User contributions for Martin2000
Appearance
A user with 122 edits. Account created on 14 January 2005.
13 June 2005
- 15:0715:07, 13 June 2005 diff hist +1,328 Baháʼí Faith You are a bunch of Bahais who work in concert to abuse Wikipedia for your idiotic religious promotionalism. Go away. Reverting.
- 15:0515:05, 13 June 2005 diff hist −1,109 Baháʼu'lláh You are a Bahai and you clearly show that you are here to massage this article to suit your religious promotionalism. This article is about Bahaullah and his picture belongs right here. Reverting.
- 15:0215:02, 13 June 2005 diff hist +66 Baháʼu'lláh's family OK fine, but what is your excuse for deleting his picture from this article? His picture MOST DEFINITELY belongs to this article.
- 13:5213:52, 13 June 2005 diff hist +1,328 Baháʼí Faith In my absense the Bahai vermin have gradually converted this article back to a pathetic religious advertisement pamphlet. Reverting.
- 13:4713:47, 13 June 2005 diff hist −349 Baháʼu'lláh's family Why did you remove "concurrently" ? this whole article was create about the controversy surrounding his THREE CONCURRENT WIVES. What makes you think you can just remove "concurrently" from it?
- 13:4513:45, 13 June 2005 diff hist −1,108 Baháʼu'lláh I had no doubt whatsoever in my mind that in my absense the Bahais will little by little change this article back into was it was before my contributions: a pathetic religious advertisement pamphlet.
31 March 2005
- 02:1502:15, 31 March 2005 diff hist +13 Baháʼu'lláh's family someone had deleted "cuncurrently" from the sentence about his three wives -- it is important to point out they were concurrent.
- 02:1402:14, 31 March 2005 diff hist −466 Baháʼu'lláh picture belongs to top of the article consistent with Wikipedia standards and conventions.
27 March 2005
- 02:4702:47, 27 March 2005 diff hist +387 User talk:Martin2000 →Bahá'u'lláh
- 02:4402:44, 27 March 2005 diff hist +954 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive9 →[[User:Martin2000]]
- 01:3301:33, 27 March 2005 diff hist −478 Baháʼu'lláh Clearly you don't deserve to be and admin. There is NO EXCUSE for your constant attempts at trying to make this wikipedia article not conform to wikipedia standards and style. the pic belongs to top.
- 01:2801:28, 27 March 2005 diff hist +725 Talk:Baháʼu'lláh →A new solution to the picture conundrum
- 01:1001:10, 27 March 2005 diff hist −478 Baháʼu'lláh Consensus was never reached don't lie. Many people INCLUDING SOME ADMINS agreed that the picture belongs to top like other similar articles.
- 00:3800:38, 27 March 2005 diff hist −478 Baháʼu'lláh this is not a major change. this is just about the location of the pic and it has been discussed numerous times before. The pic belongs to top like other similar articles.
26 March 2005
- 15:1315:13, 26 March 2005 diff hist −478 Baháʼu'lláh You have been trying FOREVER to move the pic to bottom. this has been discussed many times. STOP waiting around and doing your own thing after a while. the pic belongs to top.
- 12:5812:58, 26 March 2005 diff hist +28 Universal House of Justice UHJ was a Shoghi concept and terminology. although i am sure that you are sure that Baha "must have discussed it somwhow"
- 12:5212:52, 26 March 2005 diff hist −478 Baháʼu'lláh photo belongs to the top of the article -- this has been discussed numerous times before and if you can't respect Wikipedia rules go away
10 March 2005
- 23:5223:52, 10 March 2005 diff hist +378 Talk:Baháʼí Faith →Unprotect the page
- 22:0522:05, 10 March 2005 diff hist +434 Talk:Baháʼí Faith →Unprotect the page
- 10:1410:14, 10 March 2005 diff hist −354 User talk:Martin2000 No edit summary
- 10:1210:12, 10 March 2005 diff hist +25 Baháʼí Faith OK, we'll keep your explanation, but Bahaism *IS* syncretic, so that part also stays in the introduction.
9 March 2005
- 07:5307:53, 9 March 2005 diff hist −170 User talk:Martin2000 No edit summary
- 06:0706:07, 9 March 2005 diff hist −775 Baháʼí Faith Wikipedia is not a Bahai publication to apply Bahai censorship to Wikipedia articles. And Wikipedia admins who support this sort of promotionalism should be ready to defend their favoritism.
8 March 2005
- 23:1723:17, 8 March 2005 diff hist −656 Baháʼí Faith Reverting -- Occamy's edit history and reverts clearly show that he is incapable of being objective and he is here to write Bahai religious promotional advertisements and not encyclopedia articles.
- 17:5217:52, 8 March 2005 diff hist −655 Baháʼí Faith Rv - No, it is not about publishing only. when Bahais are forbidden to even talk with excommunicated members (otherwise they risk the same fate), that is clearly a restriction of personal freedom.
- 14:4114:41, 8 March 2005 diff hist −655 Baháʼí Faith Reverting -- This article is not for Bahai organization's web site. This is a Wikipedia article. Please do not bring your Bahai "publishing restrictions and censorship" to Wikipedia.
- 00:0600:06, 8 March 2005 diff hist −335 Baháʼí Faith Reverting to last version by Tomhab -- Since this is an article about the Bahai Faith, the issue of Covenent Breaking and Excommunication is quite relevant and belongs right here.
- 00:0400:04, 8 March 2005 diff hist −2,409 User talk:Martin2000 No edit summary
7 March 2005
- 19:4219:42, 7 March 2005 diff hist +90 Baháʼí Faith OK, I changed "forbidden from association with" to "forbidden from speaking with". Why were you deleting the whole sentence instead of doing what I just did?
- 18:1018:10, 7 March 2005 diff hist −134 User talk:Martin2000 No edit summary
- 17:2917:29, 7 March 2005 diff hist −1,851 User talk:Martin2000 No edit summary
- 17:1517:15, 7 March 2005 diff hist +259 Baháʼí Faith Restoring correct and relevant information that was deleted by Bahais who plan to shape the article to look like a Bahai website article instead of a Wikipedia article
- 17:0817:08, 7 March 2005 diff hist −1,985 User talk:Martin2000 No edit summary
5 March 2005
- 02:2102:21, 5 March 2005 diff hist +321 Talk:Baháʼu'lláh →passport.
- 02:1102:11, 5 March 2005 diff hist +63 Baháʼu'lláh Reverting Bahai cheats and deceptions. Browne's mention of "exile" is about Ottoman government having sent him to Bahji not about Persian government having sent him to exile. You knew this damn well.
- 02:0302:03, 5 March 2005 diff hist +147 Baháʼu'lláh No edit summary
1 March 2005
- 07:2707:27, 1 March 2005 diff hist +1 Universal House of Justice UHJ was a Shoghi "reform" didn't come from Baha
- 06:4106:41, 1 March 2005 diff hist +19 Baháʼu'lláh →Revelation in the Síyáh-Chál
- 06:0806:08, 1 March 2005 diff hist +181 Baháʼí Faith Reverting -- Nobody said excommunication itself is restriction, it says even association with excommunicated people can result in excommunication, and that is both a threat and a restriction.
- 06:0406:04, 1 March 2005 diff hist +752 Baháʼu'lláh Reverting -- Nothing was "edited" or "edited out" as you seem to suggest. Just some new AND CORRECT information was added to the article and you have no right to deprive the article from those.
28 February 2005
- 22:1522:15, 28 February 2005 diff hist +1,707 Talk:Ray, Iran No edit summary
- 07:1807:18, 28 February 2005 diff hist +4 Talk:Ray, Iran No edit summary
- 06:5206:52, 28 February 2005 diff hist +1,570 Talk:Ray, Iran No edit summary
- 02:4402:44, 28 February 2005 diff hist +983 Baháʼu'lláh official "bahai references" are best evidences to counter bahai claims! the bahai site has the full copy of the passport of bahaullah. it is a normal iranian passport and even mentions he can return
- 02:1602:16, 28 February 2005 diff hist +1,341 N Talk:Ray, Iran No edit summary
- 02:0502:05, 28 February 2005 diff hist +7 Ray, Iran reverting - see discussion page
- 01:5801:58, 28 February 2005 diff hist +983 Baháʼu'lláh Reverrting to last by Wjohnson -- Bahais seems to ask for sources in one part but want to include unsourced claims in another part. Make up your mind please.
- 01:4301:43, 28 February 2005 diff hist +7 Ray, Iran No edit summary
- 01:0701:07, 28 February 2005 diff hist +891 Baháʼu'lláh Adding helpful facts
27 February 2005
- 23:3623:36, 27 February 2005 diff hist +181 Baháʼí Faith Restrictions on personal freedom is not only about "publishing" as one Bahai had decietfully reworded that section