User contributions for Topazg

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

23:3423:34, 20 May 2019 diff hist +7 Poker Hall of Fame No edit summary

10:0110:01, 5 March 2010 diff hist +493 Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity →Other Important Papers

13:5213:52, 2 March 2010 diff hist +352 Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity →The Man Who Was Allergic to Radio Waves

13:0013:00, 8 February 2010 diff hist +109 Talk:Wireless electronic devices and health →New Research reported Feb 2010

16:3916:39, 5 February 2010 diff hist +453 Talk:Bioinitiative Report →Origin and credibility of the BI report and its authors
16:3016:30, 5 February 2010 diff hist +735 Talk:Bioinitiative Report →Origin and credibility of the BI report and its authors
16:1616:16, 5 February 2010 diff hist +333 Talk:Bioinitiative Report →Origin and credibility of the BI report and its authors
16:0916:09, 5 February 2010 diff hist +671 Talk:Bioinitiative Report →Origin and credibility of the BI report and its authors
15:5815:58, 5 February 2010 diff hist −5 m Talk:Bioinitiative Report →Origin and credibility of the BI report and its authors
15:5715:57, 5 February 2010 diff hist +17 Talk:Bioinitiative Report →EU Parliament: Clean up by separating spin-off discussion
15:5615:56, 5 February 2010 diff hist +4 m Talk:Bioinitiative Report No edit summary
15:5315:53, 5 February 2010 diff hist +1 m Talk:Bioinitiative Report →EU Parliament
15:4915:49, 5 February 2010 diff hist +805 Talk:Bioinitiative Report →EU Parliament
15:4315:43, 5 February 2010 diff hist +33 Bioinitiative Report Do we need one? I mean, all authors have published in peer reviewed journals, and most are active researchers at their University. Either way, if it's a quote it needs to be cited.
15:0615:06, 5 February 2010 diff hist +951 User talk:Bio201001 →Welcome current
15:0015:00, 5 February 2010 diff hist +207 Talk:Bioinitiative Report →EU Parliament
14:5414:54, 5 February 2010 diff hist −2 Bioinitiative Report I don't see what the quotes contribute, apart from being somewhat confusing as to the point being made.
14:5214:52, 5 February 2010 diff hist +1,812 Talk:Bioinitiative Report →EU Parliament: Clean up, and a few responses

15:3815:38, 1 February 2010 diff hist +3,173 m Bluetooth Undid revision 341260907 by 95.109.249.193 (talk) revert either vandalism or accidental removal of material

09:3609:36, 21 January 2010 diff hist +846 Talk:Wireless device radiation and health →Cell Phone Exposure and Alzheimer’s

11:4011:40, 19 January 2010 diff hist +435 User talk:Topazg →January 2010
11:1211:12, 19 January 2010 diff hist +1,601 Wireless device radiation and health Undid revision 338725755 by 202.67.5.250 (talk) rv van

15:2015:20, 18 January 2010 diff hist +49 m User:Topazg →Interesting articles current
15:1915:19, 18 January 2010 diff hist +95 User:Topazg No edit summary

15:5515:55, 16 January 2010 diff hist +1,646 Talk:Bioinitiative Report →COI template not warranted for reason given
15:5415:54, 16 January 2010 diff hist +1,637 Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity →Repetition of "claimed" in prevalence section
15:3715:37, 16 January 2010 diff hist +123 User talk:Topazg →Welcome back

17:2417:24, 15 January 2010 diff hist +993 Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity →Repetition of "claimed" in prevalence section
16:5316:53, 15 January 2010 diff hist +278 Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity →Repetition of "claimed" in prevalence section
16:4216:42, 15 January 2010 diff hist +1,111 Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity No edit summary
16:3616:36, 15 January 2010 diff hist 0 m User talk:Topazg No edit summary
16:3616:36, 15 January 2010 diff hist −5,378 User talk:Topazg Removing old information
16:3116:31, 15 January 2010 diff hist −16 Electromagnetic hypersensitivity Agreed with other edits, don't agree with these "claims" instances. The lead already indicates the condition is a recognised condition, but with only a "claimed" etiology. Repetition feels redundant?
16:2516:25, 15 January 2010 diff hist +1,452 Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity →Now here's an interesting article
13:3213:32, 15 January 2010 diff hist −327 m Talk:Wi-Fi →Embedded systems
13:3113:31, 15 January 2010 diff hist +91 Talk:Wi-Fi →complete security misunderstanding
12:0412:04, 15 January 2010 diff hist −7 Wireless device radiation and health Undid revision 337981455 by 217.206.109.2 (talk) rv van
10:2310:23, 15 January 2010 diff hist +589 Talk:Non-ionizing radiation →Non-ionizing radiation not mutagenic?
09:3209:32, 15 January 2010 diff hist 0 Electric power transmission →Health concerns: I think there is an important semantic difference between "does suggest no hazard" and "does not suggest hazard", and an IARC 2B classification feels the latter is more apt?
09:2409:24, 15 January 2010 diff hist +3,394 Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity →Now here's an interesting article

13:4913:49, 6 January 2010 diff hist +18 m Talk:Bioinitiative Report Makes sense to add a controversial tag really
13:4713:47, 6 January 2010 diff hist −319 Bioinitiative Report Removed unjustified tag changes, with weak or weasel worded reasoning. The article needs improving, not deleting. See talk.
13:4713:47, 6 January 2010 diff hist +1,986 N Talk:Bioinitiative Report ←Created page with '{{talkheader}} ==Deletion recommendation / general notability== Firstly, I will admit that I am naturally biased against large scale edits made by anonymous IPs w...'