User talk:Guerillero

I-ban

Hey Guerillero,

Several weeks ago I started a discussion at Jan Żaryn which centers around one of my edits. A person who has a 2-way I-ban with me (which you imposed) participated in the discussion, commenting several times on my proposals and on the discussion itself. I don't believe persons who are banned from interacting with me are allowed to opine on my proposals, count themselves towards a consensus on my proposals, or opine on someone's analysis of sources that I brought to the table. If I ask a question and you reply with "I agree with what John wrote", then you're replying to my question whether you say so explicitly or not.

What do you think of this? François Robere (talk) 19:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

From what I can tell GizzyCatBella edited the article before you did. On talk they've only responded to other editors, not you. However, strangely enough, one of these editors, one who agrees with you about everything, Mhorg, always seems to bring up your name in their replies to Gizzy. Weird, huh? It's ... as if... they wanted Gizzy to respond to a comment that has your username in it or something. On purpose. Volunteer Marek 06:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

• Volunteer Marek, the last time you approached Guerillero was in 2014.[1] How did you learn about my message?
• WP:IBAN forbids making references to an editor one is banned from interacting with. That's my thread, these are my proposals; saying "we don't have consensus" or "I agree with Marek" - about what? About this! That's a blunt IBAN violation however you turn it
• What Mhorg does or doesn't do has nothing to do with this, but for the record - your accusation is factually incorrect. They've only done it twice,[2][3] and in both cases they were on-point. As for you - you've been asked to avoid making bad faith accusations twice in the last month alone,[4][5] yet here you are. François Robere (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

I have Guerillero on my watchlist cuz they a big shot around here, obviously, and chances that someone will go running to them agitatin’ for a sanction in bad faith are high. GCB didn’t make any references to you. GCB edited that article first before you swooped in and tried to “carve it out” as yours. And Mhorg doing it “only twice” is hardly a good argument. And when you’re here yourself making bad faith accusations you’re not really in a position to complain about people complaining, are you? Volunteer Marek 12:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)