Jump to content

User talk:Sucker for All: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ok??
Line 49: Line 49:


I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --[[User:Hipal|Hipal]] ([[User talk:Hipal|talk]]) 00:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --[[User:Hipal|Hipal]] ([[User talk:Hipal|talk]]) 00:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
:I know that I was 100% right about [[talk:Sean Conley]] not being White House Physician anymore. And I will continue to abide by [[WP:BLP]], even when others want to just cite primary sources. My old account actually had more edits than you, so while I believe of course in [[WP:AGF]], when users do Not add posts to the talk page, and do Not cite reliable sources, I plan to continue being a benefit to the wikipedia community. Rather than berate me, even if that was not your intent, let's talk specifics. Help me make the [[User:Sucker for All/Ashley Strohmier]] page. I also made the [[Todd Piro]] page. If you would like to help make Ashley Strohmier, {{u|Hipal}}, I will assume your edit on my talk page, rather than the specific topic in question ([[Seema Verma]]??), was in fact done with the best of intentions. [[User:Sucker for All|Sucker for All]] ([[User talk:Sucker for All#top|talk]]) 21:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:54, 19 February 2021

Happy to talk here, but mostly let's redirect to the article's talk page first. That way everyone sees the discussion, and the community benefits. Sucker for All (talk) 01:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Sucker for All! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! AcebulfALT (talk) 20:34, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

archives

(a thread was deleted in which I was criticized for publishing my unsourced draft of Todd Piro. I'm being more careful here User:Sucker for All/Ashley Strohmier)

Re: Your message: Careful @ 2022 Arkansas gubernatorial election

Notice

You should not delete a [citation needed] with a 2 year old source for an election happening this year. Sucker for All (talk) 16:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully disagree. The section of the article is a candidate list for an election and once a candidate announces they are running, they are a candidate until/if they drop out of the race or lose the primary. Also your facts are incorrect. The source is 18 months old, not 2 years. And the primary election is not until May 2022 which is 15 months away, definitely not this year. Gohogs8722 (talk) 20:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It obviously needs an updated citation. Therefore [citation needed] 's appropriate. Sucker for All (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A lengthy welcome

Hi Sucker for All. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 00:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know that I was 100% right about talk:Sean Conley not being White House Physician anymore. And I will continue to abide by WP:BLP, even when others want to just cite primary sources. My old account actually had more edits than you, so while I believe of course in WP:AGF, when users do Not add posts to the talk page, and do Not cite reliable sources, I plan to continue being a benefit to the wikipedia community. Rather than berate me, even if that was not your intent, let's talk specifics. Help me make the User:Sucker for All/Ashley Strohmier page. I also made the Todd Piro page. If you would like to help make Ashley Strohmier, Hipal, I will assume your edit on my talk page, rather than the specific topic in question (Seema Verma??), was in fact done with the best of intentions. Sucker for All (talk) 21:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]