User talk:Rotideypoc41352: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:30, 29 June 2022

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7

Question from Crtn32002 on Module:GHS phrases/sandbox (12:45, 6 June 2022)

I could use some help with this I would like to learn more. --Crtn32002 (talk) 12:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that depends on what you want to do. What are you trying to use Module:GHS phrases for? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question from GiGiDiazLIVE (18:36, 8 June 2022)

Hello there was a change made to the GiGi Diaz page adding my education and new business information but someone blocked the change and the edit never published. They went on the "talk" part of the page and said the change was "dreadful." haha. I wanted to add citations etc but how do not get it blocked by someone else? --GiGiDiazLIVE (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Judiciary of Ethiopia

It is instant page please how long should AfD review take in Draft:Judiciary of Ethiopia? The Supermind (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

tl;dr That depends on when other independent reliable secondary sources are added to the draft. Notes to self below:

I put the Articles for Creation (AfC) template up to give myself some time to think on the draft and for the Find sources quicklinks.

The goal of AfC is to minimize the number of articles that go to Articles for Deletion (AfD). (We can discuss how successful it is another time.) Anything that would survive AfD should pass AfC regardless of quality.

The topic, the judiciary of a sovereign nation, meets criteria for a standalone article and so would almost certainly survive AfD. The problem is that this hypothetical AfD discussion may result in draftify instead of keep to incubate the draft until it is fit enough for article space. The draft sorely lacks secondary sources—anything that isn't a statement on the law itself (primary source) is analysis from a single source, Estifanos 2021. That is extremely suspect—a shoe-in draft should give readers a good sense of scholarly consensus, especially with something as well-discussed as the judiciary of Ethiopia.

I suspect the page movers watching the technical move requests board may be hesitating for similar reasons. I can try my hand at improving draft sourcing...when I have access to a library computer that may or may not allow me to read paywalled journal articles. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RM Greeks in Russia

Hi Rotideypoc41352, thanks for closing the RM at Talk:Greeks in Russia and the Soviet Union#Requested move 16 May 2022. However, it is not clear what the outcome was, since "split" is not one of the WP:THREEOUTCOMES. Since you say there is a consensus to move to the modern-day country name, should it be moved as proposed to Greeks in Russia? Thanks. Vpab15 (talk) 13:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 :The topic, the judiciary of a sovereign nation, meets [[WP:GNG|criteria for a standalone article]] and so would almost certainly survive AfD. The problem is that this hypothetical AfD discussion may result in '''draftify''' instead of '''keep''' to incubate the draft until it is fit enough for article space. The draft sorely lacks secondary sources—anything that isn't a statement on the law itself (primary source) is analysis from a single source, Estifanos 2021. That is extremely suspect—a shoe-in draft should give readers a good sense of scholarly consensus, especially with something as well-discussed as the judiciary of Ethiopia.
 :I suspect the page movers watching the technical move requests board may be hesitating for similar reasons. I can try my hand at improving draft sourcing...when I have access to a library computer that may or may not allow me to read paywalled journal articles. [[User:Rotideypoc41352|Rotideypoc41352]] ([[User talk:Rotideypoc41352|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/Rotideypoc41352|contribs]]) 21:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
+== RM Greeks in Russia  ==
+Hi Rotideypoc41352, thanks for closing the RM at [[Talk:Greeks in Russia and the Soviet Union#Requested move 16 May 2022]]. However, it is not clear what the outcome was, since "split" is not one of the [[WP:THREEOUTCOMES]]. Since you say there is a consensus to move to the modern-day country name, should it be moved as proposed to [[Greeks in Russia]]? Thanks. [[User:Vpab15|Vpab15]] ([[User talk:Vpab15|talk]]) 13:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)