User contributions for L'Origine du monde
A user with 2,587 edits. Account created on 16 August 2013.
6 March 2023
- 05:3205:32, 6 March 2023 diff hist +56 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: I have not seen a convincing explanation from you, and I think it rude of you to fail to provide an understandable explanation and claim sealioning while providing no proper explanation. Administrators make mistakes too.
- 05:0905:09, 6 March 2023 diff hist +31 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: and I think it rude of you to fail to provide an explanation and claim sealioning while providing no explanation.
- 05:0705:07, 6 March 2023 diff hist +145 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: :::::: I have not seen a convincing explanation from you, and I think it rude of you to fail to provide an explanation and claim sealioning.
- 04:4104:41, 6 March 2023 diff hist +128 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: ::::Cullen328 I don't understand you, and would be very grateful if you could explain properly your concern.
- 04:3404:34, 6 March 2023 diff hist +433 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023 2: ReplySealioning is not the right description for me asking for justification for accusing me of a COI, and you should know that. Why did you block me? Tag: Reply
- 04:2004:20, 6 March 2023 diff hist +33 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: :::Muboshgu what did I do wrong? There is no COI that I can see.
- 04:1804:18, 6 March 2023 diff hist +51 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: :::Muboshgu what did I do wrong?
- 03:5503:55, 6 March 2023 diff hist +10 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023
- 03:4703:47, 6 March 2023 diff hist +62 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: ::Cullen328 please explain the misconduct.
- 03:4403:44, 6 March 2023 diff hist +436 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023 2: Replyyes. I am not happy about your editing. If you suspect a COI there is a procedure to follow. I asked only for apologies for not following that procedure. Tag: Reply
- 03:3603:36, 6 March 2023 diff hist +1 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023
- 03:3503:35, 6 March 2023 diff hist +339 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: {{unblock|I do not think that others have the right to repeatedly and falsely accuse me of a a POV. If you think there is a POV problem please raise it on on my talk page, or in the relevant place. I have been editing this thing for 15 years, and I deserve support, not getting banned for complaining about an administrator misbehaving }
- 03:2703:27, 6 March 2023 diff hist +364 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023 2: ReplyI have only asked for one block, in direct response to a request for a block of me. Tag: Reply
- 03:2503:25, 6 March 2023 diff hist +12 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: he/her
- 03:2403:24, 6 March 2023 diff hist +464 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023 2: ReplyWhat exactly do you mean? Which editing, what refusal? I complained that an administrator was rude to me, and refused to make a formal complaint, or a polite request about my editing. Tag: Reply
- 03:1003:10, 6 March 2023 diff hist +563 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023 2: ReplyI made a complaint about an administrator who accused me of COI editing. Guidelines seem clear to me - COI editing means ask on talk page. The editor didn't do that but made unpleasant implications on a project-talk page. How is that disruptive? Which edit(s) does this ban refer to? Tag: Reply
- 03:0203:02, 6 March 2023 diff hist +920 User talk:L'Origine du monde {{unblock|An editor wrongly accused me of a COI. It is not true, it is a lie, fake, mot real, not me. If that editor wanted to make the accusation properly, there is a procedure to follow which he/her did not. I don't need to drop the stick when I am fighting false accusations that are not being made in the right way }} Tag: New topic
- 02:4502:45, 6 March 2023 diff hist +479 User talk:L'Origine du monde →March 2023: {{unblock|reason=I should not be banned for protesting that an administrator wrongly accused me of a COI on Art and Language. I should be able to protest false accusations without being blocked. ~~~~}}
- 02:3202:32, 6 March 2023 diff hist +877 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Admin User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial or make a formal complaint. I think that he/she should be more polite, and would welcome assistance explaining this to him/her. I have tried to discuss with him/her on Art and Language talk page, and his/her talk page but he/she insults me rather than answering me. Surely there is a way to stop false accusations of COIs from Admin? I am not happy with the previous discussion. It se
- 02:2802:28, 6 March 2023 diff hist +1,024 Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard →Admin User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial or make a formal complaint. I think that he/she should be more polite, and would welcome assistance explaining this to him/her. I have tried to discuss with him/her on Art and Language talk page, and his/her talk page but he/she insults me rather than answering me. Surely there is a way to stop false accusations of COIs from Admin?: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
- 02:2202:22, 6 March 2023 diff hist +519 User talk:331dot/Archive 16 ==Help== So i have this editor, admin btw, who keeps accusing me , falsely, of having a COI in unconventional ways. You decided to stop the discussion, could you please ask him/her to stop making the false accusations, and report back to me.~~~~
- 02:0602:06, 6 March 2023 diff hist +68 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard I am strongly of the opinion that there should be penalties for administrators who choose to make repeated unfounded accusations of COIs in unconventional ways, refuse to apologise, and claim justification because other editors made similar accusations.'''[[User:L'Origine du monde|<span style="color:red; font-family:Edwardian Script ITC;font-size:15px; text-shadow: 0 0 .2">♥ L'Origine du mo
- 02:0402:04, 6 March 2023 diff hist +464 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard :I am strongly of the opinion that there should be penalties for administrators who choose to make repeated unfounded accusations of COIs in unconventional ways, and refuse to apologise.~~~~
- 01:4201:42, 6 March 2023 diff hist −7 Frieze Art Fair →Background
- 01:3401:34, 6 March 2023 diff hist +19 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard he/she should make a formal complaint in a special place. He/She hasn't even posted on my talk page.
- 01:3001:30, 6 March 2023 diff hist +164 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard As far as I can see first he/she should post on my talk page, then, if not happy, he/she should post in a special place. He/She hasn't even posted on my talk page.
- 01:2601:26, 6 March 2023 diff hist +502 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard 2023 (UTghtburst|Lightburst]] I want to move on. I told User:Star_Mississippi explicitly I had no COI, and straight away he/she accused me again of having a COI. What else can I do to stop lies being spread about me?~~~~
- 01:1901:19, 6 March 2023 diff hist +620 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard :'''Comment''' Star Mississippi has been rude to me. Above he/she justifies it as copying the other editors, but I think that as an admin who personally accused me of not understanding policy he/she should be required to follow the correct official policy. Claiming that he/she just joined in a group attack on me shouldn't work as an excuse.~~~~
- 01:1301:13, 6 March 2023 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial.
- 01:1101:11, 6 March 2023 diff hist +7 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial.
- 01:0801:08, 6 March 2023 diff hist +28 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial.
- 01:0401:04, 6 March 2023 diff hist +33 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial.
- 01:0001:00, 6 March 2023 diff hist +192 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard I would like to add that I do not understand your reference to my previous block, which followed a pretty unique set of circumstances. I think you deserve a month's block, to help you think.
- 00:5600:56, 6 March 2023 diff hist +26 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial.
- 00:5200:52, 6 March 2023 diff hist +141 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard ::I find it insulting when you repeatedly accuse me of COI editing, especially when your accusations take the place of explaining your edits.
- 00:3900:39, 6 March 2023 diff hist +61 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard You think you have behaved correctly ? Please provide any 'additional information' here, in public.
- 00:3200:32, 6 March 2023 diff hist +318 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard ::You think you have behaved correctly ? ~~~~
- 00:2800:28, 6 March 2023 diff hist +1,415 Talk:Art & Language →COI tag (March 2023)
- 00:2300:23, 6 March 2023 diff hist +27 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial.
- 00:2100:21, 6 March 2023 diff hist +319 Talk:Art & Language →COI tag (March 2023): :::User:Star Mississippi please reply.~~~~
- 00:1900:19, 6 March 2023 diff hist +108 Talk:Art & Language →COI tag (March 2023)
- 00:1400:14, 6 March 2023 diff hist +4 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard Admin User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial. I think that he/she should be more polite, and would welcome assistance explaining this to him/her. I have tried to discuss with him/her on Art and Language talk page, and his/her talk page but he/she insults me rather than answering me. Surely there is a way to stop false accusations of COIs from Admin?
- 00:1200:12, 6 March 2023 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial.
- 00:0500:05, 6 March 2023 diff hist +22 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial.
- 00:0400:04, 6 March 2023 diff hist +528 User talk:Star Mississippi {{User:SuggestBot/config |frequency = weekly }} {{User:MiszaBot/config |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |maxarchivesize = 100K |counter = 11 |minthreadsleft = 10 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 |algo = old(45d) |archive = User talk:Star Mississippi/Archive %(counter)d }} {| class="wikitable" |- style="background:light blue; color:black" |'''This page is automagically archived by a botservant.''' Really old archives are immediately below by year, month. 2010 and forward are in the box
- 00:0200:02, 6 March 2023 diff hist +806 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →User:Star_Mississippi repeatedly accuses me of a COI on Art and Language, and refuses to accept my denial.: new section Tag: New topic
5 March 2023
- 23:5523:55, 5 March 2023 diff hist +127 User talk:Star Mississippi →Insinuations of COI editing: I have clearly linked you to the relevant policy and you should reply here or on my talk page, rather than making further accusations on the article talk page.
- 23:5323:53, 5 March 2023 diff hist +462 User talk:Star Mississippi →Insinuations of COI editing: . I am pretty f*cking sure that if you ask me if I am COI editing and I say I am not have to either accept my reply or make a formal complaint. As far as I can see you are just being rude and unpleasant, refusing to answer my questions on Art and Language talk page, after distorting my reply. Generally I have a very bad impression of you.
- 23:4323:43, 5 March 2023 diff hist +513 User talk:Star Mississippi →Insinuations of COI editing: ::You have been rude, and unpleasant, and owe me an apology. You do not have the right to repeatedly make vague accusations. I have clearly linked you to the relevant policy. Either apologise or report me you rude and unpleasant editor.~~~~
- 23:3823:38, 5 March 2023 diff hist +28 Talk:Art & Language →They are represented by the Lisson Gallery.: Official links are allowed.
