User contributions for Vishwajeet103
Appearance
A user with 84 edits. Account created on 27 July 2020.
31 January 2021
- 09:0709:07, 31 January 2021 diff hist +564 User talk:Vishwajeet103 No edit summary
- 06:1806:18, 31 January 2021 diff hist +124 User talk:Vishwajeet103 No edit summary
- 06:1606:16, 31 January 2021 diff hist +129 User talk:Vishwajeet103 No edit summary
- 06:1206:12, 31 January 2021 diff hist +609 User talk:Vishwajeet103 No edit summary
30 January 2021
- 19:5019:50, 30 January 2021 diff hist +351 User talk:Vishwajeet103 No edit summary
- 09:3809:38, 30 January 2021 diff hist −22 User talk:Vishwajeet103 No edit summary
- 09:3809:38, 30 January 2021 diff hist −12 User talk:Vishwajeet103 No edit summary
- 09:3609:36, 30 January 2021 diff hist −232 User talk:Vishwajeet103 No edit summary
- 09:3409:34, 30 January 2021 diff hist +20 User talk:Vishwajeet103 No edit summary
- 09:3309:33, 30 January 2021 diff hist +802 User talk:Vishwajeet103 Please unblock me
28 January 2021
- 08:4308:43, 28 January 2021 diff hist +49 Sarasvati River →Objections: The blog post is self-published. Tag: Reverted
- 08:3908:39, 28 January 2021 diff hist −73 Sarasvati River Ok citation was added. Tag: Manual revert
- 08:3808:38, 28 January 2021 diff hist +73 Sarasvati River Please add citation of the book in reference!!!! Why is remark getting reverted !! Tag: Reverted
- 07:3707:37, 28 January 2021 diff hist +748 User talk:Kautilya3 See Sarasvati River.
- 07:3207:32, 28 January 2021 diff hist +82 Hindutva →Belief in pseudoscience: disputed claim Tag: Reverted
- 07:3107:31, 28 January 2021 diff hist +762 Talk:Hindutva →Research Exists for Cow urine Benefits
27 January 2021
- 22:0022:00, 27 January 2021 diff hist +400 Talk:Hindutva →Research Exists for Cow urine Benefits: new section
- 21:5221:52, 27 January 2021 diff hist +194 Hindutva →Belief in pseudoscience: POV violation Tag: Reverted
- 21:4321:43, 27 January 2021 diff hist +198 Hindutva Introduction looks biased, looks like only criticizing Hindutva. Tag: Reverted
- 21:2721:27, 27 January 2021 diff hist +7 Sarasvati River →Helmand river: Adding year to give information to readers about the relevance of work.
- 21:2621:26, 27 January 2021 diff hist +151 Sarasvati River →Helmand river: Undue weight to one viewpoint. Point of view pushing by using adjectives, "detailed analysis", "concludes". Tag: Reverted
- 21:1921:19, 27 January 2021 diff hist +110 Sarasvati River →Objections: Unreliable source tag. Rajesh Kochhar citation a blog post. Tag: Reverted
- 21:0321:03, 27 January 2021 diff hist +113 Sarasvati River →Objections: unreliable source. source pdf not redirectable, author credential and cited material not verifiable and looks self published.
- 20:5120:51, 27 January 2021 diff hist +334 User talk:Wareon →January 2021: Please see BB Lal's page unorginal research citation to historical revisionism.
25 January 2021
- 21:4321:43, 25 January 2021 diff hist −2 Sarasvati River →Contemporary mythological meaning
- 21:4121:41, 25 January 2021 diff hist −11 Sarasvati River No edit summary
- 21:3821:38, 25 January 2021 diff hist +11 Sarasvati River →Objections
- 21:3521:35, 25 January 2021 diff hist −149 Sarasvati River →Identification with the Indus Valley Civilisation: unsourced material
- 21:3421:34, 25 January 2021 diff hist +14 Sarasvati River →Identification with the Indus Valley Civilisation: citation needed
- 21:3121:31, 25 January 2021 diff hist +74 Sarasvati River Uncited source
- 21:2721:27, 25 January 2021 diff hist +207 Sarasvati River →Identification with the Indus Valley Civilisation: disputed label
- 21:2321:23, 25 January 2021 diff hist −9 Sarasvati River →Objections
- 21:2221:22, 25 January 2021 diff hist +21 Sarasvati River →Objections
- 21:2021:20, 25 January 2021 diff hist −49 Sarasvati River →Helmand river
- 21:1721:17, 25 January 2021 diff hist −11 Sarasvati River →Helmand river: his conclusions are "claims" as they are uncited
- 21:1321:13, 25 January 2021 diff hist +3 Sarasvati River →Revival
- 21:1221:12, 25 January 2021 diff hist +123 Sarasvati River →Revival: Unverified claims of journalists being projected as investigative report of Reuters.
- 21:0321:03, 25 January 2021 diff hist −147 Sarasvati River →Helmand river: Added year of opinion
- 21:0021:00, 25 January 2021 diff hist +154 Sarasvati River →Helmand river: Unreliable sources
- 20:5820:58, 25 January 2021 diff hist −686 Sarasvati River A non scholar view in too much detail. Please keep opinions of historians and reputed scholars and not of uncited bloggers.
- 20:5320:53, 25 January 2021 diff hist +348 Sarasvati River Opinions of non scholars questioned
- 20:4320:43, 25 January 2021 diff hist 0 Sarasvati River →Objections: View of a blogger which was given more importance than an eminent historian placed in bottom
- 20:4120:41, 25 January 2021 diff hist −161 Sarasvati River Uncited and unpublished Views of a non scholar and blogger removed
- 20:3420:34, 25 January 2021 diff hist +90 Sarasvati River clarify an opinion
- 20:2620:26, 25 January 2021 diff hist +113 David Frawley citation needed Tag: Reverted
- 20:1920:19, 25 January 2021 diff hist −162 B. B. Lal How can opinions of politicians and non researchers (lecturers with zero reputation) used to give belitting highly contentious labels to eminent living persons ?
- 19:4219:42, 25 January 2021 diff hist −309 Bharatiya Janata Party Fake citation to Social Conservatism. Also Social conservatism is an ideology for US politics, Conservatism in India is anyway already listed. Tag: Reverted
24 January 2021
- 15:2415:24, 24 January 2021 diff hist −16 Hindutva Equality is very much enshrined in Constitution. It is not only a Hindutva idea. Tag: Reverted
- 15:2115:21, 24 January 2021 diff hist −4 Hindutva No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 15:2015:20, 24 January 2021 diff hist +431 Hindutva Only one perspective was given in introduction. Added a different perspective. Tag: Reverted