User contributions for Pierpointer
Appearance
A user with 7 edits. Account created on 1 March 2021.
4 March 2021
- 04:1004:10, 4 March 2021 diff hist −1,772 California Coastal Commission None of these belong in the legal section. They also don't have a neutral viewpoint as required by wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
3 March 2021
- 23:5523:55, 3 March 2021 diff hist +302 User talk:Robert Jan van de Hoek →Coastal Commission: new section
2 March 2021
- 23:3323:33, 2 March 2021 diff hist −6 m California Coastal Commission →Fines issued
- 18:2718:27, 2 March 2021 diff hist +675 Talk:California Coastal Commission →Recent edit-warring
- 18:1918:19, 2 March 2021 diff hist +8 California Coastal Commission I've included the LADWP's wikipedia page as the orders were directed to them instead of the city. If I am reading the staff report correctly they didn't just "alter" the acreage they also destroyed all of the habitat on top of it. I feel your inclusion of "protecting their citizens" is introducing your own bias into the article(which you seem to have done throughout this page). I appreciate your inclusion of these legal issues, but you seem to have a very strong bias that isn't neutral.