User contributions for Tilapidated
Appearance
A user with 241 edits. Account created on 6 February 2013.
24 February 2013
- 16:1316:13, 24 February 2013 diff hist +945 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 00:4100:41, 24 February 2013 diff hist +498 Talk:Bacardi 151 →Move proposal
23 February 2013
- 23:2423:24, 23 February 2013 diff hist +1 m Bacardi 151 No edit summary
- 23:2423:24, 23 February 2013 diff hist 0 Bacardi 151 a characteristic of all 151 proof liquors
- 23:2223:22, 23 February 2013 diff hist 0 Bacardi 151 the link is to alcoholic proof, which does not mention 'over-proof' - changed so that only proof links.
- 23:2023:20, 23 February 2013 diff hist +5 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 23:2023:20, 23 February 2013 diff hist +214 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 22:3122:31, 23 February 2013 diff hist +3 m Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 22:2722:27, 23 February 2013 diff hist +237 Talk:Bacardi 151 No edit summary
- 22:1722:17, 23 February 2013 diff hist +211 Talk:Bacardi 151 →Move proposal
- 22:1622:16, 23 February 2013 diff hist +411 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 22:1222:12, 23 February 2013 diff hist +292 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 22:0922:09, 23 February 2013 diff hist +1,514 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 19:0519:05, 23 February 2013 diff hist +182 Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) →Request for some eyes on a request for comment
- 19:0219:02, 23 February 2013 diff hist +293 Talk:Bacardi 151 →151 rum proposed content
- 19:0019:00, 23 February 2013 diff hist +89 Talk:Bacardi 151 →151 rum proposed content
- 18:5918:59, 23 February 2013 diff hist +1,577 Talk:Bacardi 151 →Move proposal
- 18:5518:55, 23 February 2013 diff hist +606 Talk:Bacardi 151 →Move proposal
- 17:4417:44, 23 February 2013 diff hist +378 Talk:Bacardi 151 →Cultural references
- 17:4217:42, 23 February 2013 diff hist +69 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 17:4117:41, 23 February 2013 diff hist +346 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 17:3817:38, 23 February 2013 diff hist −1 Talk:Water fluoridation the 216 figure is for studies on all issues, the 26 relate to caries reduction
- 17:3617:36, 23 February 2013 diff hist +2,205 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 03:3603:36, 23 February 2013 diff hist +434 Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) →Request for some eyes on a request for comment: new section
- 03:2803:28, 23 February 2013 diff hist +7 m Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
22 February 2013
- 23:4723:47, 22 February 2013 diff hist +1 m Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 23:4623:46, 22 February 2013 diff hist +205 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 23:4223:42, 22 February 2013 diff hist +666 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 23:2823:28, 22 February 2013 diff hist +779 User talk:Zad68 →Range of findings
- 23:2423:24, 22 February 2013 diff hist +542 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 23:2123:21, 22 February 2013 diff hist +611 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 20:2220:22, 22 February 2013 diff hist +328 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 20:2020:20, 22 February 2013 diff hist +627 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 19:2419:24, 22 February 2013 diff hist +44 m Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 19:2319:23, 22 February 2013 diff hist +354 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should we report on the original author's conclusions?
- 19:1919:19, 22 February 2013 diff hist 0 m Talk:Water fluoridation fix typo
- 19:0519:05, 22 February 2013 diff hist +92 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should be report on the original author's conclusions?
- 19:0319:03, 22 February 2013 diff hist +875 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should be report on the original author's conclusions?
- 18:5918:59, 22 February 2013 diff hist +1,180 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should be report on the original author's conclusions?
- 18:4918:49, 22 February 2013 diff hist +436 User talk:Doc James →Water fluoridation
- 18:4218:42, 22 February 2013 diff hist +45 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should be report on the original author's conclusions?
- 18:4018:40, 22 February 2013 diff hist +1 Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should be report on the original author's conclusions?
- 18:4018:40, 22 February 2013 diff hist +1 m Talk:Water fluoridation →When reporting the results a scientific review, is it appropriate to substitute other researcher's interpretations, or should be report on the original author's conclusions?
- 18:3918:39, 22 February 2013 diff hist +2,576 Talk:Water fluoridation RFC
- 18:3718:37, 22 February 2013 diff hist +226 User talk:Doc James →Water fluoridation
- 18:2918:29, 22 February 2013 diff hist +21 User talk:Doc James →Water fluoridation
- 18:2918:29, 22 February 2013 diff hist +699 User talk:Doc James →Water fluoridation
- 18:0618:06, 22 February 2013 diff hist +144 User talk:Doc James →Water fluoridation
- 18:0118:01, 22 February 2013 diff hist +176 User talk:Doc James No edit summary
- 18:0018:00, 22 February 2013 diff hist +517 Talk:Water fluoridation →STOP