Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.

File an arbitration request

Guidance on participation and word limits

Unlike many venues on Wikipedia, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.

Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing clerks-llists.wikimedia.org. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
- Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using ~~~~).
Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.

General guidance

This page is for statements, not discussion.
Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, e.g. off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
Declined case requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&oldid=1005826967"

Hidden categories:

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 {{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=43%</noinclude>}}
 <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
-== Editing List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll ==
-'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Danielbr11|Danielbr11]] ([[User talk:Danielbr11|talk]]) '''at''' 02:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
-=== Involved parties ===
-<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator -->
-*{{userlinks|Danielbr11}}, ''filing party''
-*{{userlinks|Nightenbelle}}
-*{{userlinks|Rklahn}}
-*{{userlinks|C.J. Griffin}}
-;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
-<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
-*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nightenbelle#Arbitration_Notification]
-*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rklahn#Administrators_Noticeboard]
-*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:C.J._Griffin#List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll]
-;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
-*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll#Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes
-*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll_discussion
-=== Statement by Danielbr11 ===
-I am trying to edit the article to show 150 million as maximum estimate for Mass killings under communist regimes by providing The following peer reviewed scholarly sources https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C28&q=The+Russian+GULAG+Understanding+the+Dangers+of+Marxism+Combined+With+Totalitarianism&btnG= (https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1350&context=honors) https://www.jstor.org/stable/24563310?seq=1 even a third backup source https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/disaster-red-hundredth-anniversary-russian-socialist-revolution/ Even if necessary this fourth source from harvard says 162 million communism deaths between mao and stalin. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/4/29/predatory-politics-what-was-the-greatest/
-In the policies below it is stated non neutral sources are allowed its simply the editing such as sentence phrasing in the article that must be neutral. The article has both points of view because it has a minimim estimate AND a maximum estimate. My edit is simply a number. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutrality_of_sources https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV_means_neutral_editing,_not_neutral_content In fact look what it says here under achieving neutrality https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view it says "As a general rule, do not remove sourced information from the encyclopedia solely on the grounds that it seems biased." And here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources it says "Wikipedia articles are required to present a neutral point of view. However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject." Again the article shows both point of views as minimum and maximum estimates.
-The three other users have been violating the above policies by deleting my edits simply because they view my sources as biased.
-The volunteer in the dispute resolution noticeboard refused to make a decision to enforce the policies on sources below.[[User:Danielbr11|Danielbr11]] ([[User talk:Danielbr11|talk]]) 02:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
-=== Statement by Nightenbelle ===
-This in no way belongs here. It was suggested they go to the rs notice board or an rfc. Basically this editor is mad that multiple users have told them their sources aren’t reliable and they are looking for any venue that will give them their way. [[User:Nightenbelle|Nightenbelle]] ([[User talk:Nightenbelle|talk]]) 02:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
-=== Statement by Rklahn ===
-Agree with [[User:Nightenbelle|Nightenbelle]]. Arbitration is horrifically premature. A few points in response:
-:*I have not violated any WP policy. I have tried to engage in a conversation about why the the sources are not [[WP:RS|reliable]]. I would go as far as to say the consensus on this point seems to be with me.
-:*The Volunteer in DRN made a decision. [[User:Danielbr11|Danielbr11]] apparently does not like the decision, and has not taken any of the suggested steps in the decision. Instead, we are here.
-:*The sources are, in fact, not reliable and do not support the proposed edit.
-I would summarily decline this case. [[User:Rklahn|Rklahn]] ([[User talk:Rklahn|talk]]) 03:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
-=== Statement by C.J. Griffin ===
-===Statement by Robert McClenon===
-====First observation on List of Death Tolls case====
-The filing party has also opened a thread at [[WP:ANI]],
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Volunteer_fabricating_policies
-The title of the thread is incorrect, but there is no need for a case to be heard here while the conduct dispute (arising from this content dispute) is being handled by the community at [[WP:ANI]].  I may provide an expansion of this statement if it becomes necessary.
-[[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 05:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
-=== Statement by Deepfriedokra ===
-*Recommend decline, of course. OP is running amok in search of a different answer from the one already received. The thread they started on ANI is the venue for this matter.  --<b>[[User:Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:black">Deep</span><span style="color:red">fried</span><span style="color:DarkOrange">okra</span>]] [[User talk:Deepfriedokra|(<span style="color:black">talk</span>)]]</b> 13:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
-=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
-Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
-<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->
-=== Editing List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll: Clerk notes ===
-:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
-*
-=== Editing List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/2/0> ===
-{{anchor|1=Editing List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
-*This doesn't fit under our remit - as the very final point of dispute resolution, for long term disputes that the community cannot handle on its own. I do not believe we're at that point. '''Decline.''' [[User:Worm That Turned|<b style="text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD; color:#000;">''Worm''</b>]]<sup>TT</sup>([[User talk:Worm That Turned|<b style="color:#060;">talk</b>]]) 08:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
-*'''Decline''' per WTT. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 13:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)