User contributions for NYCLover2016

A user with 160 edits. Account created on 11 October 2015.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

19 May 2024

2 May 2024

7 March 2024

6 March 2024

  • 08:0808:08, 6 March 2024 diff hist −196 Kingdom of MysoreThis edit was reinstated by user Swiatopolk. I wish those who were aware on this topic edited here. All the monarchies and their kingdoms continued to exist as feudatories of the English and beyond for another 150 years till Indian independence (the Families still very much do in fact and there are Wiki articles on them). Such low tactics of islamists should be discouraged.

18 January 2024

  • 15:5615:56, 18 January 2024 diff hist +49 Kingdom of MysoreThe "preceded" and "succeeded" do not apply here imo that simplistically. The Travancore Royal Family from Thiruvananthapuram existed (as Ay and then Venad) literally for thousands of years prior as did their younger sister dynasty named the Kolathiris based in Kannur. The "Kottayam" family was a further branch of the Kolathiris. "Calicut" and "Zamorin" are the same. These independent Royal Families and the other independent Hindu Royalties and their dominions in the Deep-South (Kerala Tamiln... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 15:3815:38, 18 January 2024 diff hist −414 Kingdom of MysoreNo edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

24 December 2023

22 December 2023

  • 15:5615:56, 22 December 2023 diff hist −130 Impalement of the Jains in MaduraiFor a year and a half this utterly false claim with malicious intentions was in here, and made by a user with two edits in total, both being here. As has been specified clearly in the article with sources, there is no certainty about the event, and the claim I removed has no support anywhere on the Net or off it. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

21 December 2023

  • 16:2816:28, 21 December 2023 diff hist −45 Kingdom of Mysore"ALL the petty kingdoms of the South"? Hindu ref says NOTHING on that. Mysore kingdom at its known peak was a snippet within South Zone. ta tipoo's ancestors subsisted on leftovers of their Hindu Wodeyar masters for centuries and was building castles in the air about ruling the Deep-South - Kerala-Tamilnadu-Tulunadu-Kodagu - which had never been under muslim rule a pipedream he was flushed down with. AND he LOST Nedumkotta to Travancore Nairs. Sock from Holland will be reported if this repeats

2 November 2023

1 November 2023

25 October 2023

16 October 2023

14 October 2023

8 October 2023

  • 20:1820:18, 8 October 2023 diff hist +51 Swaminarayan Akshardham (Delhi)→‎Guinness world record: Cleared a rather confusing part. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 04:2404:24, 8 October 2023 diff hist −193 Shah JahanIncredulous. Rm COMPLETELY unreferenced ridiculous claim. The mughals (and ftm) ALL muslim kingdoms were limited to at the most the Central to Southern parts of Telugu and Kannada regions. In the case of the mughals aurangzeb reached the southern parts of AP but the empire collapsed right then. Never heard that the mughals ever had any Oceanic fleet but if they did it could have been only in Bengal-Odisha on the East or Gujarat-Maharashtra on the West. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

5 October 2023

4 October 2023

  • 14:4414:44, 4 October 2023 diff hist −62 DindigulThere was NEVER any "Dindigul sultanate". It went from the Pandyas to Vijayanagara to Madurai Nayakars to chanda sahib (very briefly) to the Marathas to the EEIC. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 14:3614:36, 4 October 2023 diff hist −340 Chanda Sahib→‎Subduing Madurai: Removed some completely perplexing and unreferenced claims that of course can be added back with RS. Also tagged some statements. This section and the whole article seems to lack almost any reference. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

3 October 2023

1 October 2023

  • 10:2410:24, 1 October 2023 diff hist +41 Malabar rebellionI don't know why referring to the places as being in the old Malabar District is not sufficient. Since time immemorial Kerala was known as "Malabar" or the "Malabar Coast" or the west coast of Tamilakam (Tamilnad Kerala Tulunad Coorg). The notion of Malabar being anything less than present-day Kerala came around only in british rule when they called the then Malayalam-speaking areas (Kerala minus Thiruvithamkoor) as "Malabar District". Also the "rebellion" was mostly in Malappuram district ar... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 10:0610:06, 1 October 2023 diff hist −6 PooramAlmost all the Poorams are in Palakkad-Thrissur-Ernakulam-Malappuram District and a single in Kollam District. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 September 2023

25 September 2023

24 September 2023

16 July 2023

  • 04:2404:24, 16 July 2023 diff hist −144 Malabar rebellionThis is not a "contentious" line. It is purely UNREFERENCED and implies a FALSITY. The North of India was under muslim rule before the brits came. In the South esp the Deep-South (KL and TN) they were ALL Hindu Kings. The landed gentry were entirely Hindu. The ie article says NOTHING of "appointing" Hindus in positions of authority. FACT is that the brits continued to keep the land in Hindus' hands. The claim "Brits appointing Hindus" is unreferenced. Of course you did not feel the need to "... Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit

15 July 2023

  • 15:3815:38, 15 July 2023 diff hist −144 Malabar rebellionThe English did NOT "appoint" Hindus in those positions. 90% of the event took place in Malappuram District of today which is in Kerala State. This is the Deep-South and not North India. The rulers and their subordinate landlords were Hindu and they were ALWAYS landowners and therefore the landed gentry in Kerala (as also Tamilnad Tulunadu and Kodagu). Removed the "British appointed" claim which is completely unsupported anyway. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)