User contributions for Sergeant Cribb
Appearance
A user with 1,109 edits. Account created on 30 April 2011.
5 July 2011
- 06:0706:07, 5 July 2011 diff hist −41 User talk:Sergeant Cribb retired
- 06:0606:06, 5 July 2011 diff hist +528 User:Sergeant Cribb retired current
- 06:0406:04, 5 July 2011 diff hist +671 User talk:LadyofShalott →My request for help: new section
- 06:0306:03, 5 July 2011 diff hist +534 User talk:Sergeant Cribb →Do you make a habit of threatening other editors?: No, of course not
4 July 2011
- 21:4021:40, 4 July 2011 diff hist +146 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: It includes a ''description'' of the SMM.
- 21:3821:38, 4 July 2011 diff hist +515 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Accusations of dishonesty by Malleus Fatuorum: I claim that they are all relevant, all support material in part, some in full, that they are all in good faith and part of the normal editing process.
- 21:2921:29, 4 July 2011 diff hist +240 User talk:Eric Corbett →Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men: ANI-notice
- 21:2921:29, 4 July 2011 diff hist +1,655 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Accusations of dishonesty by Malleus Fatuorum: new section
- 21:1121:11, 4 July 2011 diff hist +421 User talk:Eric Corbett →Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men: I will not accept that.
- 21:0721:07, 4 July 2011 diff hist +152 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: Then who was the "you" addressed, may I ask?
- 21:0521:05, 4 July 2011 diff hist +1,218 User talk:Eric Corbett →Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men: new section
- 20:5820:58, 4 July 2011 diff hist +406 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: Whether or not this criticism is justified, it is a matter of common-or-garden editing and has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not the article should be kept or deleted.
- 20:5420:54, 4 July 2011 diff hist +20 Saddleworth Morris Men added citation
- 20:5120:51, 4 July 2011 diff hist +211 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: If that was addressed to me, then I refer you to my comment above dated 20:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC).
- 20:4820:48, 4 July 2011 diff hist +34 Saddleworth Morris Men added citation
- 20:4420:44, 4 July 2011 diff hist +391 Talk:Medieval Merchant's House →Number 58: new section
- 20:2920:29, 4 July 2011 diff hist +23 N Rhaebus ←Redirected page to Mezentius
- 20:2520:25, 4 July 2011 diff hist +227 Mimas (Aeneid) added reference Fratantuono
- 19:0419:04, 4 July 2011 diff hist −88 Last Mountain rm line with no link to disambiguate to
- 18:4118:41, 4 July 2011 diff hist +178 Saddleworth Morris Men added reference website
- 18:3318:33, 4 July 2011 diff hist +478 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: And if you could find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject for the Saddleworth Plasterer, then he would be presumed notable enough for his own article.
- 17:2617:26, 4 July 2011 diff hist +740 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Manhood (Law & Order): The credits and so forth on a film or TV episode are statements by the person or company distributing it, and so the film is a self-published primary source for those assertions.
- 06:2406:24, 4 July 2011 diff hist +469 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: Please do not put words into my mouth: I am making no such suggestion.
3 July 2011
- 21:4121:41, 3 July 2011 diff hist +223 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: That is your opinion, and no doubt other readers, including the closing admin, will give it the weight it deserves.
- 21:3621:36, 3 July 2011 diff hist +376 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: It does not, and I didn't say that it did.
- 21:3021:30, 3 July 2011 diff hist +65 Saddleworth Morris Men reformat and add citation
- 21:2021:20, 3 July 2011 diff hist +57 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: better
- 21:1921:19, 3 July 2011 diff hist +411 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: Triplex reply
- 20:5620:56, 3 July 2011 diff hist +206 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men '''Keep''' I have added eight references to the article which in my view are sufficient for notability.
- 20:4820:48, 3 July 2011 diff hist −127 m Saddleworth Morris Men fix ref
- 20:4620:46, 3 July 2011 diff hist +417 Saddleworth Morris Men added reference Sunday Times
- 20:4220:42, 3 July 2011 diff hist +305 Saddleworth Morris Men added reference Oldham Advertiser
- 17:3517:35, 3 July 2011 diff hist +257 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: Ah, that's a clearer statement. The initial nomination saying "no indication" I took to refer to the article, rather than to the universe at large.
- 17:2617:26, 3 July 2011 diff hist +210 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funny World & Balloon Boy →Funny World & Balloon Boy: Hmm - take a look at Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, especially WP:HARMLESS.
- 17:2017:20, 3 July 2011 diff hist −156 Hawley Harvey Crippen →Media adaptations: only a mention, hardly worth recording
- 17:1817:18, 3 July 2011 diff hist +1 m Hawley Harvey Crippen →Media adaptations: t
- 17:1717:17, 3 July 2011 diff hist +2 m Hawley Harvey Crippen →Media adaptations: better
- 17:0517:05, 3 July 2011 diff hist +357 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: My point is that when there is prima facie evidence of notability, such as ghits on Books and News, it is necessary to address them
- 17:0117:01, 3 July 2011 diff hist +168 Saddleworth Morris Men added reference Cass
- 16:5016:50, 3 July 2011 diff hist +327 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: it is not actually possible from Gbooks to say what coverage that source might or might not have
- 16:4916:49, 3 July 2011 diff hist +370 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men That is not normally regarded as an argument for deletion -- see WP:NOEFFORT.
- 16:4316:43, 3 July 2011 diff hist +28 Saddleworth Morris Men ce
- 16:4316:43, 3 July 2011 diff hist +256 Saddleworth Morris Men added reference Manchester Evening News
- 16:4016:40, 3 July 2011 diff hist +316 Saddleworth Morris Men added reference Telegraph
- 16:3616:36, 3 July 2011 diff hist +129 Saddleworth Morris Men added reference EDS
- 16:3416:34, 3 July 2011 diff hist +226 Saddleworth Morris Men added reference Scott
- 16:2816:28, 3 July 2011 diff hist +169 Saddleworth Morris Men added reference Bolt
- 16:2616:26, 3 July 2011 diff hist +270 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddleworth Morris Men →Saddleworth Morris Men: '''Comment''' surely the question is whether evidence of notability exists?
- 16:1316:13, 3 July 2011 diff hist +32 Josephine Miles ce
- 16:1116:11, 3 July 2011 diff hist +248 Agape and Eros →References: added Rist