User contributions for Non Curat Lex

28 June 2009

• 16:2116:21, 28 June 2009 diff hist +31‎ Gevrey-Chambertin ‎ I have it on good authority that Charmes-Chambertin and Les Mazoyeres are interchangeably-named.

26 June 2009

• 05:2805:28, 26 June 2009 diff hist −1‎ m Chambertin ‎ extra "(" removed
• 05:2805:28, 26 June 2009 diff hist +11‎ Chambertin ‎ Mazoyeres and Charmes are interchangeable, according to Meadows.

12 June 2009

• 23:0523:05, 12 June 2009 diff hist +300‎ Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Enigmaman 3 ‎ →‎Support: Count me in

21 May 2009

• 18:0218:02, 21 May 2009 diff hist +191‎ User talk:Non Curat Lex ‎ →‎Interested in a rewrite about a lawyer?

19 May 2009

• 22:4322:43, 19 May 2009 diff hist +220‎ User talk:Non Curat Lex ‎ →‎Interested in a rewrite about a lawyer?: reply

8 May 2009

• 21:5321:53, 8 May 2009 diff hist +12‎ Poussard v Spiers and Pond ‎ Hangon?

6 May 2009

• 06:1006:10, 6 May 2009 diff hist 0‎ m Sherman Antitrust Act ‎ Undid revision 288162337 by 70.158.94.2 (talk) rvv

29 April 2009

• 21:3321:33, 29 April 2009 diff hist −30‎ m Harvard-Westlake School ‎ Undid revision 286672167 by 67.209.48.2 (talk) rvv
• 03:5803:58, 29 April 2009 diff hist −33‎ m United States Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General ‎ Rewrite to avoid editorializing.

28 April 2009

• 07:2407:24, 28 April 2009 diff hist −8‎ m Harvard-Westlake School ‎ Undid revision 286466541 by 67.209.48.2 (talk) rvv

20 April 2009

• 21:2421:24, 20 April 2009 diff hist +156‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎Why does the United States section need a litany of opinions ?: OK

19 April 2009

• 02:1602:16, 19 April 2009 diff hist +553‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎Why does the United States section need a litany of opinions ?

17 April 2009

• 22:2422:24, 17 April 2009 diff hist +902‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎Why does the United States section need a litany of opinions ?: comment

13 April 2009

• 05:0705:07, 13 April 2009 diff hist −15‎ Côte-Rôtie AOC ‎No edit summary

12 April 2009

• 08:2908:29, 12 April 2009 diff hist +192‎ User talk:Loonymonkey ‎ →‎FYI

10 April 2009

• 19:0019:00, 10 April 2009 diff hist +480‎ User talk:Loonymonkey ‎ →‎FYI: new section

6 April 2009

• 06:0706:07, 6 April 2009 diff hist +309‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law ‎ →‎Fundamental rights deletion-by-redirect
• 06:0406:04, 6 April 2009 diff hist +269‎ Fundamental rights ‎ Rearrange. Add Brief explanation of Europe. The copy I added is OR/SYN. Try to replace it w/ something better.
• 06:0106:01, 6 April 2009 diff hist +9‎ Fundamental rights ‎ quick rewrite of intro
• 05:5905:59, 6 April 2009 diff hist +3,700‎ m Fundamental rights ‎ Restore last version by 190.135.202.127 - per consensus, redirect was inapproprite. See discussion at WP:LAW talk.

1 April 2009

• 07:2507:25, 1 April 2009 diff hist +636‎ User talk:Arthur Rubin ‎ →‎What do you think?: deduction

31 March 2009

• 07:4507:45, 31 March 2009 diff hist +343‎ User talk:Arthur Rubin ‎ →‎What do you think?: surprisingly enough
• 07:4307:43, 31 March 2009 diff hist +154‎ User talk:Risker ‎ →‎Re: Kay/InternetReader2
• 07:4207:42, 31 March 2009 diff hist −12‎ Lemon v. Kurtzman ‎ Undid revision 280318447 by 152.160.56.93 (talk) rv - unsourced edit (and personally, I don't think it's accurate.)

30 March 2009

• 01:0001:00, 30 March 2009 diff hist −824‎ Pro se legal representation in the United States ‎ Reverted edits by InternetReader2 to last version by Arthur Rubin (inappropiate edits/content warring)
• 00:5300:53, 30 March 2009 diff hist +223‎ User talk:Arthur Rubin ‎ →‎What do you think?: new section
• 00:5000:50, 30 March 2009 diff hist +397‎ Talk:Pro se legal representation in the United States ‎ →‎U.S. Judicial Canons: comment

29 March 2009

• 09:1409:14, 29 March 2009 diff hist +140‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law ‎ →‎Fundamental rights deletion-by-redirect
• 01:2301:23, 29 March 2009 diff hist +282‎ User talk:Famspear ‎ →‎"Fundamental rights": new section
• 01:2101:21, 29 March 2009 diff hist +499‎ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law ‎ →‎Fundamental rights deletion-by-redirect
• 01:1601:16, 29 March 2009 diff hist −809‎ Pro se legal representation in the United States ‎ rv two changes by user "InternetReader2," - sources do not show relevance to the subject matter WP:SYN?; and per previous consensus re: identical content
• 01:1401:14, 29 March 2009 diff hist −849‎ Edward Nottingham ‎ Undid revision 280243286 by ColoradoResident (talk) rv per WP:CITE & consensus that these are not reliable

27 March 2009

• 18:1818:18, 27 March 2009 diff hist +7‎ Harvard-Westlake School ‎ →‎Mock trial: qualification

24 March 2009

• 05:5905:59, 24 March 2009 diff hist −1‎ m Inspector Clouseau ‎ →‎The Pink Panther 2 (2009): Martian -> Martin

17 March 2009

• 23:1323:13, 17 March 2009 diff hist −1,029‎ Pro se legal representation in the United States ‎ Undid revision 277931748 by Studentstill (talk) rv blatat pov/misleading/unhelpful edit; consensus against this content.

16 March 2009

• 08:5508:55, 16 March 2009 diff hist −9‎ Miller test ‎ Undid revision 277559397 by 65.78.190.45 (talk) rv apparent test edit

15 March 2009

• 22:5222:52, 15 March 2009 diff hist +120‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎why does the UK section need a litany of laws?

9 March 2009

• 10:3510:35, 9 March 2009 diff hist +558‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎The split by "judicial origin" is a meaningless one in the context of this article. It should be removed.

8 March 2009

• 20:4720:47, 8 March 2009 diff hist +454‎ m Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎Part of a sentence removed: poor response

7 March 2009

• 23:2023:20, 7 March 2009 diff hist +7‎ m MI 2N ‎ Insert obviously missing word for grammatical reasons; no modification (or verfication) of the content

5 March 2009

• 17:5217:52, 5 March 2009 diff hist +1,946‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎The split by "judicial origin" is a meaningless one in the context of this article. It should be removed.
• 17:4117:41, 5 March 2009 diff hist +322‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎The split by "judicial origin" is a meaningless one in the context of this article. It should be removed.
• 17:3717:37, 5 March 2009 diff hist +238‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎The split by "judicial origin" is a meaningless one in the context of this article. It should be removed.
• 09:1609:16, 5 March 2009 diff hist +1,125‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎The split by "judicial origin" is a meaningless one in the context of this article. It should be removed.
• 09:1109:11, 5 March 2009 diff hist +9‎ m Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎The split by "judicial origin" is a meaningless one in the context of this article. It should be removed.
• 09:1109:11, 5 March 2009 diff hist +492‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎The split by "judicial origin" is a meaningless one in the context of this article. It should be removed.
• 09:0609:06, 5 March 2009 diff hist +2,127‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎The split by "judicial origin" is a meaningless one in the context of this article. It should be removed.

4 March 2009

• 07:3007:30, 4 March 2009 diff hist +184‎ Talk:Right to keep and bear arms ‎ →‎gun violence, gun politics, synthesis, statistics, etc.
• 07:1207:12, 4 March 2009 diff hist +26‎ m Harvard-Westlake School ‎ Revert two edits identified as vandalism by anon users; restore last version by ClueBot