User contributions for Second Quantization
Appearance
A user with 24,876 edits. Account created on 22 May 2006.
6 November 2015
- 09:4309:43, 6 November 2015 diff hist −5 User talk:Second Quantization retiring
- 09:4209:42, 6 November 2015 diff hist −394 User:Second Quantization I'm not sure fixing anything on wikipedia is really worth my time current
- 09:4009:40, 6 November 2015 diff hist +137 User talk:Second Quantization →Mea Culpa: reply
4 November 2015
- 10:3310:33, 4 November 2015 diff hist +19 m Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Proposed text: add
- 10:3210:32, 4 November 2015 diff hist +253 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is Breitbart reliable for its own opinion.: add
- 10:3110:31, 4 November 2015 diff hist +201 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is Breitbart reliable for its own opinion.: reply
- 10:2710:27, 4 November 2015 diff hist +42 A calorie is a calorie Added {{unreliable sources}} tag to article (TW)
- 10:2210:22, 4 November 2015 diff hist +1,572 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Proposed text: reply
- 09:3809:38, 4 November 2015 diff hist +260 User talk:Outedexits →Relativism: new section
- 09:3509:35, 4 November 2015 diff hist +469 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Too much science in Astrology: reply
- 09:2909:29, 4 November 2015 diff hist −12 User talk:McSly →Astrology: logical order
- 09:2909:29, 4 November 2015 diff hist +161 Talk:Astrology →Problems with the third paragraph: add
- 09:2809:28, 4 November 2015 diff hist +206 User talk:McSly →Astrology: add
- 09:2609:26, 4 November 2015 diff hist +222 User talk:McSly →Astrology: reply
- 09:2409:24, 4 November 2015 diff hist +549 Talk:Astrology →pseudoscientific divination: reply
- 09:0909:09, 4 November 2015 diff hist +814 Talk:Astrology →Problems with the third paragraph: reply
- 08:5908:59, 4 November 2015 diff hist −22 Astrology Undid revision 688969714 by Outedexits (talk) No.
- 01:2001:20, 4 November 2015 diff hist +735 Talk:Astrology →pseudoscientific divination: reply
- 01:0001:00, 4 November 2015 diff hist −58 m Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is Breitbart reliable for its own opinion.: extra unnecessary
- 01:0001:00, 4 November 2015 diff hist −5,899 User talk:Second Quantization blank.
- 00:5800:58, 4 November 2015 diff hist +806 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is Breitbart reliable for its own opinion.: new section
- 00:5600:56, 4 November 2015 diff hist +351 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: reply
- 00:5300:53, 4 November 2015 diff hist +12 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Proposed text: Add an RfC to get wider opinions
- 00:5000:50, 4 November 2015 diff hist +358 User talk:Second Quantization →Discretionary Sanctions: don't post on my page
- 00:3900:39, 4 November 2015 diff hist +166 User talk:Second Quantization →Discretionary Sanctions: reply
- 00:3500:35, 4 November 2015 diff hist +945 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: reply
- 00:2000:20, 4 November 2015 diff hist +160 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: add
- 00:1800:18, 4 November 2015 diff hist +475 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: reply
- 00:0600:06, 4 November 2015 diff hist −34 m Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: m
- 00:0500:05, 4 November 2015 diff hist +803 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: reply
3 November 2015
- 23:4923:49, 3 November 2015 diff hist 0 m Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: m
- 23:4923:49, 3 November 2015 diff hist +228 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: reply
- 23:4823:48, 3 November 2015 diff hist +253 User talk:Zero Serenity →Shutting down discussions: reply
- 23:4123:41, 3 November 2015 diff hist +239 User talk:Zero Serenity →Shutting down discussions: new section
- 23:4023:40, 3 November 2015 diff hist +704 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: reply. Remove attempt to shut me down.
- 23:0223:02, 3 November 2015 diff hist +230 Talk:Astrology →pseudoscientific divination: reply
- 22:5522:55, 3 November 2015 diff hist 0 Astrology That's still not the right way around
- 22:5022:50, 3 November 2015 diff hist +1,039 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: reply
- 22:2122:21, 3 November 2015 diff hist −32 m Talk:Astrology →pseudoscientific divination: add
- 22:2122:21, 3 November 2015 diff hist +286 Talk:Astrology →Pseudoscience in first sentence as definition: move down past arbitrary section break
- 22:1222:12, 3 November 2015 diff hist +287 Talk:Astrology →Pseudoscience in first sentence as definition: reply
- 22:0922:09, 3 November 2015 diff hist −31 Astrology OK. How about this?
- 21:5321:53, 3 November 2015 diff hist +269 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: reply
- 21:2621:26, 3 November 2015 diff hist +605 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Censoring any criticism: reply
- 18:5518:55, 3 November 2015 diff hist +635 Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories →Journals: reply
- 18:4018:40, 3 November 2015 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories →RfC: Slight change in first sentence of WP:PROFRINGE: text above is not mine, moving my comment so it doesn't look related
- 18:3918:39, 3 November 2015 diff hist +189 Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories →RfC: Slight change in first sentence of WP:PROFRINGE: new 2
- 18:2918:29, 3 November 2015 diff hist +126 Talk:Astrology →Pseudoscience in first sentence as definition: add.
- 18:1718:17, 3 November 2015 diff hist +119 m Talk:Astrology →Pseudoscience in first sentence as definition: separate
- 18:1618:16, 3 November 2015 diff hist +530 Talk:Astrology →Pseudoscience in first sentence as definition: reply