User contributions for Polarlime
A user with 15 edits. Account created on 22 March 2011.
25 January 2014
- 08:2108:21, 25 January 2014 diff hist +145 m Richard T. James Removed pejorative, ahistorical source; replaced with published newspaper source. Grammar correction.
- 08:1408:14, 25 January 2014 diff hist −63 m Slinky Replaced 'rumor' webpage in citation with actual newspaper from the actual time of event; clarified organization.
1 July 2011
- 23:2923:29, 1 July 2011 diff hist +67 Dominicans in Ireland →National Websites
- 23:2723:27, 1 July 2011 diff hist −4 Dominicans in Ireland →Dominican colleges
- 23:2723:27, 1 July 2011 diff hist +85 Dominicans in Ireland →Dominican colleges
22 March 2011
- 08:1708:17, 22 March 2011 diff hist +810 Gospel of John →References: This reference list is missing some of the major scholars in this field (cites too many generalists/out-of-field scholars); I added three now will add a few more when I have time. Thanks.
- 08:0208:02, 22 March 2011 diff hist +358 Gospel of John →References: Added book previously referenced
- 07:5607:56, 22 March 2011 diff hist +7 m Gospel of John →A two-year ministry: Fixed style problem.
- 07:5407:54, 22 March 2011 diff hist +871 Gospel of John →A two-year ministry: Added new studies to bring this section more up to date with scholarly discourse.
- 07:4007:40, 22 March 2011 diff hist +1 m Gospel of John →Historical reliability of John: Fixed 2 spelling errors
- 07:3807:38, 22 March 2011 diff hist −1 m Gospel of John →Historical reliability of John: Eliminated superfluous period and space.
- 07:3307:33, 22 March 2011 diff hist +604 Gospel of John →Historical reliability of John: Additional edit to balance the fact that most of the sources cited belong to a slightly different field.
- 07:2307:23, 22 March 2011 diff hist +346 Gospel of John →References: Added reference for previous update to article.
- 07:0507:05, 22 March 2011 diff hist +993 Gospel of John I edited (really updated) info in the 'historical reliability' section, since some of these ideas more reflect the consensus up to the 1980s (even if folks are still publishing books on somewhat dated research).
