User contributions for TheDefenseProfessor

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

17:4917:49, 14 November 2023 diff hist +1,426‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL ‎ →‎TESCREAL: Reply Tag: Reply
16:1616:16, 14 November 2023 diff hist +2‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TESCREAL ‎ Added bullet to separate from previous comment
09:0909:09, 14 November 2023 diff hist −724‎ LessWrong ‎ →‎Neoreaction: Removed 1st cite to the Riggio review: not clear whether "the movement" is NRx or rationality. If the former, unclear if it means the site literally hosted the "embryonic" discussions, vs something more metaphorical (eg providing a necessary condition for NRx to start)

08:0408:04, 17 October 2023 diff hist +1,659‎ Talk:TESCREAL ‎ →‎Devenot source: new section Tag: New topic
06:3206:32, 17 October 2023 diff hist +1,336‎ Talk:TESCREAL ‎ →‎Tsiolkovsky attribution is problematic: new section Tag: New topic
03:1003:10, 17 October 2023 diff hist +29‎ TESCREAL ‎ The meaning of "anti-TESCREAL" as "people who call things TESCREAL and criticize them" is unclear in the current context. Altered to "this analysis of futurist ideas and people" for now. Will need something more specific if previous sections are significantly changed.
02:4902:49, 17 October 2023 diff hist +1‎ m TESCREAL ‎ Also state(s) should be singular.
02:4702:47, 17 October 2023 diff hist +1‎ m TESCREAL ‎ Characterize(s) should be singular: the subject is "James J Hughes" (1 person) modified by a prepositional phrase.

06:2806:28, 20 January 2023 diff hist −138‎ Nick Bostrom ‎ Undid revision 1134684625 by 73.241.33.100 (talk) The text of the email states "it is deeply unfair that unequal access to education, nutrients, and basic healthcare leads to inequality in social outcomes". While this is not explicitly pinned on legacies of racism and colonialism, the implication is pretty clear and to call this "no mention" is misleading. Tag: Undo

00:0200:02, 17 January 2023 diff hist −303‎ Nick Bostrom ‎ Incorrect or misleading to say his views were not addressed.

07:0207:02, 13 January 2023 diff hist +759‎ Talk:Nick Bostrom ‎ →‎"I hate those bloody niggers": Reply Tag: Reply
05:4105:41, 13 January 2023 diff hist +206‎ Nick Bostrom ‎ Replaced sections of the "Apology for an Old Email" discussion with phrasing that describes the apology (and aspects that one could reasonably call inadequate) in a more neutral fashion. Tags: Undo possible unreferenced addition to BLP
05:2905:29, 13 January 2023 diff hist −206‎ Nick Bostrom ‎ Undid revision 1133318105 by TheDefenseProfessor (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
05:2805:28, 13 January 2023 diff hist +206‎ Nick Bostrom ‎ Edited sections regarding email: 1) In "Apology for an Old Email", discussion of views, "disparities in skills and cognitive capacity" are attributed to "unequal access to education, nutrients, and basic healthcare". This does not seem to be controversial, rather that he says Tags: Reverted possible unreferenced addition to BLP