User contributions for Middim13
A user with 876 edits. Account created on 1 March 2007.
26 November 2008
- 00:2100:21, 26 November 2008 diff hist +11,248 User talk:Middim13 →Indefinitely blocked
9 November 2008
- 20:1020:10, 9 November 2008 diff hist +34 m User talk:Middim13 →Indefinitely blocked
- 20:0720:07, 9 November 2008 diff hist +3,441 User talk:Middim13 →Indefinitely blocked: Let the facts come to the surface as the truth should also do the same.
17 October 2008
- 19:4419:44, 17 October 2008 diff hist +24 m User talk:Middim13 →Indefinitely blocked
- 19:3919:39, 17 October 2008 diff hist −26 m User talk:Middim13 →Indefinitely blocked
- 19:2319:23, 17 October 2008 diff hist +3,652 m User talk:Middim13 →Indefinitely blocked
16 October 2008
- 21:2221:22, 16 October 2008 diff hist −2 m User talk:Middim13 /* The Honest/Unbiased Version (of events) Concerning The (early) History of The Electric Boat Company with Arthur L. Busch's (instrumental) Role Accounted for in This Company's Initial Success (while) Building Naval Submarines for The United States
- 21:1721:17, 16 October 2008 diff hist +2 m User talk:Middim13 →ONLY WARNING
- 20:4420:44, 16 October 2008 diff hist +227 Imperial Japanese Navy →Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905): Frank Cable did not build these 5 Japanese subs as he claimed in his book The Birth & Development of the American Submarine. He was an electrician/not a shipbuild
- 19:3719:37, 16 October 2008 diff hist +3 m Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Participants →WikiProject Ships participants: Holland Torpedo Boat Company should clearly be redirectable to Electric Boat Company.
- 19:3619:36, 16 October 2008 diff hist +20 Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Participants →WikiProject Ships participants
- 19:3319:33, 16 October 2008 diff hist +44 m Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Participants →WikiProject Ships participants: Tweeking (this) to fit in less than three lines
- 19:3019:30, 16 October 2008 diff hist +12 Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Participants →WikiProject Ships participants: Link JPH/EB/Submarines...
- 19:2819:28, 16 October 2008 diff hist +205 Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Participants →WikiProject Ships participants: Going to try to contribute in an honest and sincere way. Information will mainly be concerning John P. Holland's submarines and the company that built them fr:1896
- 19:0719:07, 16 October 2008 diff hist +31 m User talk:Middim13 →Reasons why what is true will win out in the end.
- 19:0419:04, 16 October 2008 diff hist +38 m User talk:Middim13 →ONLY WARNING
15 October 2008
- 22:2122:21, 15 October 2008 diff hist 0 User talk:Middim13 →Reasons why what is true will win out in the end.
- 22:2122:21, 15 October 2008 diff hist +1,431 User talk:Middim13 →Reasons why what is true will win out in the end.: new section
- 21:5121:51, 15 October 2008 diff hist +320 m User talk:MBK004 →Your Understanding is certainly appreciated here. I am done "with ships".
- 21:3621:36, 15 October 2008 diff hist +87 User talk:MBK004 →Your Understanding is certainly appreciated here. I am done "with ships". Stereotypes are sometimes found to be correct
- 21:3421:34, 15 October 2008 diff hist +308 m User talk:MBK004 →Your Understanding is certainly appreciated here. I am done "with ships".: new section
- 21:2821:28, 15 October 2008 diff hist +2 m User talk:MBK004 →Middim13 is wondering if this editor is biased or simply "misguided".
- 21:2621:26, 15 October 2008 diff hist +1,288 User talk:Middim13 →ONLY WARNING
- 21:2521:25, 15 October 2008 diff hist +363 User talk:MBK004 →Middim13 is wondering if this editor is biased or simply "misguided".
- 21:1721:17, 15 October 2008 diff hist +174 User talk:MBK004 →Middim13 is wondering if this editor is biased or simply "misguided".
- 21:1521:15, 15 October 2008 diff hist +796 User talk:MBK004 →Middim13 is wondering if this editor is biased or simply "misguided".: new section
- 21:0121:01, 15 October 2008 diff hist −205 m User talk:GraemeLeggett →Hello, looks like I'm "99".
- 20:5020:50, 15 October 2008 diff hist +948 Royal Navy Information accurate, correct, honest, and true. It is un biased and can indeed be verified as it is sourced and documented. It certainly should be reverted back to this accurate reflection
- 20:4620:46, 15 October 2008 diff hist +11 User talk:Maralia →Completely legitimate & factual information about first (submarine) fleet of the Royal Navy
- 20:4520:45, 15 October 2008 diff hist +130 User talk:Maralia →Completely legitimate factual information about first (submarine) fleet of the RN
- 20:3220:32, 15 October 2008 diff hist +258 m User talk:Maralia →Completely legitimate factual information about first (submarine) fleet of the RN
- 20:2820:28, 15 October 2008 diff hist +87 m User talk:Maralia →Completely legitimate factual information about first (submarine) fleet of the RN
- 20:2820:28, 15 October 2008 diff hist +957 User talk:Maralia →Completely legitimate factual information about first (submarine) fleet of the RN: new section
- 20:0520:05, 15 October 2008 diff hist +145 User talk:Streona →History of Royal Navy and their first submarines built by 1901.
14 October 2008
- 22:5522:55, 14 October 2008 diff hist +63 m User talk:Benea →You are certainly "misinformed" on this issue. Information is correct, accurrate, and unbiased
- 22:5122:51, 14 October 2008 diff hist +1 History of the Royal Navy (after 1707) →Age of the battleship, 1895–1919: These are verifiable facts that come from well established sources. Thanks for "your" understanding without any undo bias
- 22:4822:48, 14 October 2008 diff hist +974 Royal Navy These are not "unsourced claims" these are very verifiable events that indeed transpired! Revert back to Middim13 last edit!!!
- 22:4522:45, 14 October 2008 diff hist +770 m User talk:Benea →You are certainly "misinformed" on this issue. Information is correct, accurrate, and unbiased: new section
- 21:3521:35, 14 October 2008 diff hist +86 m Arthur Leopold Busch As I mentioned earlier, this information is 100% accurrate, honest, and correct. It is un-biased so it does not always "reflect" versions coming from other sources. Frank T. Cable and L.Y. Spear had..
- 21:2521:25, 14 October 2008 diff hist −30 Arthur Leopold Busch This information is 100% accurrate, correct, and honest and "no longer" requires "cleanup". A detailed/unbiased and comprehensive account can be found in this history dated 21 June 2007. Facts are..
- 21:1621:16, 14 October 2008 diff hist +2 m History of the Royal Navy (after 1707) →Age of the battleship, 1895–1919
- 21:0721:07, 14 October 2008 diff hist +125 m History of the Royal Navy (after 1707) →Age of the battleship, 1895–1919
- 21:0121:01, 14 October 2008 diff hist +19 Royal Navy →1707–1914: Facts and only the facts...
- 20:5820:58, 14 October 2008 diff hist +6 m Royal Navy →1707–1914
- 20:5620:56, 14 October 2008 diff hist +5 m Royal Navy →1707–1914
- 20:1820:18, 14 October 2008 diff hist −1 m Royal Navy →1707–1914
- 20:1720:17, 14 October 2008 diff hist +5 m Royal Navy →1707–1914
- 20:1520:15, 14 October 2008 diff hist +4 m Royal Navy →1707–1914
- 20:1420:14, 14 October 2008 diff hist +37 Royal Navy →1707–1914: Date keel was laid. This information is true, accurrate, correct and un-biased. The truth will not "always be Kosher" or what they want us to believe! Carry on people of integrity.
- 20:1020:10, 14 October 2008 diff hist +96 Royal Navy →1707–1914: Much of these transactions were done in secrecy so the information about this subject is not altogether clear. Distorted events taking place at Isaac Rice's Electric Boat Company.
