User contributions for Subtopic Screwup Stained Source

A user with 671 edits. Account created on 23 January 2024.

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

This account is globally locked. See global account details for more information.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 February 2024

  • 00:2300:23, 23 February 2024 diff hist +54 Mark Geragos→‎Notable clients: The pardon was not requested on January 20, 2001. That is when it was granted. The cited source was actually a dead link, but you can see from the archive that Geragos is not mentioned: https://web.archive.org/web/20030206224333/https://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/25/eveningnews/main537972.shtml The new LA Times source does mention Geragos. Tag: Reverted
  • 00:2300:23, 23 February 2024 diff hist +38 PresbyopiaSee the Treatment section. Surgery, eye drops, and visual training are all discussed, with sources. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • 00:2300:23, 23 February 2024 diff hist −81 Wikipedia:Guide to addressing bias"try as you might, you'll never prove the author wrong" doesn't make sense as a shorthand here. "side effect" doesn't seem right, and that whole sentence is unneeded. WP:RSP is among the first things you should check when uncertain about a source, so that should definitely be included. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • 00:2200:22, 23 February 2024 diff hist +597 Wikipedia:Increase your chancesAdding nutshell. Removing first-person voice, which is left over from when this was a userspace essay. Fixing bad grammar and awkward phrasing. Improving recently added section on what to do when the citation may not actually support the claim. Better explaining lead sections, which no longer appear above the table of contents. Tweaking the beginning of "How to suggest the change", since it is noted above that it shouldn't always be taken straight to the article talk page. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • 00:2200:22, 23 February 2024 diff hist −2,073 Wikipedia:Everything you need to knowIt may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • 00:2200:22, 23 February 2024 diff hist −15 Opioid epidemic in the United States→‎History: It was not a rebuttal to the letter itself. The problem was not the letter, but the way it was misrepresented, as explained at Porter and Jick Tag: Reverted
  • 00:2200:22, 23 February 2024 diff hist +156 Addiction Rare in Patients Treated with NarcoticsImproving article structure, so that "Jane" and "January 10" appear in the body. Better explaining how this letter came about and why such misrepresentations might have later occurred. It's unfair to say that the letter itself "suffered" from anything. The number of citations was compared to that of letters from nine different issues, not just that same issue. Replacing partial quotes, to better reflect the whole of what was said. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • 00:2200:22, 23 February 2024 diff hist −593 Charles IngramMoving up trial details so that events are in chronological order. Removing unnecessary and highly subjective phrasing, such as "He was taking brazen risks and playing the game in an unusual manner". Tag: Reverted

22 February 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)