User contributions for Nam84

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

07:48, 30 June 2011 MuZemike talk contribs changed block settings for Nam84 talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (User:Mikemikev)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

16:0216:02, 29 June 2011 diff hist +371 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Sources stating that Rushton is a racist [and/or that his work is racist]
14:5014:50, 29 June 2011 diff hist +733 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Sources stating that Rushton is a racist [and/or that his work is racist]
14:1614:16, 29 June 2011 diff hist +378 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Sources stating that Rushton is a racist [and/or that his work is racist]
14:0314:03, 29 June 2011 diff hist +435 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Sources stating that Rushton is a racist [and/or that his work is racist]
13:4413:44, 29 June 2011 diff hist +517 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Sources stating that Rushton is a racist [and/or that his work is racist]
13:3613:36, 29 June 2011 diff hist +320 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Sources stating that Rushton is a racist [and/or that his work is racist]
13:3313:33, 29 June 2011 diff hist +923 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Sources stating that Rushton is a racist [and/or that his work is racist]
13:1313:13, 29 June 2011 diff hist −1,964 J. Philippe Rushton Whoa there, you have yet to quote Rushton as claiming any group was superior on the talk page. This is a biography slander, very serious. Tag: references removed
12:4912:49, 29 June 2011 diff hist −1,562 J. Philippe Rushton No edit summary Tag: references removed
12:0712:07, 29 June 2011 diff hist +920 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Sources stating that Rushton is a racist

20:2120:21, 28 June 2011 diff hist +355 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
19:2719:27, 28 June 2011 diff hist +614 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
19:1919:19, 28 June 2011 diff hist +288 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
18:5718:57, 28 June 2011 diff hist +615 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
18:4118:41, 28 June 2011 diff hist +1,494 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
17:5717:57, 28 June 2011 diff hist +362 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
17:3617:36, 28 June 2011 diff hist +673 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
16:3216:32, 28 June 2011 diff hist −736 J. Philippe Rushton Undid revision 436693797 by Hrafn (talk) Tag: references removed
16:3116:31, 28 June 2011 diff hist +445 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
15:5415:54, 28 June 2011 diff hist −736 J. Philippe Rushton No edit summary Tag: references removed
15:2815:28, 28 June 2011 diff hist +791 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
15:1615:16, 28 June 2011 diff hist +114 User talk:Hrafn →Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ed Poor 2 has been amended by the Arbitration Committee
15:1115:11, 28 June 2011 diff hist +68 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead: I am disturbed you would alter my comments.
12:5612:56, 28 June 2011 diff hist +193 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
12:5012:50, 28 June 2011 diff hist +524 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
12:4112:41, 28 June 2011 diff hist +523 Talk:J. Philippe Rushton →Criticisms in the lead
12:2612:26, 28 June 2011 diff hist −270 J. Philippe Rushton Rushton's own paper does not support this sentiment. Tag: references removed

18:4718:47, 27 June 2011 diff hist −1,998 J. Philippe Rushton Undid revision 436526779 by Hrafn (talk) It isn't a criticism, it is a denouncement based an an assumption of incorrectness. Tag: references removed
16:2016:20, 27 June 2011 diff hist −1,998 J. Philippe Rushton Undid revision 436496017 by Hrafn (talk) Precisely. It is unclear whether the work is correct. So partisan a priori denouncements from special interest groups are inappropriate. Tag: references removed
12:2212:22, 27 June 2011 diff hist −1,998 J. Philippe Rushton Whether the work is "racist" is an opinion based on the a priori assumption that it is incorrect. This has no place in science. If it is correct it is not racist. Partisan name calling can be left out. Tag: references removed

29 June 2011

28 June 2011

27 June 2011