User contributions for SallyScot
A user with 1,965 edits. Account created on 3 May 2006.
17 October 2010
- 11:5311:53, 17 October 2010 diff hist +1,825 Arguments for and against drug prohibition Add Political reasons as a main section heading, move Political calculation as subsection, add new subsection re Sending out messages
16 October 2010
- 16:5016:50, 16 October 2010 diff hist −8 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments that cannabis is a gateway drug: neutralise
- 16:4816:48, 16 October 2010 diff hist −76 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments that prohibition discourages drug use: remove redundant part dealt with in attributed quote that follows
- 16:3916:39, 16 October 2010 diff hist −2,873 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments that prohibitive drug laws are effective: remove misc stats - replace with an attributable claim that pertains to the section heading
- 11:2111:21, 16 October 2010 diff hist −474 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments that prohibitive drug laws are effective: remove reference to TEMO poll - it's been added a few times before, but at no stage has its dead link ever been live
- 11:1511:15, 16 October 2010 diff hist −390 Arguments for and against drug prohibition include further attribution - as per discussion
- 11:1311:13, 16 October 2010 diff hist +17 m Talk:Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Addition of Arguments and Re-structuring of Prohibition Side of Article: add subsection heading for ease of reference
19 September 2010
- 19:4219:42, 19 September 2010 diff hist +1,377 Talk:Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Addition of Arguments and Re-structuring of Prohibition Side of Article: on framing the argument
- 19:4119:41, 19 September 2010 diff hist +557 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments that prohibitive drug laws are effective: part revert previous edit - see my corresponding discussion post
10 September 2010
- 17:2417:24, 10 September 2010 diff hist +382 m Salvia divinorum →References: add Seeman ref
- 17:2217:22, 10 September 2010 diff hist −684 m Salvia divinorum convert Seeman ref to WP:CITESHORT
- 17:2117:21, 10 September 2010 diff hist +382 m Salvia divinorum →References: add Seeman 2009 ref
- 17:0017:00, 10 September 2010 diff hist −159 m Salvia divinorum →News references - US: fix dead links
6 September 2010
- 18:4818:48, 6 September 2010 diff hist +589 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments that prohibitive drug laws are effective: restore attribution of viewpoint as per discussion
- 18:4818:48, 6 September 2010 diff hist +1,114 Talk:Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Addition of Arguments and Re-structuring of Prohibition Side of Article
- 11:1211:12, 6 September 2010 diff hist −760 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments that prohibition discourages drug use: remove OR speculation
- 11:0611:06, 6 September 2010 diff hist +1,894 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Deterrence: restore subsection Arguments that prohibition does not discourage drug use
5 September 2010
- 17:2417:24, 5 September 2010 diff hist +1,278 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments that prohibitive drug laws are ineffective: add support from Sir Ian Gilmore, former president of the Royal College of Physicians and Nicholas Green, chairman of the Bar Council
- 15:4515:45, 5 September 2010 diff hist +188 Arguments for and against drug prohibition Further interleaving of arguments for and against - no change of content, but reordering sections makes for smaller blocks of argument on each side , gives better overall contrast
4 September 2010
- 12:2112:21, 4 September 2010 diff hist +1,276 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments that prohibitive drug laws are ineffective: refer to Stephen Rolles article in British Medical Journal
- 12:0312:03, 4 September 2010 diff hist +606 Talk:Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Interleaving the arguments: I've reworded some of the arguments for drug law enforcement headings to indicate that they are particularly supportive of prohibitive drug law enforcement
- 12:0112:01, 4 September 2010 diff hist +14 Arguments for and against drug prohibition reword arguments for drug law headings to indicate they are particularly supportive of prohibitive drug law enforcement - Talk:Arguments_for_and_against_drug_prohibition#Interleaving_the_arguments xxx
31 August 2010
- 20:5620:56, 31 August 2010 diff hist +671 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Health arguments for drug law reform: add Health benefits subsection
- 20:2920:29, 31 August 2010 diff hist +396 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Health arguments for drug law reform - Gateway drugs: further edit to include BBC news ref
- 20:2220:22, 31 August 2010 diff hist +1,137 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Health arguments for drug law reform: add referenced counterpoint with respect to Gateway drugs subsection of Health arguments for drug law enforcement
30 August 2010
- 20:2820:28, 30 August 2010 diff hist +5 Arguments for and against drug prohibition Undid anon. revision by 99.233.184.83 (talk) - refute this in 'Health arguments for drug law reform' section with inclusion of refs
8 August 2010
- 17:1117:11, 8 August 2010 diff hist +258 Talk:Arguments for and against drug prohibition →The Netherlands: article edited to address this
- 17:1017:10, 8 August 2010 diff hist +709 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Efficacy: edit in response to discussion point
- 11:0511:05, 8 August 2010 diff hist +470 Talk:Legal status of Salvia divinorum →Salvia Argument Overlooked in Main Article: talk page post should essentially be a transcript
7 August 2010
- 19:4019:40, 7 August 2010 diff hist −904 Arguments for and against drug prohibition Undid anonymous edit - too much soapboxing, and anyway, in the wrong section
2 August 2010
- 20:0620:06, 2 August 2010 diff hist −762 Arguments for and against drug prohibition Undid anonymous revision by 75.179.176.190 (talk) - uncited, and anyway didn't make much sense
- 19:5919:59, 2 August 2010 diff hist +3,196 User talk:Sreejithk2000 →File permission problem with File:Salvia Painting MPM.JPG
- 19:5919:59, 2 August 2010 diff hist +775 User talk:SallyScot →File permission problem with File:Salvia Painting MPM.JPG: reply
13 June 2010
- 11:2211:22, 13 June 2010 diff hist +5 m Talk:Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Interleaving the arguments: typo
- 11:2011:20, 13 June 2010 diff hist +667 Talk:Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Interleaving the arguments: made initial attempt at doing this
- 11:1711:17, 13 June 2010 diff hist +475 Arguments for and against drug prohibition Interleave the arguments as proposed in discussion
12 June 2010
- 23:0623:06, 12 June 2010 diff hist +618 Talk:Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Reversion of historical order of this article: propose interleaving the arguments
6 June 2010
- 21:0221:02, 6 June 2010 diff hist +665 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Quality control: remove opening unreferenced sentence and replace it with a referenced one
- 20:4020:40, 6 June 2010 diff hist +43 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Medical Uses of Illicit Drugs: reword with respect to reference
- 19:1319:13, 6 June 2010 diff hist +37 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Medical Uses of Illicit Drugs: reword to better qualify reference
- 18:4418:44, 6 June 2010 diff hist +12 m Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Prohibition does not work: indent to clarify these are arguments of New York County Lawyers' Association
- 18:3718:37, 6 June 2010 diff hist −800 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Prohibition does not work: as with earlier Prohibition works section, coincident statistics subject to interpretation, hence original research without sources that explicitly make such arguments
- 18:3218:32, 6 June 2010 diff hist 0 m Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Freedom (from the consequences of drugs): swap paragraph order as 'Moderaterna' quote give better introductory context
- 18:2818:28, 6 June 2010 diff hist −1,926 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Freedom (from the consequences of drugs): remove POV/OR parts
- 18:1418:14, 6 June 2010 diff hist +224 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Crime, terrorism and social order: reword to better qualify reference
- 16:0516:05, 6 June 2010 diff hist −119 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Health: remove unnecessary POV
- 16:0216:02, 6 June 2010 diff hist −2,464 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Prohibition works: remove opening paragraphs, coincident statistics subject to interpretation, hence original research without sources that explicitly make such arguments
- 14:4314:43, 6 June 2010 diff hist 0 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Arguments for prohibition and against legalization/decriminalization: move Gil Kerlikowske argument from Prohibition works subsection to Economics subsection
- 14:3814:38, 6 June 2010 diff hist −914 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Freedom (from the consequences of drugs): remove "Libertarians argue that only drug dealers should be fought and not the drug users themselves" characterisation and other OR/POV parts
- 14:2914:29, 6 June 2010 diff hist −1,181 Arguments for and against drug prohibition →Prohibition works: remove part from "The proposal that countries must capitulate to the ‘overwhelming flood of illicit drug use’" - next para on Sweden's "successful drug policy" has more NPOV
