Jump to content

User contributions for Sciencelover2016

A user with 90 edits. Account created on 20 November 2016.

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

View full log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

27 September 2018

26 September 2018

  • 10:3010:30, 26 September 2018 diff hist −411 V. S. RamachandranNeuroEl - your claim that much of Ramachandran's work is controversial and that he is best known for grand speculations is false, harmful and potentially libellous with possible legal implications. Your editing history (emphasis on portraying the Ramachandran as highly controversial and repeatedly deleting well-sourced references of praise) suggests a conflict of interest, which makes you unfit as a WIKI editor. Someone from the WIKI editorial team ought to step in and assess the situation. Tag: Visual edit

3 September 2018

  • 20:4720:47, 3 September 2018 diff hist +684 V. S. RamachandranAgain your recent edit does not make sense! NeuroEL you have basically deleted the reference that Ramachandran was listed among the "Century Club" one of the most prominent people to watch in the next century; and that he was listed as number 50 in the [[Top 100 Public Intellectuals Poll. If such information is not to be mentioned on a WIKI page then where is it supposed to be mentioned? Why do you keep deleting such important detail from his page?! You are supposed to be neutral!! Tag: Undo
  • 15:1715:17, 3 September 2018 diff hist +573 V. S. RamachandranPlease stop deleting the TIME 100 Magazine reference from Dr Ramachran's WIKI profile! It makes no sense, you have done so several times now, including in the past. How can this be out of date? It is perhaps the most notable aspect of his biography. If you feel that mentioning this is irrelevant please go and also delete this TIME MAGAZINE reference from Steven Pinker and Arrianna Huffington's page, why only this page? Please be objective and neutral in your edits across all subjects on WIKI. Tag: Undo
  • 14:0614:06, 3 September 2018 diff hist +573 V. S. RamachandranNeurEl - I have undone your revision. Please do not remove the TIME magazine 100 most influential people in world listing. It makes absolutely no sense. Why would you remove such an important aspect of his biography? You have done so in the past well. I re-iterate that it is appropriate to highlight such distinctions early on in the bio. This follows the biographical styles of other prominent figures on WIKI! Tag: Undo
  • 05:4205:42, 3 September 2018 diff hist 0 V. S. RamachandranI re-iterate that it is appropriate to highlight such distinctions (especially when selected by Dr Tom Insel director of NIMH for TIME MAGAZINE) early on in the bio. This simply follows the biographical styles of other prominent figures and scientists on WIKI, such as Chomsky, Pinker and Huffington. See their WIKI for detail. It makes no sense to apply a different rule to Ramachandran's page. Tag: Visual edit

2 September 2018

  • 04:1404:14, 2 September 2018 diff hist 0 V. S. RamachandranNeuroEl - what consensus you're referring to? This simply follows the biographical styles of other prominent figures and scientists on WIKI, such as Chomsky, Pinker and Huffington. See their WIKI for detail. It makes no sense to apply a different rule to Ramachandran's page. It is appropriate to highlight such distinctions (especially when selected by Dr Tom Insel director of NIMH for TIME MAGAZINE) early on in the bio. Tag: Visual edit

30 August 2018

  • 21:5621:56, 30 August 2018 diff hist 0 V. S. RamachandranIt is important that this page does not read like an advert. However, consistent with the WiKi pages of Steven Pinker, Chomsky and Arriana Huffington, it is perfectly reasonable to present newspaper listings (e.g., TIME magazine) at the beginning of the page as they are highly representative of the subject in question. Tag: Visual edit

11 February 2018

6 December 2017

  • 15:5415:54, 6 December 2017 diff hist +141 V. S. RamachandranReturning the intro back to an earlier version. The reference to the Time's 100 list, the Newsweek reference, and quotes are important part of his bio and should be mentioned early on consistent with other WIKI BIOs (e.g.Brian Chesky, Arianna Huffington). Tag: Visual edit

2 December 2017

27 November 2017

20 November 2017

31 October 2017

30 October 2017

  • 20:2720:27, 30 October 2017 diff hist −765 V. S. RamachandranThe quote by Simo-Baron Cohen is not relevant here. It is already mentioned on the Tell Tale Brain's wikipedia page. There's a systematic attempt at misrepresenting Ramachandran's work as controversial. This is simply not the case. Tag: Visual edit

2 September 2017

  • 19:3519:35, 2 September 2017 diff hist +160 V. S. RamachandranNeurel please kindly do not keep removing the Newsweek reference. It is a significant media reference. You also extrapolate/infer why he was called Marco Polo or Paul Broca; and why he has received media attention. Kindly please stick to factual material. Tag: Visual edit

26 August 2017

  • 20:5120:51, 26 August 2017 diff hist −740 V. S. RamachandranNeuroel although the quote and subsequent rebuttal is accurate. The quote specifically relates to a pop-psychology book and is not relevant to Ramachandran's scientific career. I have deleted this section as I can't find a suitable place to put it. Tag: Visual edit

25 August 2017

  • 21:2321:23, 25 August 2017 diff hist +1 V. S. RamachandranThank you for the suggestion. But these quotes are important in highlighting VS Ramachandran's public persona - so should be mentioned early on. This is wiki's standards. Please see the WIKI page of other public figures. Tag: Visual edit
  • 10:5710:57, 25 August 2017 diff hist +646 V. S. RamachandranNeuroel kindly refrain from removing (undoing) Ramachandran's "Time 100 list" reference as well as the "Newsweek" reference. Consistent with other wiki BIOs, such lists are important and should be mentioned in their bios per WIKI's standards Tag: Visual edit

24 August 2017

  • 18:3718:37, 24 August 2017 diff hist +659 V. S. RamachandranThis is the second time Ramachandran's appearance on TIME Magazine's 100 list is curiously removed. These noteworthy lists are crucial aspects of Ramachandran's public profile - and should appear in the bio - just like other public figures' bios on Wiki. Tag: Visual edit

20 August 2017

8 August 2017

7 July 2017

  • 15:2315:23, 7 July 2017 diff hist +75 V. S. RamachandranI think it is quite relevant to note what Newsweek's "Century Club" entails; i.e., the “hundred most prominent people to watch in the next century". Many have no idea what the "Century Club" is on it own, so the full details are obviously crucial. Tag: Visual edit

28 June 2017

  • 14:0314:03, 28 June 2017 diff hist +634 V. S. RamachandranThe reference to Ramachandran being on Time's 100 list was surprisingly removed as well as the Newsweek reference. Consistent with other wiki BIOs (Brian Chesky, Arianna Huffington), such lists are important and should be mentioned early on in their bio Tag: Visual edit

3 June 2017

2 June 2017

1 June 2017

  • 19:5419:54, 1 June 2017 diff hist +1,628 V. S. RamachandranI was surprised that nowhere on this page is there mention of Ramachandran being listed in Time magazine's 100 list. Basic information has been updated. Similar to other prominent figures (Steven Pinker, Chomsky) important information is listed early on. Tag: Visual edit

30 May 2017

29 May 2017

28 May 2017

27 May 2017

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)