User contributions for Lrzw
A user with 9 edits. Account created on 24 October 2023.
16 March 2024
- 22:5722:57, 16 March 2024 diff hist +711 Talk:Elon Musk →Some of the sources in this article are ridiculously bad: new section Tag: New topic
10 December 2023
- 12:5312:53, 10 December 2023 diff hist +487 Neuralink Added USDA statement Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 12:2512:25, 10 December 2023 diff hist +10 Neuralink No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit
27 November 2023
- 06:1606:16, 27 November 2023 diff hist −380 X (social network) The two sources don't really support the claim. Tags: references removed Visual edit
25 November 2023
- 01:4901:49, 25 November 2023 diff hist +27 X (social network) Added disputed neutrality tag. The lead exclusively citates left-wing politicians, activists and NGOs. The leadership by Elon Musk of Twitter was generally favorable received among conservatives, so it gives you an incomplete picture if you only include the opinions of one side.
22 November 2023
- 02:5302:53, 22 November 2023 diff hist +302 Talk:Javier Milei →w h a r: Reply Tag: Reply
19 November 2023
- 23:5723:57, 19 November 2023 diff hist +245 Talk:Javier Milei →w h a r: Reply Tag: Reply
27 October 2023
- 05:3305:33, 27 October 2023 diff hist −934 Optimus (robot) Undid revision 1182098256 by QRep2020 (talk) Yes 'tech gossip', those tweets were written in a time, where even less was known about the product than it is today. Tags: Undo Reverted section blanking
24 October 2023
- 22:0722:07, 24 October 2023 diff hist −934 Optimus (robot) Removed 'Experts opinion' section. It suggest a sophisticated analysis which is not possible given the unfinished state of the project. The cited 'expert' tweets resemble tech gossip more than reliable sources, violating WP:RS and WP:NPOV. Tags: Reverted section blanking Visual edit
