User contributions for Sasha419

25 March 2009

• 01:3201:32, 25 March 2009 diff hist −59‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Delete Urist, Folk, and Calhoun -- not "notable" -- no lasting contributions comprable to others on this list. By Ped1's loose criteria, the list would exponentially expand and be meaningless.~~~~

22 March 2009

• 21:4521:45, 22 March 2009 diff hist +5‎ User talk:Sasha419 ‎No edit summary current
• 21:4221:42, 22 March 2009 diff hist +2,064‎ User talk:Sasha419 ‎No edit summary
• 00:3700:37, 22 March 2009 diff hist +4‎ User talk:Sasha419 ‎No edit summary
• 00:3600:36, 22 March 2009 diff hist −60‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Delete Urist, Folk and Calhoun.
• 00:3400:34, 22 March 2009 diff hist +1,043‎ User talk:Sasha419 ‎No edit summary

21 March 2009

• 18:4818:48, 21 March 2009 diff hist −60‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ What contributions make Urist, Folk, and Calhoun "notable" ? To PedEye1 -- Silly, childish, personal attacks on me do not advance your argument.

13 March 2009

• 18:2518:25, 13 March 2009 diff hist −60‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Urist, Folk, and Calhoun deleted. Why are they "notable"? Wikipedia should not be a personal popularity contest.

16 March 2008

• 15:1115:11, 16 March 2008 diff hist −62‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Delete Urist, Folk, and Calhoun --- do not fit description of "notable".

15 March 2008

• 15:1715:17, 15 March 2008 diff hist +110‎ Talk:Pediatric ophthalmology ‎No edit summary
• 15:1315:13, 15 March 2008 diff hist −61‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Delete Urist, Folk, Calhoun --- No notable contributions, especially compared to others on list. Many, many others, more worthy, have criteria previously cited by PedEye1.

13 March 2008

• 02:0002:00, 13 March 2008 diff hist −60‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Delete Urist, Folk, Calhoun ---- no significant or lasting contributions.

11 March 2008

• 18:5518:55, 11 March 2008 diff hist −61‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Delete Urist, Folk, Calhoun

15 February 2008

• 04:3504:35, 15 February 2008 diff hist −60‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Why do you insist on listing Urist, Folk, Calhoun? Neither they nor their contributions are notable. For what reason did you add them to the list?

14 February 2008

• 02:0502:05, 14 February 2008 diff hist −60‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎No edit summary

8 February 2008

• 02:1302:13, 8 February 2008 diff hist −60‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Delete Urist, Folk, Calhoun -- No significant or lasting contributions. Please either justify re-inserting, or stop doing so for personal reasons.

25 January 2008

• 22:2122:21, 25 January 2008 diff hist −62‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Delete Urist, Folk, Calhoun. No significant or lasting contributions. Wikipedia is not a popularity contest.

23 December 2007

• 21:0321:03, 23 December 2007 diff hist −60‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Deleted Martin Urist, Eugene Folk, Joseph Calhoun from "notable pediatric ophthalmologists". Not founders of the field, but rather their contemporaries. Wikipedia should not be a popularity contest.

16 December 2007

• 18:5218:52, 16 December 2007 diff hist −60‎ Pediatric ophthalmology ‎ Removed: Martin Urist, Eugene Folk, Joseph Calhoun as "notable pediatric ophthalmologists." -- local, minor figures, most likely included by former fellows.

30 November 2006

• 16:5816:58, 30 November 2006 diff hist +870‎ Marshall M. Parks ‎ Legacy - examples of well-known fellows in leadership positions

29 November 2006

• 03:4703:47, 29 November 2006 diff hist +864‎ Marshall M. Parks ‎ Restored previously deleted list of fellow under "Legacy" --- needed for clarification.