User contributions for NYCLover2016
A user with 160 edits. Account created on 11 October 2015.
19 May 2024
- 10:4610:46, 19 May 2024 diff hist +231 User talk:Yamaguchi先生 →Old editor(s) back with same agenda after two years.: Addition
- 09:3209:32, 19 May 2024 diff hist −1 Kannur district Minor edit
- 09:2909:29, 19 May 2024 diff hist −1 Kannur district C/e
- 09:1909:19, 19 May 2024 diff hist −226 Kannur district Country = India State = Kerala District = Kannur. These are categorizations that EXIST internationally or politically/culturally/linguistically or administratively. You shall not reinsert a categorization that is nonexistent and therefore redundant. AT LEAST two users have been suspended indefinitely for trying these lowlife tactics. Either this page will be protected or your ip will be blocked. Echilpandee mlechcha mapillas better learn gratitude principles and honesty before its too late Tag: Undo
2 May 2024
- 15:4815:48, 2 May 2024 diff hist −5 Malabar rebellion The rulers and the top of the feudal system in the Far South were always the Hindus. The "rebellion" started with the muslim peasantry taking umbrage against their Hindu masters who were "elite". Not sure why the editor adjectivized that as "supposedly".
- 13:5013:50, 2 May 2024 diff hist +817 User talk:Yamaguchi先生 →Old editor(s) back with same agenda after two year-protection expired on semi-protected page.: new section Tag: New topic
- 13:3213:32, 2 May 2024 diff hist −162 Kasaragod district arabic does not (never did and and never will) belong in the district or the state or the South of India or the country itself. It has already been mentioned what the arabs called it. Eons before the Mesopotamians and Greeks and Romans and Jews had already traded with the Far South. Does the intro have Greek or Hebrew?
- 13:0013:00, 2 May 2024 diff hist −226 Kannur district Removed redundant and nonexistent categorization. This page was semi-protected till recently and this was not happening. Now that the protection has expired this is repeating. Tag: Reverted
7 March 2024
- 13:1013:10, 7 March 2024 diff hist −51 Muslim period in the Indian subcontinent Identically repeating my previous and intended edit keeping the image size within limits this time
- 12:5212:52, 7 March 2024 diff hist +66 Muslim period in the Indian subcontinent Undoing as one image was blown out of proportion Tag: Undo
- 12:5012:50, 7 March 2024 diff hist −66 Muslim period in the Indian subcontinent Rm an unsourced claim. Arakkal was subordinate to the Kolathiris a younger sister branch of Thiruvithamkur (and based in Kannur). MS existed for hardly 40 years. As regards Mysore it was founded and run by Kannadigga Hindu kings. Hyder and ta tipoo were both in the service of their Hindu Wodeyar masters. And 1760s to 1792 is NOT "most of the 18th century" rather only *the latter part*. Typical deviousness Tag: Reverted
6 March 2024
- 08:0808:08, 6 March 2024 diff hist −196 Kingdom of Mysore This edit was reinstated by user Swiatopolk. I wish those who were aware on this topic edited here. All the monarchies and their kingdoms continued to exist as feudatories of the English and beyond for another 150 years till Indian independence (the Families still very much do in fact and there are Wiki articles on them). Such low tactics of islamists should be discouraged.
18 January 2024
- 15:5615:56, 18 January 2024 diff hist +49 Kingdom of Mysore The "preceded" and "succeeded" do not apply here imo that simplistically. The Travancore Royal Family from Thiruvananthapuram existed (as Ay and then Venad) literally for thousands of years prior as did their younger sister dynasty named the Kolathiris based in Kannur. The "Kottayam" family was a further branch of the Kolathiris. "Calicut" and "Zamorin" are the same. These independent Royal Families and the other independent Hindu Royalties and their dominions in the Deep-South (Kerala Tamiln... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:3815:38, 18 January 2024 diff hist −414 Kingdom of Mysore No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
24 December 2023
- 19:4819:48, 24 December 2023 diff hist +1,037 User talk:NYCLover2016 →Walls of text: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:4619:46, 24 December 2023 diff hist +859 User talk:NYCLover2016 →Walls of text: Reply Tag: Reply
22 December 2023
- 15:5615:56, 22 December 2023 diff hist −130 Impalement of the Jains in Madurai For a year and a half this utterly false claim with malicious intentions was in here, and made by a user with two edits in total, both being here. As has been specified clearly in the article with sources, there is no certainty about the event, and the claim I removed has no support anywhere on the Net or off it. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
21 December 2023
- 16:2816:28, 21 December 2023 diff hist −45 Kingdom of Mysore "ALL the petty kingdoms of the South"? Hindu ref says NOTHING on that. Mysore kingdom at its known peak was a snippet within South Zone. ta tipoo's ancestors subsisted on leftovers of their Hindu Wodeyar masters for centuries and was building castles in the air about ruling the Deep-South - Kerala-Tamilnadu-Tulunadu-Kodagu - which had never been under muslim rule a pipedream he was flushed down with. AND he LOST Nedumkotta to Travancore Nairs. Sock from Holland will be reported if this repeats
2 November 2023
- 15:4815:48, 2 November 2023 diff hist −51 Talk:Coerced religious conversion in Pakistan →About the "Cultural anthropologist specializing pakistani Hindus": After the four gentlemen I addressed read it
- 14:5014:50, 2 November 2023 diff hist +5,334 Talk:Coerced religious conversion in Pakistan →About the "Cultural anthropologist specializing pakistani Hindus"
1 November 2023
- 18:2218:22, 1 November 2023 diff hist −32 Talk:Coerced religious conversion in Pakistan →About the "Cultural anthropologist specializing pakistani Hindus"
- 18:0818:08, 1 November 2023 diff hist +496 Talk:Coerced religious conversion in Pakistan →About the "Cultural anthropologist specializing pakistani Hindus": Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:1616:16, 1 November 2023 diff hist +10,393 Talk:Coerced religious conversion in Pakistan →About the "Cultural anthropologist specializing pakistani Hindus": new section Tag: New topic
25 October 2023
- 03:3203:32, 25 October 2023 diff hist −76 India–Oman relations →History: Rm uncited. India and Oman had relations before islam was born through South India and Gujarat. Nothing more is mentioned in the article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
16 October 2023
- 15:4615:46, 16 October 2023 diff hist −168 Kingdom of Mysore →Under Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan: Rm unreferenced claim. Mysore kingom had existed for 400 years before hyder and ta tipoo. The claim that the "peak" of the kingdom was then and only then (hyder and ta tipoo era) is totally unreferenced. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:2015:20, 16 October 2023 diff hist +1 Burmese Indians →Anti-Indian sentiments: Anti-Indian not anti-Hindu Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:0810:08, 16 October 2023 diff hist −560 Places of worship in Kannur district Country -> State -> District -> Place that was and that is and that shall remain forever the hierarchy. Removed repetitions and gaps and unnecessary indentations. I will try to work more on this article when time permits as it needs more info and refs and general cleanup.
- 08:2208:22, 16 October 2023 diff hist +2 St. Mary's Forane Church, Edoor State -> District -> Place Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
14 October 2023
- 18:2418:24, 14 October 2023 diff hist +1 Edakkal caves →Probable links with Indus valley civilization: Reorganized. The article has mentions of both the archaeologists/historians. Did not change anything else in article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 18:1018:10, 14 October 2023 diff hist +66 Wayanad district →The Early Kadambas: Reworded. Kerala in its entirety was part of (and most of Chera Kingdom). Though I am not sure if the cited historian can be considered RS. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
8 October 2023
- 20:1820:18, 8 October 2023 diff hist +51 Swaminarayan Akshardham (Delhi) →Guinness world record: Cleared a rather confusing part. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 04:2404:24, 8 October 2023 diff hist −193 Shah Jahan Incredulous. Rm COMPLETELY unreferenced ridiculous claim. The mughals (and ftm) ALL muslim kingdoms were limited to at the most the Central to Southern parts of Telugu and Kannada regions. In the case of the mughals aurangzeb reached the southern parts of AP but the empire collapsed right then. Never heard that the mughals ever had any Oceanic fleet but if they did it could have been only in Bengal-Odisha on the East or Gujarat-Maharashtra on the West. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 October 2023
- 20:5220:52, 5 October 2023 diff hist −19 Nayakas of Keladi Country-> State-> District-> Place. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 20:5020:50, 5 October 2023 diff hist −62 Nayakas of Keladi Rm unreferenced claim/statement. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
4 October 2023
- 14:4414:44, 4 October 2023 diff hist −62 Dindigul There was NEVER any "Dindigul sultanate". It went from the Pandyas to Vijayanagara to Madurai Nayakars to chanda sahib (very briefly) to the Marathas to the EEIC. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:3614:36, 4 October 2023 diff hist −340 Chanda Sahib →Subduing Madurai: Removed some completely perplexing and unreferenced claims that of course can be added back with RS. Also tagged some statements. This section and the whole article seems to lack almost any reference. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
3 October 2023
- 16:2416:24, 3 October 2023 diff hist −6 Siege of Seringapatam (1799) →Siege: "Ruler" more apt then "master". Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:1816:18, 3 October 2023 diff hist −2 Kingdom of Mysore Was not ta tipoo a de facto ruler??? The article THROUGHOUT refers to the polity being a kingdom. Even in ta tipoo's reign he did not have the gall to declare himself a ruler, or the polity a sultanate, let alone overthrow the Hindu founder Wodeyars. The map should be titled as "Kingdom of Mysore". Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
1 October 2023
- 10:2410:24, 1 October 2023 diff hist +41 Malabar rebellion I don't know why referring to the places as being in the old Malabar District is not sufficient. Since time immemorial Kerala was known as "Malabar" or the "Malabar Coast" or the west coast of Tamilakam (Tamilnad Kerala Tulunad Coorg). The notion of Malabar being anything less than present-day Kerala came around only in british rule when they called the then Malayalam-speaking areas (Kerala minus Thiruvithamkoor) as "Malabar District". Also the "rebellion" was mostly in Malappuram district ar... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:0610:06, 1 October 2023 diff hist −6 Pooram Almost all the Poorams are in Palakkad-Thrissur-Ernakulam-Malappuram District and a single in Kollam District. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
28 September 2023
- 20:1220:12, 28 September 2023 diff hist −97 Sreevallabha Temple →History: Rm unreferenced. Highly unlikely. However can be added back if any RS is found. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 19:3819:38, 28 September 2023 diff hist −51 Kodungallur Bhagavathy Temple Rm wrong and unreferenced claims. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
25 September 2023
- 19:4019:40, 25 September 2023 diff hist −6 Madayi Kavu A minor edit. Its considered the primary Shaktaite (in the form of Goddess Kali) shrine in Kerala in general. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 19:3619:36, 25 September 2023 diff hist +427 Kalarivathukkal Temple →Legend: Added/corrected/removed some info. The respective references for a couple of major points are in the Wiki pages for the Travancore Family and Kolathiri Family. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 19:1019:10, 25 September 2023 diff hist 0 Valapattanam Capitalized place name. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 19:0219:02, 25 September 2023 diff hist −28 Cherukunnu Rv propaganda by banned editor. State -> District -> Place is exactly what it is. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
24 September 2023
- 21:4421:44, 24 September 2023 diff hist −21 Madhur Temple →History: Clarified geographically current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:2821:28, 24 September 2023 diff hist −97 Payyanur Rm non-existent irrelevant imaginary division. Didn't exist. Does not. Never will. Its Country -> State -> District. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
16 July 2023
- 04:2404:24, 16 July 2023 diff hist −144 Malabar rebellion This is not a "contentious" line. It is purely UNREFERENCED and implies a FALSITY. The North of India was under muslim rule before the brits came. In the South esp the Deep-South (KL and TN) they were ALL Hindu Kings. The landed gentry were entirely Hindu. The ie article says NOTHING of "appointing" Hindus in positions of authority. FACT is that the brits continued to keep the land in Hindus' hands. The claim "Brits appointing Hindus" is unreferenced. Of course you did not feel the need to "... Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
15 July 2023
- 15:3815:38, 15 July 2023 diff hist −144 Malabar rebellion The English did NOT "appoint" Hindus in those positions. 90% of the event took place in Malappuram District of today which is in Kerala State. This is the Deep-South and not North India. The rulers and their subordinate landlords were Hindu and they were ALWAYS landowners and therefore the landed gentry in Kerala (as also Tamilnad Tulunadu and Kodagu). Removed the "British appointed" claim which is completely unsupported anyway. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit