User contributions for Fresiae
Appearance
Results for Fresiae talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 13 edits. Account created on 5 April 2019.
28 May 2019
- 10:4310:43, 28 May 2019 diff hist −3,127 User talk:Fresiae →Accusing editors of "defamation and slander" current Tag: Blanking
- 10:4310:43, 28 May 2019 diff hist −2,707 User talk:Fresiae →April 2019
20 May 2019
- 19:5619:56, 20 May 2019 diff hist +1,484 User talk:Fresiae →April 2019
11 May 2019
- 17:3017:30, 11 May 2019 diff hist +376 User talk:Fresiae →Accusing editors of "defamation and slander"
- 17:1917:19, 11 May 2019 diff hist −1,393 Forum for Democracy MrClog and I have had a discussion about the labeling of FvD as far-right. We agreed on a compromise that he would add a controversies section instead of labeling the party as far-right (and thereby using doubtful sources such as the report that was co-written by far-left terrorist Willem Wagenaar). I now see that this has not happened. I can only conclude that MrClog uses defamation and slander to put this party in a bad light, and is not actually interested in discussion about the topic. Tag: references removed
22 April 2019
- 20:2020:20, 22 April 2019 diff hist +1,290 User talk:MrClog →Labeling Forum for Democracy as far-right
- 18:4618:46, 22 April 2019 diff hist +2,116 User talk:MrClog →Labeling Forum for Democracy as far-right
- 18:1318:13, 22 April 2019 diff hist +1 User talk:MrClog →Labeling Forum for Democracy as far-right
- 18:0518:05, 22 April 2019 diff hist +794 User talk:MrClog →Labeling Forum for Democracy as far-right: new section
- 17:0817:08, 22 April 2019 diff hist −1,656 m Forum for Democracy Forum for Democracy is not a far-right party. The sources that say so aren't credible. The last report was written with the help of Willem Wagenaar, a far-left terrorist who was convicted for a terrorist attack on a Dutch political party in 1986. How is he a credible, neutral source? Al Jazeera isn't a credible source either, since they are payed by Qatar. All the other articles don't say why they call FvD far-right and/or are written by known left-wing political activists, like Kleinpaste. Tag: references removed
- 14:3314:33, 22 April 2019 diff hist −1,209 m Forum for Democracy Dutch media do not call Forum for Democracy far-right. They use terms like 'right-wing populism' instead. It would therefore be good if this is not done on Wikipedia either since it gives a wrong impression about Dutch politics in general, and Forum for Democracy in particular. Moreover, the distinction with real Dutch extreme right-wing organizations such as the Dutch Peoples Union becomes too unclear. Tag: references removed
7 April 2019
- 15:2915:29, 7 April 2019 diff hist −916 Forum for Democracy I think we should follow Dutch media when labeling Dutch political parties. At the moment, no single newspaper in the Netherlands calls Forum for Democracy far-right. Especially because the Dutch PVV is labeled as "right-wing" on Wikipedia. This would imply that Forum for Democracy is more extreme than the PVV, which is totally not the case. It is in fact the opposite. Tag: references removed
6 April 2019
- 09:5709:57, 6 April 2019 diff hist −872 Forum for Democracy Undid revision 891053516 by Locomokipkachelfant (talk) Tags: Undo references removed