User contributions for Wtqf
A user with 171 edits. Account created on 7 December 2019.
13 August 2021
- 15:2915:29, 13 August 2021 diff hist +510 User talk:Wtqf No edit summary
- 13:2713:27, 13 August 2021 diff hist +472 User talk:Wtqf anyone who would attack or block me specifically for improving articles is not here to build an encyclopaedia.
- 10:3610:36, 13 August 2021 diff hist −12 North London derby article is about the rivalry, not the name of the rivalry Tag: Reverted
- 10:3010:30, 13 August 2021 diff hist −23 Stefanie Dolson rm infantile text
- 09:3509:35, 13 August 2021 diff hist −921 Royal Caledonian Curling Club →Curlers' Grace: whatever this is, it is not encyclopaedic
- 09:3509:35, 13 August 2021 diff hist −25 Royal Caledonian Curling Club made lead grammatically correct, neutral and informative
- 09:2809:28, 13 August 2021 diff hist −16 Curling at the 1924 Winter Olympics fixed presentational errors. Nobody should ever be using the word "Brits" in formal writing.
- 09:2509:25, 13 August 2021 diff hist +1 m Talk:Harambe →Comment
- 09:2509:25, 13 August 2021 diff hist +373 Talk:Harambe →Comment
- 09:2209:22, 13 August 2021 diff hist +209 Talk:Harambe →Poll
- 00:4100:41, 13 August 2021 diff hist +448 Talk:Harambe →Comment
12 August 2021
- 23:3523:35, 12 August 2021 diff hist +269 Talk:Harambe →Poll: comment on this RFC totally missing the point
- 23:2323:23, 12 August 2021 diff hist +277 User talk:GreenC/2021 →Your RFC: new section
- 19:0719:07, 12 August 2021 diff hist +250 Talk:Harambe →Poll: another comment
- 19:0619:06, 12 August 2021 diff hist +898 Talk:Harambe →RfC on Dicks out for Harambe: the user missed my point entirely
- 12:3012:30, 12 August 2021 diff hist +323 Talk:Harambe →Dicks out for Harambe
11 August 2021
- 17:3817:38, 11 August 2021 diff hist +132 Talk:Harambe →Dicks out for Harambe
- 16:2316:23, 11 August 2021 diff hist +520 Talk:Harambe →Dicks out for Harambe
- 11:5011:50, 11 August 2021 diff hist −499 Asterism (astronomy) →Notes: no longer referredto
- 11:5011:50, 11 August 2021 diff hist −24 m Asterism (astronomy) →Cross-border asterisms: and more
- 11:4911:49, 11 August 2021 diff hist −98 Asterism (astronomy) →Commonly recognised asterisms: and more. And I find it hard to believe that anyone would think "a bit" could be used in formal English
- 11:4611:46, 11 August 2021 diff hist −311 Asterism (astronomy) →Constellation-based asterisms: rm more incorrect bold face, subjective claims, and some substandard writing
- 11:4111:41, 11 August 2021 diff hist −147 Asterism (astronomy) →Large or bright asterisms: removed incorrect use of bold face and some subjective statements
- 11:3211:32, 11 August 2021 diff hist −387 Asterism (astronomy) rearranged and simplified the lead section. start by defining the topic. later note related concept.
- 11:2711:27, 11 August 2021 diff hist −12 m Big Dipper →Stars: why would someone have put these words in bold face?
- 11:0811:08, 11 August 2021 diff hist −16 Asterism (astronomy) whether they are widely known or not is irrelevant to what they are
- 10:1110:11, 11 August 2021 diff hist −82 Harambe →Popular culture: removed badly-written claim not found in any of the given references
- 10:0710:07, 11 August 2021 diff hist −182 Harambe Undid revision 1038201606 by GreenC (talk) "sourced" is necessary but not sufficient. Like I already said, it would need to be explained for the sentence to be useful. Without any explanation, it just looks like someone wanted to put the word "Dicks" into the article Tag: Undo
- 01:4901:49, 11 August 2021 diff hist −172 Harambe →Internet memes{{anchor|Fall-out_and_Internet_memes}}: the meme would need explaining for this sentence to be useful. As it was, just looked like a teenager trying to get rude words into an article for a laugh
- 01:4401:44, 11 August 2021 diff hist +2 Harambe →Internet memes{{anchor|Fall-out_and_Internet_memes}}: rm NPOV violations
- 01:3701:37, 11 August 2021 diff hist −21 Harambe →Reactions: fixed old vandalism, removed opinion
- 01:3601:36, 11 August 2021 diff hist −11 Harambe State the facts, give the source which verifies them; presenting the words of the source in wikipedia's own voice violates NPOV.
- 01:0701:07, 11 August 2021 diff hist −7 Orangutan →Social life: patronising, unnecesaary
- 01:0701:07, 11 August 2021 diff hist −1 m Orangutan →Diet and feeding
- 01:0601:06, 11 August 2021 diff hist −1 Orangutan →Diet and feeding: simpler just to link to it
- 01:0001:00, 11 August 2021 diff hist +22 1972 Formula One season Correct link
8 August 2021
- 22:1022:10, 8 August 2021 diff hist −1,427 Smeed's law →Empirical failure: a lot of this text was pure nonsense, so badly written as to be incomprehensible
- 20:4820:48, 8 August 2021 diff hist +17 Smeed's law rewrote horrendous opening sentence with its immediate double interruption; removed scare quotes elsewhere
- 16:4216:42, 8 August 2021 diff hist −8 Pheasant Island clarified and removed unnecessary links
- 11:1411:14, 8 August 2021 diff hist −1,632 1972 Formula One season →Season Review: removed tonnes of unencyclopaedic commentary
- 11:1311:13, 8 August 2021 diff hist −15 Styria what possible other sense is there?
- 11:0311:03, 8 August 2021 diff hist −4 Helmut Marko MOS
- 08:3308:33, 8 August 2021 diff hist −212 1970 Mexican Grand Prix applied some basic standards of writing
- 08:2508:25, 8 August 2021 diff hist −248 1971 Formula One season →World Championship Victory Race: and again
- 08:2208:22, 8 August 2021 diff hist −605 1971 Formula One season →Round 11: United States: and more
- 08:1908:19, 8 August 2021 diff hist −221 1971 Formula One season →Round 10: Canada: continuing
- 08:1708:17, 8 August 2021 diff hist −1,563 1971 Formula One season →Round 9: Italy: removed a tonne of commentary
- 07:5607:56, 8 August 2021 diff hist −517 1971 Formula One season →Round 8: Austria: tm yet more commentary
- 07:5107:51, 8 August 2021 diff hist −708 1971 Formula One season →Round 7: Germany: removed yet more badly-written commentary
- 07:4607:46, 8 August 2021 diff hist −466 1971 Formula One season →Round 6: Britain: rm commentary
