even lead to either person being socially ostracized.

The 1849 book ''The Whole Art of Polite Courtship; Or the Ladies & Gentlemen's Love Letter Writer'' exemplifies the importance of [[Love letter|love letters]] in 19th century courtship with a goal of marriage.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qrRFy1o5wKYC |title=The Whole Art of Polite Courtship; Or the Ladies & Gentlemen's Love Letter Writer: Being a Complete Collection of Information and Advice on the Subject of Love, with New Hints to be Observed for the Choice of a Husband |date=1849 |publisher=Webb. Millington & Company |language=en}}</ref> The book contains 31 love letter samples for men and women in different careers, presumably for readers to draw inspiration when writing their own romantic correspondences. [[Etiquette]] books, such as the 1852 ''Etiquette of Courtship and Matrimony,'' detail socially appropriate ways to meet lovers, date, arrange a wedding, honeymoon, and avoid arguments.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P8hYAAAAcAAJ |title=The Etiquette of Courtship and Matrimony: with a Complete Guide to the Forms of a Wedding |date=1852 |publisher=George Routledge and Son |language=en}}</ref>

In the twentieth century, courtship was sometimes seen as a precursor to marriage but it could also be considered as an end-in-itself, that is, an informal social activity akin to [[friendship]]. It generally happened in that portion of a person's life before the age of marriage,<ref name="twsDecH34b">{{cite news
|title= Raw dater
|newspaper= The Guardian
|quote= 24 was the average age for a person to get married in 1851....
|date= 24 January 2009
|url= https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/jan/24/dating-statistics
|access-date= 2010-12-08
}}</ref> but as marriage became less permanent with the advent of [[divorce]], courtship could happen at other times in peoples lives as well. People became more mobile.<ref name="twsDecH24bb">{{cite news
|author= Neil Offen
|title= Sociologists: Internet dating on the rise
|newspaper= The Herald-Sun
|quote= ..."But people are moving more now, they're not getting married at 22 and they are removed from their traditional social networks for mate selection..."
|date= February 13, 2010
|url= http://www.allbusiness.com/humanities-social-science/sociology/13922241-1.html
|access-date= 2010-12-08
}}</ref> Rapidly developing [[technology]] played a huge role: new [[communication technology]] such as the [[telephone]],<ref name="twsDecIv24">{{cite news
|author= Chester F. Jacobson
|title= A long-ago first date: More than 60 years later, would that special girl remember me?
|newspaper= Boston Globe
|quote= After the movie, Finney and I took Helen home to her mother, ....
|date= February 7, 2010
|url= http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/magazine/articles/2010/02/07/a_long_ago_first_date/
|access-date= 2010-12-09
}}</ref> [[Internet]]<ref name="twsDecH21b">{{cite news
|author= Sharon Jayson
|title= Internet changing the game of love
|newspaper= USA Today
|quote="The rise of the Internet as a way of meeting people makes a bit of an end run around family," ...
|date= 2010-02-10
|url= https://www.usatoday.com/LIFE/usaedition/2010-02-11-couplesmeet11_CV_U.htm
|access-date= 2010-12-08
}}</ref> and [[text messaging]]<ref name="twsDecNfaas" /> enabled dates to be arranged without face-to-face contact. [[effects of the automobile on societies|Cars]] extended the range of courtship as well as enabled back-seat sexual exploration.

In the mid-twentieth century, the advent of [[birth control]] as well as safer procedures for [[abortion]] changed the equation considerably, and there was less pressure to marry as a means for satisfying sexual urges. New types of relationships formed; it was possible for people to live together without marrying and without [[children]]. Information about [[human sexuality]] grew, and with it an acceptance of all types of consensual sexual orientations is becoming more common. Today, the institution of courtship continues to evolve at a rapid rate with new possibilities and choices opening up particularly through [[online dating|online courtship]].{{Citation needed|date=August 2022}}

Humans have been compared to other species in terms of sexual behavior. [[Neurobiology|Neurobiologist]] [[Robert Sapolsky]] constructed a reproductive spectrum with opposite poles being [[Display (zoology)|tournament species]], in which males compete fiercely for reproductive privileges with females, and [[pair bond]] arrangements, in which a male and female will bond for life.<ref name="twsDecM11fss">{{cite news |author=Robert Sapolsky |year=2005 |title=Biology and Human Behavior: The Neurological Origins of Individuality, 2nd edition |publisher=The Teaching Company |url=https://www.amazon.co.uk/Biology-Human-Behavior-Neurological-Individuality/dp/B00DTUY66C |access-date=2010-12-07 |quote=(lectures on CD-audio)}}</ref> According to Sapolsky, humans are somewhat in the middle of this spectrum, in the sense that humans form pair bonds, but there is the possibility of cheating or changing partners.<ref name="twsDecM11fss" /> These species-particular behavior patterns provide a context for aspects of [[human reproduction]], including courtship. However, one particularity of the human species is that pair bonds are often formed without necessarily having the intention of reproduction. In modern times, emphasis on the institution of marriage, traditionally described as a male-female bond, has obscured pair bonds formed by same-sex and transgender couples, and that many heterosexual couples also bond for life without offspring, or that often pairs that do have offspring separate. Thus, the concept of marriage is changing widely in many countries.



== Duration ==
== Duration ==
Line 17: Line 104:
The date is fairly casual in most European-influenced cultures, but in some traditional societies, courtship is a highly structured activity with very specific formal rules.
The date is fairly casual in most European-influenced cultures, but in some traditional societies, courtship is a highly structured activity with very specific formal rules.


In some societies, the parents or community propose potential partners and then allow limited dating to determine whether the parties are suited. In [[Japan]], there is such a type of courtship called [[Miai|Omiai]], with similar practices called "Xiangqin" ({{lang|zh|相親}}) in the [[Greater China Area]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Thelmaw |first=Ritgerõ |date=September 2015 |title=Courtship in Japan and Iceland |url=http://skemman.is/stream/get/1946/22794/52148/1/Ritger%C3%B0_Thelmaw.pdf |access-date=15 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160605134159/http://skemman.is/stream/get/1946/22794/52148/1/Ritger%C3%B0_Thelmaw.pdf |archive-date=5 June 2016 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Parents will hire a matchmaker to provide pictures and [[résumé]]s of potential mates, and if the couple agrees, there will be a formal meeting with the matchmaker and often parents in attendance.<ref name=":0" /> The matchmaker and parents will often exert pressure on the couple to decide whether they want to marry after a few dates.
In some societies, the parents or community propose potential partners and then allow limited courtship to determine whether the parties are suited. In [[Japan]], there is such a type of courtship called [[Miai|Omiai]], with similar practices called "Xiangqin" ({{lang|zh|相親}}) in the [[Greater China Area]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Thelmaw |first=Ritgerõ |date=September 2015 |title=Courtship in Japan and Iceland |url=http://skemman.is/stream/get/1946/22794/52148/1/Ritger%C3%B0_Thelmaw.pdf |access-date=15 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160605134159/http://skemman.is/stream/get/1946/22794/52148/1/Ritger%C3%B0_Thelmaw.pdf |archive-date=5 June 2016 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Parents will hire a matchmaker to provide pictures and [[résumé]]s of potential mates, and if the couple agrees, there will be a formal meeting with the matchmaker and often parents in attendance.<ref name=":0" /> The matchmaker and parents will often exert pressure on the couple to decide whether they want to marry after a few dates.


[[Courtship in the Philippines]] is one complex form of courtship. Unlike other societies, it takes a far more subdued and indirect approach.<ref name="phrasebase.com">{{Cite web |url=http://www.phrasebase.com/archive/tagalog/82-courtship-in-philippine-culture.html |title=COURTSHIP IN PHILIPPINE CULTURE |website=www.phrasebase.com |access-date=13 May 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200219214017/http://www.phrasebase.com/archive/tagalog/82-courtship-in-philippine-culture.html |archive-date=19 February 2020}}</ref> Its complexity involves stages, and it is considered normal for courtship to last a year or longer. It is common to see a man showing off by sending love letters and love poems, singing romantic songs, and buying gifts for a woman. The parents are also seen as part of the courtship practice, as their approval is commonly needed before courtship may begin or before the woman gives the man an answer to his advances.<ref name="phrasebase.com" />
[[Courtship in the Philippines]] is one complex form of courtship. Unlike other societies, it takes a far more subdued and indirect approach.<ref name="phrasebase.com">{{Cite web |url=http://www.phrasebase.com/archive/tagalog/82-courtship-in-philippine-culture.html |title=COURTSHIP IN PHILIPPINE CULTURE |website=www.phrasebase.com |access-date=13 May 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200219214017/http://www.phrasebase.com/archive/tagalog/82-courtship-in-philippine-culture.html |archive-date=19 February 2020}}</ref> Its complexity involves stages, and it is considered normal for courtship to last a year or longer. It is common to see a man showing off by sending love letters and love poems, singing romantic songs, and buying gifts for a woman. The parents are also seen as part of the courtship practice, as their approval is commonly needed before courtship may begin or before the woman gives the man an answer to his advances.<ref name="phrasebase.com" />
Line 23: Line 110:
In more closed societies, courtship is virtually eliminated by the practice of arranged marriages<ref name=":0" /> in which partners are chosen for young people, typically by their parents. Forbidding experimental and serial courtship and sanctioning only arranged matches is partly a means of guarding the chastity of young people and partly a matter of furthering family interests, which, in such cultures, may be considered more important than individual romantic preferences.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Reading: Marriage and Courtship Patterns {{!}} Sociology|url=https://courses.lumenlearning.com/alamo-sociology/chapter/reading-marriage-and-courtship-patterns/|access-date=28 December 2021|website=courses.lumenlearning.com}}</ref>
In more closed societies, courtship is virtually eliminated by the practice of arranged marriages<ref name=":0" /> in which partners are chosen for young people, typically by their parents. Forbidding experimental and serial courtship and sanctioning only arranged matches is partly a means of guarding the chastity of young people and partly a matter of furthering family interests, which, in such cultures, may be considered more important than individual romantic preferences.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Reading: Marriage and Courtship Patterns {{!}} Sociology|url=https://courses.lumenlearning.com/alamo-sociology/chapter/reading-marriage-and-courtship-patterns/|access-date=28 December 2021|website=courses.lumenlearning.com}}</ref>


Throughout history, courtship has often included traditions such as exchanging [[valentines]], written correspondence (facilitated by the creation of the postal service in the nineteenth century), and similar communication-based courting.<ref>{{citation | last = Maurer | first = Elizabeth | title = The History of Romance | publisher = National Women's History Museum | year = 2017 | url = https://www.womenshistory.org/articles/history-romance}}.</ref> Over recent decades, though, the concept of arranged marriage has changed or simply been mixed with other forms of dating, including Eastern and Indian ones. Potential couples have the opportunity to meet and date each other before deciding whether to continue the relationship.
Throughout history, courtship has often included traditions such as exchanging [[valentines]], written correspondence (facilitated by the creation of the postal service in the nineteenth century), and similar communication-based courting.<ref>{{citation | last = Maurer | first = Elizabeth | title = The History of Romance | publisher = National Women's History Museum | year = 2017 | url = https://www.womenshistory.org/articles/history-romance}}.</ref> Over recent decades, though, the concept of arranged marriage has changed or simply been mixed with other forms of courtship, including Eastern and Indian ones. Potential couples have the opportunity to meet and date each other before deciding whether to continue the relationship.


==Modern people==
==Modern people==
{{Main|Dating}}
{{Main|Dating}}
In the early 1800s, young adults were expected{{where?|date=June 2021}} to court with the intention of finding a marriage partner, rather than for social reasons. In more traditional forms of Christianity, this concept of courtship has been retained, with the period of courtship beginning after the [[Engagement#Christianity|Rite of Betrothal]] and concluding with the celebration of [[Christian views on marriage|marriage]].<ref name="Weller1948"/><ref name="Maxson2012">{{cite book |last1=Maxson |first1=J. Robin |title=Singleness, Marriage, and the Will of God: A Comprehensive Biblical Guide |date=2012 |publisher=Harvest House Publishers |isbn=978-0-7369-4549-3 |page=326 |language=English |quote=In the ''courtship'' paradigm, the prospect of marriage is broached toward the beginning of the process and romance is postponed until the couple is out in the middle of the bridge. One of the major objectives of the ''betrothal'' arrangement is to stave off romance as long as possible—until the period just before the wedding or, following the biblical pattern, after it. Proponents of courthsip and betrothal are very aware of the twitterpating effects of romance on sound judgment, so they seek a structure that delays that influence on the decision-making process as long as possible.}}</ref> Christian theologian [[John Piper (theologian)|John Piper]] distinguished courtship from dating, teaching that:<ref name="PiperTaylor2005">{{cite book |last1=Piper |first1=John |last2=Taylor |first2=Justin |title=Sex and the Supremacy of Christ |date=14 June 2005 |publisher=Crossway |isbn=9781433517907 |page=146}}<!--|access-date=4 July 2015--></ref>
In the early 1800s, young adults were expected{{where?|date=June 2021}} to court with the intention of finding a marriage partner, rather than for social reasons. In more traditional forms of Christianity, this concept of courtship has been retained, with the period of courtship beginning after the [[Engagement#Christianity|Rite of Betrothal]] and concluding with the celebration of [[Christian views on marriage|marriage]].<ref name="Weller1948"/><ref name="Maxson2012">{{cite book |last1=Maxson |first1=J. Robin |title=Singleness, Marriage, and the Will of God: A Comprehensive Biblical Guide |date=2012 |publisher=Harvest House Publishers |isbn=978-0-7369-4549-3 |page=326 |language=English |quote=In the ''courtship'' paradigm, the prospect of marriage is broached toward the beginning of the process and romance is postponed until the couple is out in the middle of the bridge. One of the major objectives of the ''betrothal'' arrangement is to stave off romance as long as possible—until the period just before the wedding or, following the biblical pattern, after it. Proponents of courthsip and betrothal are very aware of the twitterpating effects of romance on sound judgment, so they seek a structure that delays that influence on the decision-making process as long as possible.}}</ref> American Christian theologian [[John Piper (theologian)|John Piper]] distinguished courtship from [[dating]], teaching that:<ref name="PiperTaylor2005">{{cite book |last1=Piper |first1=John |last2=Taylor |first2=Justin |title=Sex and the Supremacy of Christ |date=14 June 2005 |publisher=Crossway |isbn=9781433517907 |page=146}}<!--|access-date=4 July 2015--></ref>
{{blockquote|Courtship ordinarily begins when a single man approaches a single woman by going through the woman's father, and then conducts his relationship with the woman under the authority of her father, family, or church, whichever is most appropriate. Courtship always has marriage as its direct goal... Dating, a more modern approach, begins when either the man or the woman initiates a more-than-friends relationship with the other, and then they conduct that relationship outside of any oversight or authority. Dating may or may not have marriage as its goal.}}
{{blockquote|Courtship ordinarily begins when a single man approaches a single woman by going through the woman's father, and then conducts his relationship with the woman under the authority of her father, family, or church, whichever is most appropriate. Courtship always has marriage as its direct goal... Dating, a more modern approach, begins when either the man or the woman initiates a more-than-friends relationship with the other, and then they conduct that relationship outside of any oversight or authority. Dating may or may not have marriage as its goal.}}
[[Minister (Christianity)|Christian minister]] Patricia Bootsma delineates this distinction, writing that in contrast to the modern conception of dating, in "courtship, time together in groups with family or friends is encouraged, and there is oversight by and accountability to parents or mentors".<ref name="Bootsma2015" /> She further states that with courtship, "commitment happens before intimacy".<ref name="Bootsma2015">{{cite book |last=Bootsma |first=Patricia |title=Raising Burning Hearts: Parenting and Mentoring Next Generation Lovers of God |date=9 April 2015 |publisher=Forerunner Publishing |isbn=9781938060229 |page=81}}<!--|access-date=5 July 2015--></ref>
[[Minister (Christianity)|Christian minister]] Patricia Bootsma delineates this distinction, writing that in contrast to the modern conception of dating, in "courtship, time together in groups with family or friends is encouraged, and there is oversight by and accountability to parents or mentors".<ref name="Bootsma2015" /> She further states that with courtship, "commitment happens before intimacy".<ref name="Bootsma2015">{{cite book |last=Bootsma |first=Patricia |title=Raising Burning Hearts: Parenting and Mentoring Next Generation Lovers of God |date=9 April 2015 |publisher=Forerunner Publishing |isbn=9781938060229 |page=81}}<!--|access-date=5 July 2015--></ref>
Line 34: Line 121:


===Courtship in social theory===
===Courtship in social theory===
Courtship is used by a number of theorists to explain gendering processes and sexual identity. Scientific research into courtship began in the 1980s, after which time academic researchers started to generate theories about modern dating practices and norms. Researchers have found that, contrary to popular beliefs, courtship is normally triggered and controlled by women,<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Cohen | first1 = L. L. | last2 = Shotland | first2 = R. L. | year = 1996 | title = Timing of first sexual intercourse in a relationship: Expectations, experiences, and perceptions of others | journal = Journal of Sex Research | volume = 33 | issue = 4 | pages = 291–299 | doi = 10.1080/00224499609551846}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Simpson | first1 = J. A. | last2 = Gangestad | first2 = S. W. | year = 1992 | title = Sociosexuality and Romantic Partner Choice | journal = Journal of Personality | volume = 60 | pages = 31–51 | doi = 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x}}</ref><ref>Perper, T. (1985) ''Sex Signals: The Biology Of Love'', Philadelphia, ISI Press.</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Moore | first1 = N. | year = 1985 | title = Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: contact and consequences | url = https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246974326 | journal = Ethology and Sociobiology | volume = 6 | issue = 4 | pages = 237–247 | doi=10.1016/0162-3095(85)90016-0}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Peplau | first1 = L. A. | last2 = Rubin | first2 = Z. | last3 = Hill | first3 = C. T. | year = 1977 | title = Sexual Intimacy in Dating Relationships | journal = Journal of Social Issues | volume = 33 | issue = 2 | pages = 86–109 | doi= 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb02007.x}}</ref> driven mainly by non-verbal behaviours, to which men respond. One of the functions of romantic love is courtship.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bode|first1=Adam|last2=Kushnick|first2=Geoff|date=2021|title=Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love|journal=Frontiers in Psychology|language=English|volume=12|page=573123|doi=10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573123|pmid=33912094|issn=1664-1078|pmc=8074860|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Courtship is used by a number of theorists to explain gendering processes and sexual identity. Scientific research into courtship began in the 1980s, after which time academic researchers started to generate theories about modern courtship practices and norms. Researchers have found that, contrary to popular beliefs, courtship is normally triggered and controlled by women,<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Cohen | first1 = L. L. | last2 = Shotland | first2 = R. L. | year = 1996 | title = Timing of first sexual intercourse in a relationship: Expectations, experiences, and perceptions of others | journal = Journal of Sex Research | volume = 33 | issue = 4 | pages = 291–299 | doi = 10.1080/00224499609551846}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Simpson | first1 = J. A. | last2 = Gangestad | first2 = S. W. | year = 1992 | title = Sociosexuality and Romantic Partner Choice | journal = Journal of Personality | volume = 60 | pages = 31–51 | doi = 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x}}</ref><ref>Perper, T. (1985) ''Sex Signals: The Biology Of Love'', Philadelphia, ISI Press.</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Moore | first1 = N. | year = 1985 | title = Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: contact and consequences | url = https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246974326 | journal = Ethology and Sociobiology | volume = 6 | issue = 4 | pages = 237–247 | doi=10.1016/0162-3095(85)90016-0}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Peplau | first1 = L. A. | last2 = Rubin | first2 = Z. | last3 = Hill | first3 = C. T. | year = 1977 | title = Sexual Intimacy in Dating Relationships | journal = Journal of Social Issues | volume = 33 | issue = 2 | pages = 86–109 | doi= 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb02007.x}}</ref> driven mainly by non-verbal behaviours, to which men respond. One of the functions of romantic love is courtship.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Bode|first1=Adam|last2=Kushnick|first2=Geoff|date=2021|title=Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love|journal=Frontiers in Psychology|language=English|volume=12|page=573123|doi=10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573123|pmid=33912094|issn=1664-1078|pmc=8074860|doi-access=free}}</ref>


This is generally supported by other theorists who specialise in the study of body language.<ref>Pease, A. and Pease, B. (2004) ''The Definitive Book Of Body Language'', London: Orion Books.</ref> There are some feminist scholars, however, who regard courtship as a socially constructed (and male-led) process organised to subjugate women.<ref>Hearn, J. & Parkin, W. (1987) ''Sex at work: The power and paradox of organisation sexuality'', Brighton: Wheatsheaf.</ref><ref>Connell, R. W. (1995) ''Gender and Power'', Cambridge: Polity Press.</ref> Farrell reports, for example, that magazines about marriage and romantic fiction continue to attract a 98% female readership.<ref>Farrell, W. (2000) ''Women Can’t Hear What Men Don’t Say'', New York: Tarcher/Putnam.</ref> Systematic research into courtship processes inside the workplace<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Williams | first1 = C. L. | last2 = Guiffre | first2 = P. A. | last3 = Dellinger | first3 = K. | s2cid = 145150846 | year = 1999 | title = Sexuality in the Workplace: Organizational Control, Sexual Harassment and the Pursuit of Pleasure | journal = Annual Review of Sociology | volume = 25 | pages = 73–93 | doi=10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.73}}</ref> as well two ten-year studies examining norms in different international settings<ref>Molloy, J. (2003) ''Why Men Marry Some Women and Not Others'', London: Element.</ref><ref>Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., BruchonSchweittzer, M. [& 45 additional authors] (1990). "[https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/67686/10.1177_0022022190211001.pdf?sequence=2 International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 societies]". ''Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology'', 21: 5–47.</ref> continue to support a view that courtship is a social process that socialises ''both'' sexes into accepting forms of relationship that maximise the chances of successfully raising children.
This is generally supported by other theorists who specialise in the study of body language.<ref>Pease, A. and Pease, B. (2004) ''The Definitive Book Of Body Language'', London: Orion Books.</ref> There are some feminist scholars, however, who regard courtship as a socially constructed (and male-led) process organised to subjugate women.<ref>Hearn, J. & Parkin, W. (1987) ''Sex at work: The power and paradox of organisation sexuality'', Brighton: Wheatsheaf.</ref><ref>Connell, R. W. (1995) ''Gender and Power'', Cambridge: Polity Press.</ref> Farrell reports, for example, that magazines about marriage and romantic fiction continue to attract a 98% female readership.<ref>Farrell, W. (2000) ''Women Can’t Hear What Men Don’t Say'', New York: Tarcher/Putnam.</ref> Systematic research into courtship processes inside the workplace<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Williams | first1 = C. L. | last2 = Guiffre | first2 = P. A. | last3 = Dellinger | first3 = K. | s2cid = 145150846 | year = 1999 | title = Sexuality in the Workplace: Organizational Control, Sexual Harassment and the Pursuit of Pleasure | journal = Annual Review of Sociology | volume = 25 | pages = 73–93 | doi=10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.73}}</ref> as well two ten-year studies examining norms in different international settings<ref>Molloy, J. (2003) ''Why Men Marry Some Women and Not Others'', London: Element.</ref><ref>Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., BruchonSchweittzer, M. [& 45 additional authors] (1990). "[https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/67686/10.1177_0022022190211001.pdf?sequence=2 International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 societies]". ''Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology'', 21: 5–47.</ref> continue to support a view that courtship is a social process that socialises ''both'' sexes into accepting forms of relationship that maximise the chances of successfully raising children.

Revision as of 07:16, 15 March 2023

God Speed by English artist Edmund Leighton, 1900: depicting an armored knight departing for war and leaving behind his wife or sweetheart.

Courtship is the period wherein some couples get to know each other prior to a possible marriage. Courtship traditionally may begin after a betrothal and may conclude with the celebration of marriage.[1] A courtship may be an informal and private matter between two people or may be a public affair, or a formal arrangement with family approval. Traditionally, in the case of a formal engagement, it is the role of a male to actively "court" or "woo" a female, thus encouraging her to understand him and her receptiveness to a marriage proposal.

History

Courtship as a social practice is a relatively recent phenomenon, emerging only within the last few centuries. From the standpoint of anthropology and sociology, courtship is linked with other institutions such as marriage and the family which have changed rapidly, having been subject to the effects of advances in technology and medicine. As humans societies have evolved from hunter-gatherers into civilized societies, there have been substantial adjustments in relations between people, with perhaps the only remaining biological constant being that a woman and man must have sexual intercourse for human procreation to happen.

Historically, marriages in most societies were arranged by parents and older relatives with the goal not being love but legacy and "economic stability and political alliances", according to anthropologists.[2] Accordingly, there was little need for a temporary trial period such as courtship before a permanent community-recognized union was formed between a man and a woman. While pair-bonds of varying forms were recognized by most societies as acceptable social arrangements, marriage was reserved for heterosexual pairings and had a transactional nature, where wives were in many cases a form of property being exchanged between father and husband, and who would have to serve the function of reproduction. Communities exerted pressure on people to form pair-bonds in places such as Europe; in China, society "demanded people get married before having a sexual relationship"[3] and many societies found that some formally recognized bond between a man and a woman was the best way of rearing and educating children as well as helping to avoid conflicts and misunderstandings regarding competition for mates.

The clandestine meeting between Romeo and Juliet in Shakespeare's play. Painting by Sir Frank Dicksee, 1884

Generally, during much of recorded history of humans in civilization, and into the Middle Ages in Europe, weddings were seen as business arrangements between families, while romance was something that happened outside of marriage discreetly, such as covert meetings.[4] The 12th-century book The Art of Courtly Love advised that "True love can have no place between husband and wife."[4] According to one view, clandestine meetings between men and women, generally outside of marriage or before marriage, were the precursors to today's courtship.[4]

From about 1700 a worldwide movement perhaps described as the "empowerment of the individual" took hold, leading towards greater emancipation of women and equality of individuals. Men and women became more equal politically, financially, and socially in many nations. Women eventually won the right to vote in many countries and own property and receive equal treatment by the law, and these changes had profound impacts on the relationships between men and women. Parental influence declined. In many societies, individuals could decide—on their own—whether they should marry, whom they should marry, and when they should marry in a "courtship ritual where young women entertained gentleman callers, usually in the home, under the watchful eye of a chaperone,"[5] but increasingly, in many Western countries, it became a self-initiated activity with two young people going out as a couple in public together. Still, courtship varies considerably by nation, custom, religious upbringing, technology, and social class, and important exceptions with regards to individual freedoms remain as many countries today still practice arranged marriages, request dowries, and forbid same-sex pairings. Although in many countries, movies, meals, and meeting in coffeehouses and other places is now popular, as are advice books suggesting various strategies for men and women,[6] in other parts of the world, such as in South Asia and many parts of the Middle East, being alone in public as a couple is not only frowned upon but can even lead to either person being socially ostracized.

The 1849 book The Whole Art of Polite Courtship; Or the Ladies & Gentlemen's Love Letter Writer exemplifies the importance of love letters in 19th century courtship with a goal of marriage.[7] The book contains 31 love letter samples for men and women in different careers, presumably for readers to draw inspiration when writing their own romantic correspondences. Etiquette books, such as the 1852 Etiquette of Courtship and Matrimony, detail socially appropriate ways to meet lovers, date, arrange a wedding, honeymoon, and avoid arguments.[8]

In the twentieth century, courtship was sometimes seen as a precursor to marriage but it could also be considered as an end-in-itself, that is, an informal social activity akin to friendship. It generally happened in that portion of a person's life before the age of marriage,[9] but as marriage became less permanent with the advent of divorce, courtship could happen at other times in peoples lives as well. People became more mobile.[10] Rapidly developing technology played a huge role: new communication technology such as the telephone,[11] Internet[12] and text messaging[13] enabled dates to be arranged without face-to-face contact. Cars extended the range of courtship as well as enabled back-seat sexual exploration.

In the mid-twentieth century, the advent of birth control as well as safer procedures for abortion changed the equation considerably, and there was less pressure to marry as a means for satisfying sexual urges. New types of relationships formed; it was possible for people to live together without marrying and without children. Information about human sexuality grew, and with it an acceptance of all types of consensual sexual orientations is becoming more common. Today, the institution of courtship continues to evolve at a rapid rate with new possibilities and choices opening up particularly through online courtship.[citation needed]

Humans have been compared to other species in terms of sexual behavior. Neurobiologist Robert Sapolsky constructed a reproductive spectrum with opposite poles being tournament species, in which males compete fiercely for reproductive privileges with females, and pair bond arrangements, in which a male and female will bond for life.[14] According to Sapolsky, humans are somewhat in the middle of this spectrum, in the sense that humans form pair bonds, but there is the possibility of cheating or changing partners.[14] These species-particular behavior patterns provide a context for aspects of human reproduction, including courtship. However, one particularity of the human species is that pair bonds are often formed without necessarily having the intention of reproduction. In modern times, emphasis on the institution of marriage, traditionally described as a male-female bond, has obscured pair bonds formed by same-sex and transgender couples, and that many heterosexual couples also bond for life without offspring, or that often pairs that do have offspring separate. Thus, the concept of marriage is changing widely in many countries.


Duration

"Southern Courtship" by American painter Eastman Johnson (1824–1906)

The average duration of courtship varies considerably throughout the world. Furthermore, there is vast individual variation between couples. Courtship may be completely omitted, as in cases of some arranged marriages where the couple do not meet before the wedding.

In the United Kingdom, a poll of 3,000[15] engaged or married couples resulted in an average duration between first meeting and accepted proposal of marriage of 2 years and 11 months,[15][16] with the women feeling ready to accept at an average of 2 years and 7 months.[15] Regarding duration between proposal and wedding, the UK poll above gave an average of 2 years and 3 months.[16]

Traditions

The date is fairly casual in most European-influenced cultures, but in some traditional societies, courtship is a highly structured activity with very specific formal rules.

In some societies, the parents or community propose potential partners and then allow limited courtship to determine whether the parties are suited. In Japan, there is such a type of courtship called Omiai, with similar practices called "Xiangqin" (相親) in the Greater China Area.[7] Parents will hire a matchmaker to provide pictures and résumés of potential mates, and if the couple agrees, there will be a formal meeting with the matchmaker and often parents in attendance.[7] The matchmaker and parents will often exert pressure on the couple to decide whether they want to marry after a few dates.

Courtship in the Philippines is one complex form of courtship. Unlike other societies, it takes a far more subdued and indirect approach.[17] Its complexity involves stages, and it is considered normal for courtship to last a year or longer. It is common to see a man showing off by sending love letters and love poems, singing romantic songs, and buying gifts for a woman. The parents are also seen as part of the courtship practice, as their approval is commonly needed before courtship may begin or before the woman gives the man an answer to his advances.[17]

In more closed societies, courtship is virtually eliminated by the practice of arranged marriages[7] in which partners are chosen for young people, typically by their parents. Forbidding experimental and serial courtship and sanctioning only arranged matches is partly a means of guarding the chastity of young people and partly a matter of furthering family interests, which, in such cultures, may be considered more important than individual romantic preferences.[18]

Throughout history, courtship has often included traditions such as exchanging valentines, written correspondence (facilitated by the creation of the postal service in the nineteenth century), and similar communication-based courting.[19] Over recent decades, though, the concept of arranged marriage has changed or simply been mixed with other forms of courtship, including Eastern and Indian ones. Potential couples have the opportunity to meet and date each other before deciding whether to continue the relationship.

Modern people

In the early 1800s, young adults were expected[where?] to court with the intention of finding a marriage partner, rather than for social reasons. In more traditional forms of Christianity, this concept of courtship has been retained, with the period of courtship beginning after the Rite of Betrothal and concluding with the celebration of marriage.[1][20] American Christian theologian John Piper distinguished courtship from dating, teaching that:[21]

Courtship ordinarily begins when a single man approaches a single woman by going through the woman's father, and then conducts his relationship with the woman under the authority of her father, family, or church, whichever is most appropriate. Courtship always has marriage as its direct goal... Dating, a more modern approach, begins when either the man or the woman initiates a more-than-friends relationship with the other, and then they conduct that relationship outside of any oversight or authority. Dating may or may not have marriage as its goal.

Christian minister Patricia Bootsma delineates this distinction, writing that in contrast to the modern conception of dating, in "courtship, time together in groups with family or friends is encouraged, and there is oversight by and accountability to parents or mentors".[22] She further states that with courtship, "commitment happens before intimacy".[22]

In America, in the 1820s, the phrase "date" was most closely associated with prostitution. However, by the Jazz Age of the 1920s, dating for fun was becoming a cultural expectation, and by the 1930s, it was assumed that any popular young person would have many dates. This form of dating was usually conducted in public places, before pre-marital sex became more socially acceptable after the sexual revolution in the 1960s.[23]

Courtship in social theory

Courtship is used by a number of theorists to explain gendering processes and sexual identity. Scientific research into courtship began in the 1980s, after which time academic researchers started to generate theories about modern courtship practices and norms. Researchers have found that, contrary to popular beliefs, courtship is normally triggered and controlled by women,[24][25][26][27][28] driven mainly by non-verbal behaviours, to which men respond. One of the functions of romantic love is courtship.[29]

This is generally supported by other theorists who specialise in the study of body language.[30] There are some feminist scholars, however, who regard courtship as a socially constructed (and male-led) process organised to subjugate women.[31][32] Farrell reports, for example, that magazines about marriage and romantic fiction continue to attract a 98% female readership.[33] Systematic research into courtship processes inside the workplace[34] as well two ten-year studies examining norms in different international settings[35][36] continue to support a view that courtship is a social process that socialises both sexes into accepting forms of relationship that maximise the chances of successfully raising children.

Commercial dating services

As technology progressed the dating world progressed as well. In a Time-line by Metro, a statistic match-making business opened in 1941, the first reality TV dating show was developed in 1965, and by the 1980s the public was introduced to video dating.[37] Video dating was a way for singles to sit in front of a camera and tell whoever may be watching something about themselves. The process of elimination was significant because now the viewer was able hear their voice, see their face and watch their body language to determine a physical attraction to the candidates.

In online dating, individuals create profiles where they disclose personal information, photographs, hobbies, interests, religion and expectations. Then the user can search through hundreds of thousands of accounts and connect with multiple people at once which in return, gives the user more options and more opportunity to find what meets their standards. Online dating has influenced the idea of choice. In Modern Romance: An Investigation, Aziz Ansari states that one third of marriages in the United States between 2005 and 2012 met through online dating services.[38] Today there are hundreds of sites to choose from and websites designed to fit specific needs such as Match, eHarmony, OkCupid, Zoosk, and ChristianMingle. Mobile apps, such as Grindr and Tinder allow users to upload profiles that are then judged by others on the service; one can either swipe right on a profile (indicating interest) or swipe left (which presents another possible mate).

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Pilip T. Weller (1948). Rite of Betrothal. Society of Saint Pius X. p. 2.
  2. ^ Kris Paap; Douglas Raybeck (2005). "A Differently Gendered Landscape: Gender and Agency in the Web-based Personals". Electronic Journal of Sociology. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.107.993. most marriages in the world are arranged... {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ "Parents explore dating scene for choosy children". China Daily. 2005-11-11. Retrieved 2010-12-09. ... in earlier times society demanded people get married before having a sexual relationship.
  4. ^ a b c "Raw dater". The Guardian. 24 January 2009. Retrieved 2010-12-08. ..."True love can have no place between husband and wife," ...
  5. ^ Brenda Wilson (June 8, 2009). "Sex Without Intimacy: No Dating, No Relationships". National Public Radio. Retrieved 2010-12-08. Dating itself ... evolved out of a courtship ritual where young women entertained gentleman callers, usually in the home, ...
  6. ^ Maureen Dowd quoting poet Dorothy Parker (2005). "What's a Modern Girl to Do?". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-12-08. ...What our grandmothers told us about playing hard to get is true. ...
  7. ^ a b c d The Whole Art of Polite Courtship; Or the Ladies & Gentlemen's Love Letter Writer: Being a Complete Collection of Information and Advice on the Subject of Love, with New Hints to be Observed for the Choice of a Husband. Webb. Millington & Company. 1849. Cite error: The named reference ":0" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  8. ^ The Etiquette of Courtship and Matrimony: with a Complete Guide to the Forms of a Wedding. George Routledge and Son. 1852.
  9. ^ "Raw dater". The Guardian. 24 January 2009. Retrieved 2010-12-08. 24 was the average age for a person to get married in 1851....
  10. ^ Neil Offen (February 13, 2010). "Sociologists: Internet dating on the rise". The Herald-Sun. Retrieved 2010-12-08. ..."But people are moving more now, they're not getting married at 22 and they are removed from their traditional social networks for mate selection..."
  11. ^ Chester F. Jacobson (February 7, 2010). "A long-ago first date: More than 60 years later, would that special girl remember me?". Boston Globe. Retrieved 2010-12-09. After the movie, Finney and I took Helen home to her mother, ....
  12. ^ Sharon Jayson (2010-02-10). "Internet changing the game of love". USA Today. Retrieved 2010-12-08. "The rise of the Internet as a way of meeting people makes a bit of an end run around family," ...
  13. ^ Cite error: The named reference twsDecNfaas was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  14. ^ a b Robert Sapolsky (2005). "Biology and Human Behavior: The Neurological Origins of Individuality, 2nd edition". The Teaching Company. Retrieved 2010-12-07. (lectures on CD-audio)
  15. ^ a b c "Average man proposes after three years", Marie Claire, 18 February 2008.
  16. ^ a b "Average man takes 3 years to propose", Metrosexual, Sunday, 17 February 2008.
  17. ^ a b "COURTSHIP IN PHILIPPINE CULTURE". www.phrasebase.com. Archived from the original on 19 February 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
  18. ^ "Reading: Marriage and Courtship Patterns | Sociology". courses.lumenlearning.com. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  19. ^ Maurer, Elizabeth (2017), The History of Romance, National Women's History Museum.
  20. ^ Maxson, J. Robin (2012). Singleness, Marriage, and the Will of God: A Comprehensive Biblical Guide. Harvest House Publishers. p. 326. ISBN 978-0-7369-4549-3. In the courtship paradigm, the prospect of marriage is broached toward the beginning of the process and romance is postponed until the couple is out in the middle of the bridge. One of the major objectives of the betrothal arrangement is to stave off romance as long as possible—until the period just before the wedding or, following the biblical pattern, after it. Proponents of courthsip and betrothal are very aware of the twitterpating effects of romance on sound judgment, so they seek a structure that delays that influence on the decision-making process as long as possible.
  21. ^ Piper, John; Taylor, Justin (14 June 2005). Sex and the Supremacy of Christ. Crossway. p. 146. ISBN 9781433517907.
  22. ^ a b Bootsma, Patricia (9 April 2015). Raising Burning Hearts: Parenting and Mentoring Next Generation Lovers of God. Forerunner Publishing. p. 81. ISBN 9781938060229.
  23. ^ The Invention of Dating.
  24. ^ Cohen, L. L.; Shotland, R. L. (1996). "Timing of first sexual intercourse in a relationship: Expectations, experiences, and perceptions of others". Journal of Sex Research. 33 (4): 291–299. doi:10.1080/00224499609551846.
  25. ^ Simpson, J. A.; Gangestad, S. W. (1992). "Sociosexuality and Romantic Partner Choice". Journal of Personality. 60: 31–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x.
  26. ^ Perper, T. (1985) Sex Signals: The Biology Of Love, Philadelphia, ISI Press.
  27. ^ Moore, N. (1985). "Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: contact and consequences". Ethology and Sociobiology. 6 (4): 237–247. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(85)90016-0.
  28. ^ Peplau, L. A.; Rubin, Z.; Hill, C. T. (1977). "Sexual Intimacy in Dating Relationships". Journal of Social Issues. 33 (2): 86–109. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb02007.x.
  29. ^ Bode, Adam; Kushnick, Geoff (2021). "Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love". Frontiers in Psychology. 12: 573123. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573123. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 8074860. PMID 33912094.
  30. ^ Pease, A. and Pease, B. (2004) The Definitive Book Of Body Language, London: Orion Books.
  31. ^ Hearn, J. & Parkin, W. (1987) Sex at work: The power and paradox of organisation sexuality, Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
  32. ^ Connell, R. W. (1995) Gender and Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  33. ^ Farrell, W. (2000) Women Can’t Hear What Men Don’t Say, New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
  34. ^ Williams, C. L.; Guiffre, P. A.; Dellinger, K. (1999). "Sexuality in the Workplace: Organizational Control, Sexual Harassment and the Pursuit of Pleasure". Annual Review of Sociology. 25: 73–93. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.73. S2CID 145150846.
  35. ^ Molloy, J. (2003) Why Men Marry Some Women and Not Others, London: Element.
  36. ^ Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., BruchonSchweittzer, M. [& 45 additional authors] (1990). "International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 societies". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21: 5–47.
  37. ^ Mulshine, Molly. "The 80s version of Tinder was 'video dating' — and it looks incredibly awkward". Tech Insider.
  38. ^ Ansari, Aziz (2015). Modern Romance. New York, New York: Penguin Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-1-59420-627-6.

Further reading

  • Moira Weigel (2016). Labor of Love: The Invention of Dating. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 978-0374182533.

External links