User contributions for Jannikp97
A user with 289 edits. Account created on 23 October 2022.
19 May 2024
- 13:4113:41, 19 May 2024 diff hist −184 Instant-runoff voting I am not sure this similar procedure actually exists (or is relevant here)
18 May 2024
- 07:0807:08, 18 May 2024 diff hist +526 Talk:Round-robin voting →Is This Page Original Research?: Reply Tag: Reply
17 May 2024
- 18:2018:20, 17 May 2024 diff hist −836 Score voting →Strategy: Does not seem relevant here
- 18:1818:18, 17 May 2024 diff hist −398 Score voting →Political use: Unsourced statement
- 18:1718:17, 17 May 2024 diff hist −210 Score voting Has maybe 10 hits on google with a substantial portion of them being from this article (or derivations)
- 18:1518:15, 17 May 2024 diff hist −1,231 STAR voting →Properties: Dont really think that these personal ``fights'' belong here.
- 18:0918:09, 17 May 2024 diff hist +47 Droop quota I am not too sure CPO-STV is a good example here (EAR is not the best either tbf)
- 05:5305:53, 17 May 2024 diff hist +309 Talk:Ranked pairs →The river method is not a variant of ranked pairs.: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 05:5205:52, 17 May 2024 diff hist −1 m Ranked pairs →Procedure
- 05:5105:51, 17 May 2024 diff hist −832 Ranked pairs The River variant is WP:OR, not published anywhere, I would not really mention it here unless it gets published somehwere
15 May 2024
- 19:5319:53, 15 May 2024 diff hist −1 m Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Descending solid coalitions No edit summary
- 19:5319:53, 15 May 2024 diff hist +270 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Descending solid coalitions →Descending solid coalitions: Reply Tag: Reply
13 May 2024
- 17:4817:48, 13 May 2024 diff hist −310 Ben Ferguson WP:BLPSPS
9 May 2024
- 20:3520:35, 9 May 2024 diff hist −131 Copeland's method →History: Dont think this is relevant enough
- 20:1820:18, 9 May 2024 diff hist −565 Rachel Brosnahan →Early life: WP:BLPSPS
- 20:1720:17, 9 May 2024 diff hist −515 Anthony Edwards (actor) →Early life: WP:BLPSPS
- 20:1620:16, 9 May 2024 diff hist −131 Anthony Edwards (actor) →Early life: WP:BLP
- 20:1520:15, 9 May 2024 diff hist −269 Shahnaz Husain WP:BLPSPS current
- 20:1320:13, 9 May 2024 diff hist −65 Angela Kinsey →Early years: WP:BLP
- 20:1320:13, 9 May 2024 diff hist −373 Angela Kinsey WP:BLPSPS
- 20:1020:10, 9 May 2024 diff hist −1,003 Karthik (actor) →Debut and success (1981–1986): WP:BLPSPS
- 20:0620:06, 9 May 2024 diff hist −30 Thierry Baudet Not a voting theorist
- 08:2408:24, 9 May 2024 diff hist +200 User talk:Affinepplan →May 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:3607:36, 9 May 2024 diff hist +198 Talk:Later-no-harm criterion →This article needs serious revision: Reply Tag: Reply
8 May 2024
- 17:4717:47, 8 May 2024 diff hist −1,286 Social utility efficiency →History: All of this is WP:OR/not very reliable sourcing current
- 17:4517:45, 8 May 2024 diff hist +3 m Sincere favorite criterion No edit summary
- 17:4517:45, 8 May 2024 diff hist −294 Sincere favorite criterion WP:SPS
- 17:4417:44, 8 May 2024 diff hist −933 Sincere favorite criterion →Compliant methods: WP:SPS
- 17:3217:32, 8 May 2024 diff hist −36 Condorcet winner criterion →Score voting: unfinished sentence
- 17:3117:31, 8 May 2024 diff hist −95 Condorcet winner criterion →Instant-runoff voting
- 17:3017:30, 8 May 2024 diff hist −491 Condorcet winner criterion →Instant-runoff voting: This is not a source I would trust on that statement
- 17:2917:29, 8 May 2024 diff hist −1,377 Condorcet winner criterion →Rated voting: Do not think any of this belongs here, further it is unsourced.
- 17:2817:28, 8 May 2024 diff hist +10 Condorcet winner criterion →By method
- 17:2817:28, 8 May 2024 diff hist −27 Condorcet winner criterion →Pass: If you include Ranked Pairs, then tournament solutions include weighted tournaments, which makes this statement obviously wrong.
- 17:2617:26, 8 May 2024 diff hist −821 Condorcet winner criterion →Stability (no-weak-spoilers): The only hit for this property is this article so WP:OR
- 17:2417:24, 8 May 2024 diff hist −2 Condorcet winner criterion →Stability (no-weak-spoilers)
- 17:2317:23, 8 May 2024 diff hist −164 Condorcet winner criterion That sentence does not seem right to me. Also technically Ranked Pairs is not a tournament solution.
7 May 2024
- 20:3320:33, 7 May 2024 diff hist −4 m Droop quota More standard term
6 May 2024
- 07:3807:38, 6 May 2024 diff hist +404 Talk:Sincere favorite criterion →Maybe Merge with Strategic Voting: new section Tag: New topic
4 May 2024
- 18:3318:33, 4 May 2024 diff hist −705 Rated voting →Variants: Sources not really relevant here current
- 16:0616:06, 4 May 2024 diff hist −2,136 Later-no-harm criterion Cleaned the intro of unsubstantiated claims Tag: Reverted
- 16:0016:00, 4 May 2024 diff hist +453 Talk:Later-no-harm criterion →This article needs serious revision: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5515:55, 4 May 2024 diff hist −26,779 Later-no-harm criterion →Examples: too many examples to not really relevant rules...
- 15:2815:28, 4 May 2024 diff hist +312 Talk:Rated voting →Real-world examples?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:1015:10, 4 May 2024 diff hist −1 m Phragmen's voting rules →Computation: spacing current
- 07:4007:40, 4 May 2024 diff hist +264 Talk:Rated voting →Renaming of Page: Reply Tag: Reply
- 07:3907:39, 4 May 2024 diff hist −750 Rated voting →Relationship to rankings: Both rangevoting.org and the electowiki are not good enough sources. They are self-published WP:SPS and especially the rangevoting site does not seem reliable. There being an Arxiv paper does not really change it WP:ARXIV, please discuss Talk:Rated voting if you want to revert again. Tag: Manual revert
3 May 2024
- 18:4618:46, 3 May 2024 diff hist −706 Rated voting →Relationship to rankings: Both original research WP:OR and WP:SPS Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 18:2418:24, 3 May 2024 diff hist −1,261 Instant-runoff voting →Tactical voting: I do not think these experiments are up to modern standard, it is quite unclear how and if they translate to any real world scenarios (especially since this paper also uses Impartial Culture)
- 18:2118:21, 3 May 2024 diff hist −386 Instant-runoff voting →Tactical voting: I don't think it appears in that article