User contributions for KabukiStarship

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

18:51, 9 June 2020 Acroterion talk contribs changed block settings for KabukiStarship talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: Noted other political rants at Talk:Men's rights movement‎ and Talk:Mulatto, clearly here with an agenda to "right great wrongs" and also taking into account the reasons for their first block)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:4918:49, 9 June 2020 diff hist +505‎ User talk:KabukiStarship ‎No edit summary
18:4518:45, 9 June 2020 diff hist +1,673‎ User talk:KabukiStarship ‎ I was LITERALLY Edit blocked and banned by Chines government officials.

04:3104:31, 19 April 2020 diff hist +755‎ Talk:Great Replacement ‎ →‎This Article is Far Left and the Series Converges
03:3503:35, 19 April 2020 diff hist +75‎ Talk:Great Replacement ‎ →‎This Article is Far Left and the Series Converges
03:3303:33, 19 April 2020 diff hist +14‎ Talk:Great Replacement ‎ →‎This Aricle is Far Left and the Series Converges
03:2903:29, 19 April 2020 diff hist +175‎ Talk:Great Replacement ‎ →‎This Aricle is Far Left and the Series Converges
03:1103:11, 19 April 2020 diff hist +2,890‎ Talk:Great Replacement ‎ Added rebuttal to Far right claim

22:3622:36, 11 January 2020 diff hist +610‎ Talk:Mulatto ‎ Added Incorrect Dictionary definition and labeling of word as racist

03:1703:17, 19 December 2019 diff hist +4,555‎ Talk:Men's rights movement ‎No edit summary

17:0217:02, 17 August 2019 diff hist +44‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
16:4516:45, 17 August 2019 diff hist +1,098‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
00:1800:18, 17 August 2019 diff hist +706‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary

23:4623:46, 16 August 2019 diff hist +115‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
23:4323:43, 16 August 2019 diff hist +1,258‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary

21:3521:35, 14 August 2019 diff hist +23‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
20:5920:59, 14 August 2019 diff hist +4,191‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary

18:0118:01, 13 August 2019 diff hist +2,008‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary

18:5818:58, 12 August 2019 diff hist +14‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
18:5718:57, 12 August 2019 diff hist +975‎ Talk:Associative array ‎ Found reference to prove my point. The primary literature is detailed set theory language with formal mathematical logic.
17:5917:59, 12 August 2019 diff hist −62‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
17:4617:46, 12 August 2019 diff hist +738‎ Talk:Associative array ‎ I found the compile error. It was blaring! I have bat senses for stuff like this.
16:4216:42, 12 August 2019 diff hist +102‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
16:4016:40, 12 August 2019 diff hist +477‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
16:3316:33, 12 August 2019 diff hist +400‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
16:0116:01, 12 August 2019 diff hist 0‎ Talk:Associative array ‎ I added the Subjective definition such that X-> and It is actually a unique-key.
15:5515:55, 12 August 2019 diff hist +1,229‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
07:2907:29, 12 August 2019 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
07:2607:26, 12 August 2019 diff hist +182‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
07:2207:22, 12 August 2019 diff hist −34‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
07:1507:15, 12 August 2019 diff hist −245‎ Talk:Associative array ‎ Wrong markdown format.
07:0807:08, 12 August 2019 diff hist +348‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
06:3806:38, 12 August 2019 diff hist +49‎ Talk:Associative array ‎No edit summary
06:3506:35, 12 August 2019 diff hist +3,110‎ Talk:Associative array ‎ The wiki is scientifically inaccurate due to claims that all maps are dictionaries and lack of formal math definition in the Universal language of math.

01:1301:13, 9 August 2019 diff hist +449‎ Associative array ‎ Undid revision 909984157 by 185.213.154.172 (talk) Clarified the missing association between Unique Strings, Unique keys, and Key-value tuples from my Discrete Structures CS 250 textbook. The article as previously was written had some huge holes in it big enough to fit a ship through. You can't just put up a definition in Wikipedia that is wrong on its face. C++ std lib calls it a map<Char,T>, not just a map. Tag: Visual edit

20:4520:45, 8 August 2019 diff hist −10‎ Associative array ‎ Binding is not a set theory terminology, the correct Set theory notation for the Abstract data type is Mapping.
20:3920:39, 8 August 2019 diff hist +170‎ Associative array ‎ Undid revision 909964057 by 185.213.154.172 (talk) The heading does summarize the body of research, a mapping is a "binding" but binding is not set theory langua. A collection is not an Abstract data type, nor is it a part of set theory, and thus can't be used to define an ADT required to be defined by set theory. Not all shapes are circles, likewise not all maps are dictionaries. C++ doesn't define what a map means. Tag: Undo
18:3218:32, 8 August 2019 diff hist +17‎ Associative array ‎ A string may be mapped to the empty set. The null object is not the empty set because it has an address of 0 while the empty set has no address. The null object is an abstraction that is not required for an assocaitive array as an Abstract data type. Tag: Visual edit
18:1118:11, 8 August 2019 diff hist +142‎ Associative array ‎ Undid revision 909947277 by Macrakis (talk) Definition must be defined by set theory. An Associative array is a TYPE of map but not all maps are Associative arrays. A function has to have an input in the domain and an output int he range with mappings from the codomain into the domain, & the empty set is member of both. The member of the codomain may be a member of another set called Values, but that is a defined by the map definition. Tag: Undo
16:3516:35, 8 August 2019 diff hist +143‎ Associative array ‎ An Abstract Data Type is defined very specifically as being defined by set theory and thus is required to be defined by set theory in wiki, and it's a Surjective map to be exact. A collection of key-value tuples may contain a duplicate key and thus is an Associative LIST and not an Assocaitaive ARRAY (Wiki List computer science). A map is not an Associative array, it's a MAP that may not be onto. The C++ people had some grandiose cooky reason for calling it map due to passing int as a string. Tag: Visual edit

17:2817:28, 2 August 2019 diff hist +27‎ Associative array ‎ Added language that refers to the set of unique strings a Keys and the set of Objects as Values. Tag: Visual edit
17:2517:25, 2 August 2019 diff hist +6‎ Associative array ‎ Clarified that an AA maps a SET of unique strings in the domain to INSTANCES of objects in the codomain. Tag: Visual edit
17:0517:05, 2 August 2019 diff hist +30‎ Associative array ‎ Added language detailing how the unique string is a member of the domain and the instance of the object is in the codomain. Tag: Visual edit

15:2915:29, 28 July 2019 diff hist +74‎ Associative array ‎ The C++ folks named their associative array Map because they abstracted away the hash table so it's not actually an associative array because it does more than just strings. An Associative array is defined as the mathematical definition of a map of unique strings to an instance of an object. Tag: Visual edit

9 June 2020

19 April 2020

11 January 2020

19 December 2019

17 August 2019

16 August 2019

14 August 2019

13 August 2019

12 August 2019

9 August 2019

8 August 2019

2 August 2019

28 July 2019