User contributions for Tturner2009

10:0810:08, 3 April 2009 diff hist +2,436 Talk:Kim Dotcom →specific complaints?
02:1302:13, 3 April 2009 diff hist +349 Talk:Kim Dotcom →specific complaints?
02:1102:11, 3 April 2009 diff hist +2,498 Kim Dotcom Taking note of the recent editors' comments, I have edited and uploaded a new version of this article with a focus on verifiable facts, 3rd party sources, objective language and a more balanced tone.

05:2605:26, 19 March 2009 diff hist +3,754 Kim Dotcom see the discussion page
05:1605:16, 19 March 2009 diff hist +359 Talk:Kim Dotcom No edit summary
04:4104:41, 19 March 2009 diff hist +3,698 Kim Dotcom Not sure why you are doing this but I have said that references will be added and this article will be improved as well.
03:5703:57, 19 March 2009 diff hist +3,698 Kim Dotcom Please list your specific points. And please note I will be building the sources links as well. Wikipedia guidelines are followed.
00:4500:45, 19 March 2009 diff hist +3,698 Kim Dotcom This is the revised version. I have added the reference list which will be linked to those sources as well.--~~~~

03:5903:59, 10 March 2009 diff hist +300 User talk:Tturner2009 →Edit war in Kim Schmitz
02:2902:29, 10 March 2009 diff hist +6,153 Kim Dotcom Check the discussion page please and (78.34.4.52) talk page.
02:2002:20, 10 March 2009 diff hist +413 User talk:78.34.4.52 No edit summary
01:1901:19, 10 March 2009 diff hist +6,153 Kim Dotcom We can certainly work on the references. Is this the only issue with the article? Instead of removing it, let's add references to this article.
00:4600:46, 10 March 2009 diff hist −1 Talk:Kim Dotcom →can we use this source?
00:4500:45, 10 March 2009 diff hist +454 Talk:Kim Dotcom →can we use this source?
00:4100:41, 10 March 2009 diff hist +6,153 Kim Dotcom This revised version will provide the base for discussion and coming up with a final version. Please check discussion page.

06:3706:37, 3 March 2009 diff hist +519 Talk:Kim Dotcom →Update
06:3006:30, 3 March 2009 diff hist +3,713 Kim Dotcom I would like all editors to kindly read my more balanced, more informative and above all more accurate entry as it pertains to Kim Schmitz. It contains all the facts of the orginal entry.

06:5306:53, 28 February 2009 diff hist +3,741 Kim Dotcom This entry does not eliminate any of the colourful facts or criminal background as this pertain to Kim's past. Please read carefully and you will see this is correct. If not, please let me know.

01:3901:39, 18 February 2009 diff hist +3,741 Kim Dotcom The changes that have been incorporated into this entry are done in order to provide a balanced, accurate and current/updated record of Kim.