User contributions for Spitzer19
Appearance
Results for Spitzer19 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 232 edits. Account created on 8 February 2008.
19 February 2010
- 17:1517:15, 19 February 2010 diff hist 0 British National Party The BNP were not formed from a previous splinter group, the BNP were a splinter group from the National Front.
10 February 2010
- 19:4119:41, 10 February 2010 diff hist +107 British National Party Added relevant information
9 February 2010
- 19:5619:56, 9 February 2010 diff hist −49 National Democratic Party of Germany The BNP are not members of the European National Front.
- 19:4519:45, 9 February 2010 diff hist −196 National Democratic Party of Germany Removed unreferenced, unsubstantiated assumption.
23 November 2009
- 18:2118:21, 23 November 2009 diff hist +544 National Democratic Party of Germany None of those sources are self-published blogspots. Hence, what I am restoring are SOURCED FACTS
- 17:5717:57, 23 November 2009 diff hist +544 National Democratic Party of Germany YT videos are accepted as sources on many wikipedia articles, stop lying.
- 17:5617:56, 23 November 2009 diff hist −1,305 User talk:Spitzer19 Removed BS
19 November 2009
- 17:0917:09, 19 November 2009 diff hist +544 National Democratic Party of Germany Sourced facts are not OR nonsense.
18 November 2009
- 17:3017:30, 18 November 2009 diff hist +128 British National Party Re-inserted fact that was previously in the text but was inappropriately removed.
- 17:0417:04, 18 November 2009 diff hist +544 National Democratic Party of Germany Reverted vandalism to article and re-inserted SOURCED information.
17 November 2009
- 18:1918:19, 17 November 2009 diff hist +544 National Democratic Party of Germany All those facts are cited with sources and are indeed relevant, so there is no basis for removing them.
16 November 2009
- 17:3217:32, 16 November 2009 diff hist +112 National Democratic Party of Germany The video may be self-published but the source is not used to assert that the NPD are Nazis but merely to convey that some consider them a Nazi movement.
12 November 2009
- 18:1518:15, 12 November 2009 diff hist +112 National Democratic Party of Germany The video is only used to reference the fact that antifa consider the NPD Nazis. The video is NOT being used as a reference to assert that the NPD really are of that persuasion.
11 November 2009
- 18:3018:30, 11 November 2009 diff hist −2,356 Neo-Nazism Reverted unsubstantiated edit. You can read the references for yourself and you`ll see that the term NeoNazism is used ambiguously, this needs to be specified
- 18:2918:29, 11 November 2009 diff hist +112 National Democratic Party of Germany "no they are not". I can provide dozens of Wikipedia articles where videos are used as references so stop lying and not all opponents of Nazism use the prefix "Neo" to describe contemporary Nazis
10 November 2009
- 17:4017:40, 10 November 2009 diff hist −2,356 Neo-Nazism Re-inserted factual introduction. The fact tha NeoNazism is used to describe BOTH of offshoots of Nazism and those who want to re-establish the same Nazism is absolutely ambiguous
- 17:3517:35, 10 November 2009 diff hist +113 British National Party Re-inserted fact
- 17:3217:32, 10 November 2009 diff hist +112 National Democratic Party of Germany "videos are not references". You`re wrong, videos are often used as references on wikipedia.
30 October 2009
- 16:3616:36, 30 October 2009 diff hist +95 National Democratic Party of Germany Added reference
- 16:2916:29, 30 October 2009 diff hist +1 Neo-Nazism No edit summary
- 16:2916:29, 30 October 2009 diff hist +137 Neo-Nazism Clarified the ambigous usage of the term NeoNazism
29 October 2009
- 17:4517:45, 29 October 2009 diff hist +17 National Democratic Party of Germany Not everyone uses the prefix "neo". Antifa for instance uses the term Nazi to identify groups like the NPD
- 17:4317:43, 29 October 2009 diff hist −66 National Democratic Party of Germany Removed unreferenced, uncited assumption
- 17:4017:40, 29 October 2009 diff hist −3 Neo-Nazism No edit summary
- 17:3917:39, 29 October 2009 diff hist +1 Neo-Nazism No edit summary
- 17:3817:38, 29 October 2009 diff hist −221 Neo-Nazism No edit summary
- 17:3617:36, 29 October 2009 diff hist +82 Neo-Nazism No edit summary
- 17:3217:32, 29 October 2009 diff hist +14 Neo-Nazism →Russia
- 17:3217:32, 29 October 2009 diff hist +391 Neo-Nazism The claim that Russian Nazis disdain the electoral system is merely an assumption, and an illogical one when a very prominent one applied to run for election.
26 October 2009
- 18:1818:18, 26 October 2009 diff hist +1 Neo-Nazism →Russia
- 18:1718:17, 26 October 2009 diff hist +13 Neo-Nazism Reverted illogical edit. You cannot assert that Russian nazis boycott politics when a prominent one tried to stand for election but it is logical that they would scorn politics as a consequence
22 October 2009
- 17:1417:14, 22 October 2009 diff hist +422 Neo-Nazism →Russia
7 October 2009
- 17:5817:58, 7 October 2009 diff hist +24 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified
- 17:3517:35, 7 October 2009 diff hist −9 User talk:Spitzer19 No edit summary
- 17:3317:33, 7 October 2009 diff hist +12 British National Party (Correcting my own mistake) Source NO.1 with Renton. Furthermore, I had to revert vandalism to a proven fact again
- 17:2617:26, 7 October 2009 diff hist −34 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified
- 17:2017:20, 7 October 2009 diff hist +13 British National Party "The consensus is against" Source NO.4 with Copsey, he is the most recent reference, and all the arguments provided in the discussion confirm what I have said. Please refrain from ignorance.
- 17:1817:18, 7 October 2009 diff hist +506 User talk:Spitzer19 →BNP edits
- 17:1217:12, 7 October 2009 diff hist +13 British National Party Please refrain from unsubstantiated, unjustified edits maesterTondberry. The Copsey`s analysis(the most recent reference) clearly asserts they are a recalibration of fascism.This needs to be specified
- 17:1017:10, 7 October 2009 diff hist 0 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified
- 17:0917:09, 7 October 2009 diff hist −1 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified
- 17:0817:08, 7 October 2009 diff hist +2,204 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified
- 16:4516:45, 7 October 2009 diff hist +13 British National Party "Disruptive editing removed" nothing disruptive about adding a reliable fact to the article that is found in the references and as I proved in the discussion
- 16:2716:27, 7 October 2009 diff hist +13 British National Party Reference NO. 4 clearly asserts they are a recalibration of fascism. Doesn`t mean they aren`t fascist but the fact that they deviate from orthodox fascism needs to be specified. See discussion
- 16:2416:24, 7 October 2009 diff hist +348 Talk:British National Party →Fascism label
- 16:2116:21, 7 October 2009 diff hist +476 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified
- 16:1816:18, 7 October 2009 diff hist +2,051 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified
6 October 2009
- 17:4617:46, 6 October 2009 diff hist +613 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified
- 17:3517:35, 6 October 2009 diff hist +544 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified
- 17:3217:32, 6 October 2009 diff hist +431 Talk:British National Party →The fascism label needs to be modified