User contributions for Proofreader77

21 February 2010

• 00:5200:52, 21 February 2010 diff hist +867 User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): Formatting my own section for replies (note: Ks0stm explicitly said to arrange comment where desired, Gwen Gale objects. Leaving in place.
• 00:3400:34, 21 February 2010 diff hist +73 User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): (Housekeeping) +topic for Questions/comments for Proofreader77 re current status + formatting/arrangement

20 February 2010

• 23:5923:59, 20 February 2010 diff hist +7 m User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): +underline: "the initial 3 blocks"
• 23:5823:58, 20 February 2010 diff hist +6 m User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): + bold one word ("not"
• 23:5723:57, 20 February 2010 diff hist +282 m User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): +Links to Proofreader77's RfAR statement+addendums which prompted the 2nd indefinite block
• 23:5323:53, 20 February 2010 diff hist +1 m User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): + close paren
• 23:4423:44, 20 February 2010 diff hist +162 m User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): +Link to arbiters comments
• 23:3423:34, 20 February 2010 diff hist +1 m User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): + comma
• 23:2823:28, 20 February 2010 diff hist +68 m User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): Clarify "Note 3"
• 23:1223:12, 20 February 2010 diff hist +142 m User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): Complete one Note.
• 23:0923:09, 20 February 2010 diff hist +1 m User talk:Proofreader77 →(Status) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community): (correct word
• 23:0723:07, 20 February 2010 diff hist +1,842 User talk:Proofreader77 →Block status: (Status update) ArbCom declines case re 1st indef ... without ruling on 2nd indef (i.e., back to community) [But let us ponder a breather to consider all that's happened. See block log.
• 18:1418:14, 20 February 2010 diff hist +51 User talk:Proofreader77 +add PDF link to image -- File:NOT poems BUT rhetorical verse.jpg|195px|link=http://www.boke.com/PDF/WhySpeakInSonnets.pdf

19 February 2010

• 20:3120:31, 19 February 2010 diff hist +2,898 User talk:Proofreader77 →Block status: Since my block log has gotten rather complex in the past few days ... adding template {{userlinks|Proofreader77}} at top of topic... ALSO: Collapsed organization of all blocks by number/letter ... Plus comment on "muddled" status
• 00:5900:59, 19 February 2010 diff hist +2,546 User talk:Proofreader77 (Process design concept) WP:DR proposal: RfQ (Request for Questions) - Note: If you have a brief comment of opinion regarding this idea, please feel free to add a "#" in the left column etc + Block status - still waiting for response from ArbCom .
• 00:0800:08, 19 February 2010 diff hist +67 User talk:Proofreader77 header design) + File:NOT poems BUT rhetorical verse (over {{cent}} "Centralized discussion" // (Watchlist aside: RfA soxbot broken still?

18 February 2010

• 02:4002:40, 18 February 2010 diff hist +206 User talk:Proofreader77 →Status: Reply re question from Rodhullandemu " is there any reason why you should be allowed to edit this page ..." Reply: So when there are intermediate status changes, they can be reported here.
• 02:2602:26, 18 February 2010 diff hist +306 User talk:Proofreader77 →Blocked again: Status * I requested information regarding unblocking from the ArbCom email list soon after the new block. I assume the message was forwarded by the moderator to the Committee.
• 02:1502:15, 18 February 2010 diff hist +243 User talk:Proofreader77 →Blocked again: Question for Equazcion 1. How often have you interacted with Rodhullandemu in the past — especially in the past month?
• 01:5601:56, 18 February 2010 diff hist +2,578 User talk:Proofreader77 →Blocked again: Re: Rodhullandemu's comment re "bribe" -- Donations and blocks (timing) - 3 Donations: 12/23/09 - 01/02/10 // First BLOCK 12/29/09 re "A STORY OF CREATIVE GIVING"
• 01:2701:27, 18 February 2010 diff hist +576 User talk:Proofreader77 →Blocked again: Re: Rodhullandemu's comment re financial donations -- See: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Benefactors#Sustaining_donors_.28.241.2C000_to_.244.2C999.29

17 February 2010

• 07:4207:42, 17 February 2010 diff hist +291 User talk:Proofreader77 →Blocked again: Notes
• 07:1607:16, 17 February 2010 diff hist +223 User talk:Equazcion →Mention at ArbCom RfAR (appears dead case, but fyi)
• 07:1107:11, 17 February 2010 diff hist +773 User talk:Equazcion →Mention at ArbCom RfAR (appears dead case, but fyi): new section
• 06:5406:54, 17 February 2010 diff hist +6,396 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case →(Preliminary) statement by Proofreader77: +collapsed (Posting this as collapsed subtopic at AN after improper warning triggered block #4a) Addendum documentation for ArbCom regarding recent Administrator user page message [Template deceased]
• 06:3006:30, 17 February 2010 diff hist +2,418 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case →(Preliminary) statement by Proofreader77: + collapsed table/list data - Donations and blocks (timing
• 04:3104:31, 17 February 2010 diff hist −272 User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite Revert this for now,.. I'll ask at the Arb Clerk's noticeboard first. Undid revision 344541885 by Proofreader77 (talk)
• 04:3004:30, 17 February 2010 diff hist +385 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks →Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Proofreader77_blocks: new section
• 03:0403:04, 17 February 2010 diff hist +272 User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite →Proofreader77 blocks RfAR (re asking clerks?): new section
• 00:5100:51, 17 February 2010 diff hist +4 m Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case →(Preliminary) statement by Proofreader77: corrections
• 00:5000:50, 17 February 2010 diff hist +18,712 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case Preliminary) statement by (now unblocked) Proofreader77 -- Note to clerks: I am not familiar with protocol here -- if this form of response is inappropriate, of course, please revert/move/etc with my apologies

16 February 2010

• 19:1619:16, 16 February 2010 diff hist +16 User talk:Proofreader77 +wikilink
• 09:4609:46, 16 February 2010 diff hist −1 m User talk:Proofreader77 typo
• 09:3909:39, 16 February 2010 diff hist 0 m User talk:Proofreader77 correct link
• 09:3309:33, 16 February 2010 diff hist 0 m User talk:Proofreader77 typo
• 09:3009:30, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1 m User talk:Proofreader77 format
• 09:2809:28, 16 February 2010 diff hist 0 m User talk:Proofreader77 typo
• 09:2409:24, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,465 User talk:Proofreader77 formatting test
• 09:0509:05, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,420 User talk:Proofreader77 formatting test
• 08:5008:50, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,464 User talk:Proofreader77 formatting test
• 08:2908:29, 16 February 2010 diff hist 0 User talk:Proofreader77 formatting test
• 08:2608:26, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,447 User talk:Proofreader77 format test
• 07:5807:58, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,483 User talk:Proofreader77 formatting test
• 07:3107:31, 16 February 2010 diff hist +2 User talk:Proofreader77 formatting test
• 07:3007:30, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,536 User talk:Proofreader77 format test
• 07:1607:16, 16 February 2010 diff hist 0 User talk:Proofreader77 format test
• 07:0607:06, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,924 User talk:Proofreader77 format test
• 06:2906:29, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,471 User talk:Proofreader77 format test
• 06:1306:13, 16 February 2010 diff hist +4,547 User talk:Proofreader77 formatting test
• 01:3001:30, 16 February 2010 diff hist +143 User talk:Proofreader77 + link