User contributions for RichFarmer
Results for RichFarmer talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 42 edits. Account created on 8 January 2006.
19 March 2006
- 18:1018:10, 19 March 2006 diff hist −7,604 Steven Levitt No edit summary
- 18:0818:08, 19 March 2006 diff hist +530 Talk:Steven Levitt →abortion effect
- 06:5006:50, 19 March 2006 diff hist −7,617 Steven Levitt Befpre eliminating this discussion discuss on discussion page. I have discussed this, but you all are changing what is up on the page without responding to the discussion.
- 02:5402:54, 19 March 2006 diff hist −7,617 Steven Levitt Respond to discussion on discussion page.
- 02:5302:53, 19 March 2006 diff hist +210 Talk:Steven Levitt →abortion effect
- 00:2100:21, 19 March 2006 diff hist −7,617 Steven Levitt See talk page. Why remove discussion of Levitt's errors as discussed by fed of Boston or in AER?
- 00:1900:19, 19 March 2006 diff hist +726 Talk:Steven Levitt →abortion effect
18 March 2006
- 19:1019:10, 18 March 2006 diff hist −7,617 Steven Levitt See "discussion" section. Replace with correct discussion.
- 18:0018:00, 18 March 2006 diff hist +1,762 Talk:Steven Levitt →abortion effect
- 08:3608:36, 18 March 2006 diff hist −7,617 Steven Levitt Revert to previous post. You can not cut out all discussion about the fact that Levitt's empirical work frequently contains mistakes. This is also not only a list of his papers.
17 March 2006
- 07:4207:42, 17 March 2006 diff hist −60 Steven Levitt No edit summary
- 06:2106:21, 17 March 2006 diff hist −7,698 Steven Levitt We have already discussed the critiques on the talk page. There was already a lot of compromises long ago.
11 March 2006
- 23:5123:51, 11 March 2006 diff hist +13 m Legalized abortion and crime effect →Criticisms: minor English correction
- 23:4923:49, 11 March 2006 diff hist +1 Legalized abortion and crime effect →Donohue and Levitt's study: Correct order of names. Previous post had the names at the beginning of this secion listed in the wrong order.
- 08:0608:06, 11 March 2006 diff hist −873 Legalized abortion and crime effect →Levitt and Donohue's study: Long quotes not Wikipedia style.
- 06:1206:12, 11 March 2006 diff hist −6,004 Steven Levitt Revert to previous version. Anonymous poster this is largely a postive post, and you can not eliminate you can not eliminate absolutely all criticism. Levitt has made errors,and they should be noted
8 March 2006
- 20:4920:49, 8 March 2006 diff hist −54 Legalized abortion and crime effect →Other Research that Supports the Legalized Abortion and Crime Effect
- 20:4820:48, 8 March 2006 diff hist +93 Legalized abortion and crime effect →External links
- 20:4620:46, 8 March 2006 diff hist +57 m Legalized abortion and crime effect →External links: Minor Expansion on Joyce's two papers
- 20:4420:44, 8 March 2006 diff hist −5 m Legalized abortion and crime effect Rearrange order of papers at end of article. Links to Joyce's work would be nice if someone has them.
- 20:3520:35, 8 March 2006 diff hist +116 Legalized abortion and crime effect →Donohue and Levitt's Rebuttals
- 05:1005:10, 8 March 2006 diff hist +802 Legalized abortion and crime effect →Criticisms
7 March 2006
- 03:0503:05, 7 March 2006 diff hist −5,978 Steven Levitt Revert. Anonymous poster did not keep the critiques as he claimed. The piece is quite positve going through all of his awards and only at the end mentioning that he has run into serious questions.
5 March 2006
- 05:2505:25, 5 March 2006 diff hist +267 m Steven Levitt →Career: Writing things more clearly.
4 March 2006
- 15:5915:59, 4 March 2006 diff hist −6,564 Steven Levitt Can't cut out references to The Economist and other sources that are critical of Levitt. This is a page about Levitt, and it is not solely a positive PR piece.
3 February 2006
- 08:2008:20, 3 February 2006 diff hist −672 Legalized abortion and crime effect Rebuttal section changed despite claims of just improving English. No explanation offered for radical changes.
25 January 2006
- 02:5102:51, 25 January 2006 diff hist −674 Legalized abortion and crime effect Explanation needed for changes. Foote and Goetz were just doing what Donohue and Levitt claimed that they were doing. Why is it now necessary to change the data set?
17 January 2006
- 04:0804:08, 17 January 2006 diff hist +204 Legalized abortion and crime effect →Foote and Goetz
- 04:0604:06, 17 January 2006 diff hist +101 Legalized abortion and crime effect →Foote and Goetz
15 January 2006
- 04:3804:38, 15 January 2006 diff hist +524 Legalized abortion and crime effect →Foote and Goetz
- 04:3604:36, 15 January 2006 diff hist −208 m Legalized abortion and crime effect →Levitt's Rebuttal
14 January 2006
- 16:1316:13, 14 January 2006 diff hist −23 Steven Levitt Acceptable compromise, minor changes ("working papers" and "not published" redundant)
- 06:5506:55, 14 January 2006 diff hist +1,523 Steven Levitt No edit summary
- 06:5406:54, 14 January 2006 diff hist +773 Talk:Steven Levitt →abortion effect
- 04:5004:50, 14 January 2006 diff hist +1,523 Steven Levitt See Talk page
- 04:4804:48, 14 January 2006 diff hist +866 Talk:Steven Levitt →abortion effect
13 January 2006
- 07:0407:04, 13 January 2006 diff hist +143 Legalized abortion and crime effect →External links
- 07:0107:01, 13 January 2006 diff hist −19 Legalized abortion and crime effect No edit summary
- 06:4106:41, 13 January 2006 diff hist +1,691 Steven Levitt Revert to Ziocon5. Issues of accuracy are not just relevant to the Abortion and crime debate, they are relevant to what what thinks of Levitt as a person. He has made these claims for years
8 January 2006
- 22:2122:21, 8 January 2006 diff hist −78 Legalized abortion and crime effect →Foote and Goetz: Providing link to Economist article and quoting the article's conclusion.
- 22:1322:13, 8 January 2006 diff hist +1 m Steven Levitt minor edit
- 22:1122:11, 8 January 2006 diff hist +1,427 Steven Levitt Adding discussion from the Economist Magazine
