User contributions for Someguywhosbored
A user with 130 edits. Account created on 15 February 2022.
18 June 2024
- 08:4508:45, 18 June 2024 diff hist −865 Tughlaq dynasty →Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq: This source seems completely unavailable online. Per guidelines there should at least be a ISBN number, but the one listed here leads to a completely different book written by John F richards. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
17 June 2024
- 07:0207:02, 17 June 2024 diff hist −431 Mughal Empire Undid revision 1229489111 by Abirtel (talk) I don’t see where it specifically claims that Sanskrit was an official language in the source cited. Tag: Undo
13 June 2024
- 10:5910:59, 13 June 2024 diff hist −9 m Delhi Sultanate Undid revision 1228820493 by Someguywhosbored (talk) hmm actually I don’t think that helps. current Tag: Undo
- 10:5710:57, 13 June 2024 diff hist +9 Delhi Sultanate →Khalji dynasty (1290–1320): Flows better. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:5210:52, 13 June 2024 diff hist −17 Delhi Sultanate →Khalji dynasty (1290–1320): Fixed grammatical error. “Adopted some of Afghan habits and customs” just doesn’t flow well or sound right. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 01:0201:02, 13 June 2024 diff hist −326 Mongol invasion of India (1306) Not really a territorial change. current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
12 June 2024
- 11:2011:20, 12 June 2024 diff hist +5 Mongol invasion of India (1306) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:1311:13, 12 June 2024 diff hist −10 Battle of Amroha Undid revision 1228066841 by Malik-Al-Hind (talk) Not a beneficial change. current Tag: Undo
- 11:0911:09, 12 June 2024 diff hist +10 Mongol invasion of India (1297–1298) Undid revision 1228072987 by Malik-Al-Hind (talk) As per comment on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_India_(1306), this doesn’t benefit the article and thus shouldn’t be changed. current Tag: Undo
- 11:0611:06, 12 June 2024 diff hist +10 Mongol invasion of Sindh Undid revision 1228072922 by Malik-Al-Hind (talk) As per last comment on another page. Be more specific. current Tag: Undo
- 11:0411:04, 12 June 2024 diff hist +10 Mongol invasion of India (1306) Undid revision 1228072834 by Malik-Al-Hind (talk) I only mentioned that because you claimed that “Indian” or “delhi sultanate” would be okay, and the first part is not true. It has nothing to do with the info box. Furthermore, if it doesn’t benefit the article, then what is the point of making the change? Delhi denotes a geographical location. “Delhi sultanate” denotes the actual state that fought. Tag: Undo
9 June 2024
- 08:4908:49, 9 June 2024 diff hist +2 Sayyid dynasty →History: Whoops, accidentally deleted a paragraph break. Fixed that. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:4308:43, 9 June 2024 diff hist −272 Sayyid dynasty →History: Eraly states that the dynasty was of Arab origin, so this would give undue weight to one theory over another. Plus this was written by a sockpuppet(mydust). Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
6 June 2024
- 10:5010:50, 6 June 2024 diff hist +10 Mongol invasion of Sindh No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:4910:49, 6 June 2024 diff hist +10 Mongol invasion of India (1297–1298) To be more specific Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 June 2024
- 04:3104:31, 5 June 2024 diff hist +10 Mongol invasion of India (1306) Again this change doesn’t benefit the article at all. Best to specify “Delhi sultanate”. And yes, contrary to your claim, that’s a huge difference from “Indian”. They were foreign rulers. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 03:0003:00, 5 June 2024 diff hist −6 Mughal dynasty Forgot to remove the religious identification in the lead. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
4 June 2024
- 07:0607:06, 4 June 2024 diff hist −29 Bahmani Sultanate https://www.jstor.org/stable/41880625 There is no page number cited, and I couldn’t spot where this is written in the article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 03:5003:50, 4 June 2024 diff hist +1,133 Delhi Sultanate →Sayyid dynasty (1414–1450): Not sure why this was removed when it remains in the main article. Adding this important line back. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 03:4303:43, 4 June 2024 diff hist −444 Delhi Sultanate →Tughlaq dynasty (1320–1413): Removing old sockpuppet edits(user mydust). Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
3 June 2024
- 04:5104:51, 3 June 2024 diff hist −6 Battle of Kili Undid revision 1226730096 by Malik-Al-Hind (talk) This doesn’t benefit the article at all. current Tag: Undo
- 04:3204:32, 3 June 2024 diff hist −1 List of wars involving India →Early Modern India (c. 16th to mid 19th century CE): Fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
26 May 2024
- 18:4918:49, 26 May 2024 diff hist −130 Bahmani–Vijayanagar War As was already mentioned previously, article was created by a banned user. current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
25 May 2024
- 07:3107:31, 25 May 2024 diff hist −1 Deccan sultanates Fixed typo current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 01:0901:09, 25 May 2024 diff hist +1,098 Talk:Mughal Empire →RfC: Usage of "Indo-Muslim" in lead: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 00:5500:55, 25 May 2024 diff hist +3,637 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
23 May 2024
- 01:0101:01, 23 May 2024 diff hist −7 Mughal Empire Regentspark suggested not listing a religious identification to the empire in the lead. See talk page for an explanation. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
22 May 2024
- 22:2222:22, 22 May 2024 diff hist +170 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 22:0222:02, 22 May 2024 diff hist −948 Mughal dynasty Per talk page agreement in the Mughal empire article. Something this nuanced should not remain the lead. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:5521:55, 22 May 2024 diff hist −931 Mughal Empire Per talk page discussion, everyone concludes that this should no longer remain in the lead. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:4021:40, 22 May 2024 diff hist +5,951 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 19:4019:40, 22 May 2024 diff hist +1,694 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 08:3608:36, 22 May 2024 diff hist −3,680 User talk:Someguywhosbored Hopefully have made amends current Tags: Blanking Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:2408:24, 22 May 2024 diff hist +224 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 08:2308:23, 22 May 2024 diff hist +6,277 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
18 May 2024
- 17:1717:17, 18 May 2024 diff hist +293 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 17:1217:12, 18 May 2024 diff hist +5,406 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 16:0416:04, 18 May 2024 diff hist +995 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 15:5815:58, 18 May 2024 diff hist +846 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 15:4915:49, 18 May 2024 diff hist +385 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 15:4715:47, 18 May 2024 diff hist +812 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 15:3015:30, 18 May 2024 diff hist +4,412 Talk:Mughal Empire →Mughal empire Indo-muslim?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
8 May 2024
- 09:4709:47, 8 May 2024 diff hist +13 Rebellion of Ismail Mukh You’re right to be honest. The term bahmani might be a bad pick. “Ismail Mulk’s rebellion” might fit better here because it’s in line with the articles title. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 05:4205:42, 8 May 2024 diff hist 0 Rebellion of Ismail Mukh Im not sure if there was an official name for this rebellion but this is probably more accurate. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
7 May 2024
- 19:2719:27, 7 May 2024 diff hist −641 Tughlaq dynasty See talk page. Haven’t gotten a response yet but if there are any concerns check there.
6 May 2024
- 00:4400:44, 6 May 2024 diff hist +1,639 Talk:Tughlaq dynasty →Punjabi language: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
3 May 2024
- 20:5620:56, 3 May 2024 diff hist −641 Tughlaq dynasty Undid revision 1222088075 by Malik-Al-Hind (talk) That’s just a definition that you made up. The term “Dynastic” is not mentioned anywhere, nor does it mean what you think it means. The biggest issue however I see, is that non of the sources support the assertion that the tughlaq emperors spoke punjabi. It merely states that one scholar created a war ballad in the language. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 08:1308:13, 3 May 2024 diff hist −641 Tughlaq dynasty What does dynastic mean in this scenario? Furthermore, the existence of a piece of poetry written by one court scholar does not make it a common language. Tag: Reverted
26 April 2024
- 11:1111:11, 26 April 2024 diff hist −484 Khivan campaign of 1839 Undid revision 1219374324 by Dushnilkin (talk) Please provide a page number and the exact quote where it states “Russian political victory”. Also I’m unable to find the source anywhere. Tag: Undo
10 April 2024
- 22:2922:29, 10 April 2024 diff hist −482 Khivan campaign of 1839 This was added to the article with no real explanation. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
