User contributions for PraiseTheShroom

13 May 2017

• 17:0317:03, 13 May 2017 diff hist +1,537 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Propose topic ban
• 04:2104:21, 13 May 2017 diff hist +150 User talk:PraiseTheShroom →Reading Recommendation
• 04:1804:18, 13 May 2017 diff hist +416 User talk:PraiseTheShroom →Reading Recommendation
• 04:1004:10, 13 May 2017 diff hist +232 User talk:PraiseTheShroom →Reading Recommendation
• 04:0704:07, 13 May 2017 diff hist +1,656 User talk:PraiseTheShroom →Topic ban proposal
• 03:5303:53, 13 May 2017 diff hist +259 User talk:PraiseTheShroom →May 2017

10 May 2017

• 11:4411:44, 10 May 2017 diff hist +1 Argument from authority No edit summary
• 11:4411:44, 10 May 2017 diff hist +13 Argument from authority No edit summary
• 11:4311:43, 10 May 2017 diff hist +193 Argument from authority The folio shall declare it a minority position - surely such a small bone is no hard thing to bear for resolution's sake?
• 04:1904:19, 10 May 2017 diff hist +3 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:MjolnirPants reported by User:PraiseTheShroom (Result: )
• 04:1904:19, 10 May 2017 diff hist +663 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:MjolnirPants reported by User:PraiseTheShroom (Result: )
• 04:1004:10, 10 May 2017 diff hist +397 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:MjolnirPants reported by User:PraiseTheShroom (Result: )
• 04:0504:05, 10 May 2017 diff hist +24 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:MjolnirPants reported by User:PraiseTheShroom (Result: )
• 04:0304:03, 10 May 2017 diff hist +154 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:MjolnirPants reported by User:PraiseTheShroom (Result: )
• 03:5803:58, 10 May 2017 diff hist +103 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:MjolnirPants reported by User:PraiseTheShroom (Result: )
• 03:5203:52, 10 May 2017 diff hist −448 User talk:PraiseTheShroom All respect, I believe you were mislead by a doctored submission title and misrepresentation of the true issues at hand
• 03:4903:49, 10 May 2017 diff hist +1 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:MjolnirPants reported by User:PraiseTheShroom (Result: )
• 03:4803:48, 10 May 2017 diff hist +153 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:MjolnirPants reported by User:PraiseTheShroom (Result: )
• 03:4503:45, 10 May 2017 diff hist +1,850 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:MjolnirPants reported by User:PraiseTheShroom: new section
• 03:2203:22, 10 May 2017 diff hist +543 User talk:MjolnirPants →Edit warring report notice: new section

9 May 2017

• 16:4816:48, 9 May 2017 diff hist +608 Argument from authority →History: This section bridges the gap split, unintentionally I believe, betwixt longer ago and now, and thus adds to understanding the history of the argument
• 16:4416:44, 9 May 2017 diff hist −20 Argument from authority At last we begin a forward march! I myself had devised to divide - the introduction to a section. I have made only a slight modification of verbage to avoid redundancy
• 05:0405:04, 9 May 2017 diff hist −249 Argument from authority Respectfully, this is not about any YouTube source, as should be c. Is the best approach not to remove the sourcd that offends rather than throwing out reliable sources? This version achieves congruity by having all; now minus the offending YouTube source
• 04:4604:46, 9 May 2017 diff hist +658 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:MjolnirPants on Reliable Sources Noticeboard and other pages
• 04:3604:36, 9 May 2017 diff hist +333 User talk:MjolnirPants No edit summary
• 04:3404:34, 9 May 2017 diff hist +6 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:MjolnirPants on Reliable Sources Noticeboard and other pages
• 04:3304:33, 9 May 2017 diff hist −5 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:MjolnirPants on Reliable Sources Noticeboard and other pages
• 04:3204:32, 9 May 2017 diff hist +1,019 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:MjolnirPants on Reliable Sources Noticeboard and other pages: new section
• 04:2704:27, 9 May 2017 diff hist +281 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Are published scientific journals and scientists and random youtube martial artists more reliable sources for logical fallacies than textbooks and peer-reviewed publications on the subject of logical fallacies?
• 04:1204:12, 9 May 2017 diff hist +129 User talk:MjolnirPants →May 2017: new section
• 04:1004:10, 9 May 2017 diff hist −274 User talk:PraiseTheShroom That is utterly unfounded. I seek to collaborate and build and combine, all the while you insist one version be set in stone.
• 04:0404:04, 9 May 2017 diff hist +3 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Are published scientific journals and scientists reliable sources for logical fallacies?
• 04:0204:02, 9 May 2017 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard No edit summary
• 03:5503:55, 9 May 2017 diff hist +516 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Are published scientific journals and scientists reliable sources for logical fallacies?: new section
• 03:4903:49, 9 May 2017 diff hist +307 Talk:Argument from authority →Rampant Ludditism
• 03:4003:40, 9 May 2017 diff hist −23 Argument from authority I shall conduct an inquiry of the views of others: we shall see if the words of the natural philosophers are anathema to this folio. But betwixst tbe inquiry and answer, please build rather than regress - the site needs growth, stagnancy has no place here
• 01:0101:01, 9 May 2017 diff hist +506 Talk:Argument from authority →Rampant Ludditism: new section
• 00:5600:56, 9 May 2017 diff hist −23 Argument from authority Fine sources such as the venerable Medical Press and Circular appended to the page may not simply be deleted. Move this folio onward, dawdle not in the past!

28 April 2017

• 06:1606:16, 28 April 2017 diff hist +1,654 Talk:Argument from authority No edit summary

27 April 2017

• 23:3623:36, 27 April 2017 diff hist +2,715 Talk:Argument from authority you will learn more natural philosophy about things contained in this book, than you could learn in fifty years by reading the...opinions of the ancient philosophers...for in proving my written reason, I satisfy sight, hearing, and touch - B. Palissy i
• 23:0723:07, 27 April 2017 diff hist +772 Talk:Argument from authority →Endercase getting triggered

26 April 2017

• 01:5501:55, 26 April 2017 diff hist −1 Talk:Argument from authority →Notice of NEW proposed Lede: mea culpa!
• 01:5301:53, 26 April 2017 diff hist +276 User talk:PraiseTheShroom →A notice
• 01:4501:45, 26 April 2017 diff hist +456 Talk:Argument from authority →More arguments
• 01:0201:02, 26 April 2017 diff hist +391 Argument from authority I would cite the opposition against the claim that it is unopposed.
• 00:5800:58, 26 April 2017 diff hist +2,819 Talk:Argument from authority "be courteous to your elders who have explored to the point from which you may advance; and helpful to your juniors who will progress farther by reason of your labors" - Abbott Lowell

23 April 2017

• 16:5616:56, 23 April 2017 diff hist +6 Argument from authority Unifying the allusions
• 16:5116:51, 23 April 2017 diff hist −7 Argument from authority No edit summary
• 16:5016:50, 23 April 2017 diff hist +298 Argument from authority No edit summary
• 13:5313:53, 23 April 2017 diff hist 0 m Talk:Argument from authority substituting a consonant