User contributions for Eminent Jurist
Appearance
A user with 54 edits. Account created on 9 June 2016.
21 June 2016
- 08:4908:49, 21 June 2016 diff hist +731 User talk:Eminent Jurist Her explanation was an utter and complete lie
- 08:3708:37, 21 June 2016 diff hist +1,431 User talk:Eminent Jurist Reply
- 08:2508:25, 21 June 2016 diff hist 0 User talk:Eminent Jurist Unblock immediatey ; miscarriage of justice
- 08:2408:24, 21 June 2016 diff hist +578 User talk:Eminent Jurist Unblock
- 07:5807:58, 21 June 2016 diff hist +475 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →Please unprotect Thomas Pogge, there is a strong consensus on the talk page of a half dozen editors and 200 philosophers voting for inclusion of the well-sourced information
- 07:5307:53, 21 June 2016 diff hist +78 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Page protection: fix
- 07:5207:52, 21 June 2016 diff hist +579 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Page protection: we have the consensus
- 07:4607:46, 21 June 2016 diff hist +1,393 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →Please unprotect Thomas Pogge, there is a strong consensus on the talk page of a half dozen editors and 200 philosophers voting for inclusion of the well-sourced information: new section
- 07:4107:41, 21 June 2016 diff hist 0 Talk:Thomas Pogge Updated count
- 07:3807:38, 21 June 2016 diff hist +13 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Can David Pearce please srop editing this article?: we must fight back against this stalinist removal of content
- 07:3707:37, 21 June 2016 diff hist +652 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Can David Pearce please srop editing this article?: new section
- 07:3107:31, 21 June 2016 diff hist +285 User talk:SlimVirgin →Misconduct: more info
- 07:2807:28, 21 June 2016 diff hist +363 User talk:SlimVirgin →Misconduct: must be nice to count yourself as 3 votes!
- 07:2207:22, 21 June 2016 diff hist +271 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Controversy text proposals: vote yes. This is so obviously notable one can onlyconclude those who vote nay have not read the sources
- 07:1907:19, 21 June 2016 diff hist +1,003 Talk:Thomas Pogge Rebuttal to astonishngly dishonest reply →Page protection
- 07:1107:11, 21 June 2016 diff hist +17 User talk:SlimVirgin →Misconduct
- 07:1007:10, 21 June 2016 diff hist +906 User talk:SlimVirgin →Misconduct: new section
- 07:0507:05, 21 June 2016 diff hist +387 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Page protection: i just cannot get over how absurd and indefensible your position is
- 06:5706:57, 21 June 2016 diff hist +1,159 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Page protection: you abused your powers and your poisition is unsupportable and laughable
- 06:5106:51, 21 June 2016 diff hist +407 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Page protection: addendum
- 06:4606:46, 21 June 2016 diff hist +131 Talk:Thomas Pogge →This is an outrageous abuse of your administrative powers: please note i've given you the sources themselves.you people should be ashamed of your own misconduct
- 06:4306:43, 21 June 2016 diff hist +503 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Page protection: disgraceful
- 06:4106:41, 21 June 2016 diff hist +2,079 Talk:Thomas Pogge →This is an outrageous abuse of your administrative powers: new section
- 06:2606:26, 21 June 2016 diff hist +2,078 Thomas Pogge How many references does his royal highness desire? Just added another for you. I have 100 more Undid revision 726283802 by Davidcpearce (talk)
- 06:2406:24, 21 June 2016 diff hist +2,000 Thomas Pogge Adding the primary source for our friend who cannot read. Is the chronicle not adequate for his majesty? You are making a fool of yourself Undid revision 726283501 by Davidcpearce (talk)
- 06:2106:21, 21 June 2016 diff hist +296 User talk:Eminent Jurist Stop
- 06:1906:19, 21 June 2016 diff hist +1,648 Thomas Pogge More references for my friend who is incapable of speech. I suggest you cease your own misconduct Undid revision 726282809 by Davidcpearce (talk)
- 06:1406:14, 21 June 2016 diff hist +203 Talk:Thomas Pogge →Discussion: of course the chronicle is reputable
- 06:1106:11, 21 June 2016 diff hist +1,419 Thomas Pogge These are excellent sources. Don't be absurd
- 06:0806:08, 21 June 2016 diff hist +955 Thomas Pogge That's your fifth revert. Stop immediately. Undid revision 726282286 by Davidcpearce (talk)
- 06:0606:06, 21 June 2016 diff hist +955 Thomas Pogge It's now your fourth reversion. please stop edit warring. There is no reason to be removing this. "See below" oh where you give no reasons?Undid revision 726281686 by Davidcpearce (talk)
- 05:5705:57, 21 June 2016 diff hist +955 Thomas Pogge Please don't be obtuse. Of course this should be added. Feel free to pen a section on controverises involving his work as well. Undid revision 725706156 by Davidcpearce (talk)
9 June 2016
- 22:4122:41, 9 June 2016 diff hist +175 Talk:Trump University Not so fast! Undid revision 724541438 by Zzuuzz (talk)
- 22:3922:39, 9 June 2016 diff hist +186 Talk:Trump University Forum!11
- 22:3622:36, 9 June 2016 diff hist −6 Talk:Trump University Forum
- 22:3622:36, 9 June 2016 diff hist +142 Talk:Trump University (edit summary removed)
- 22:3422:34, 9 June 2016 diff hist +142 Talk:Trump University →Madoff: new section
- 22:3222:32, 9 June 2016 diff hist +134 Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism Jerk
- 22:3122:31, 9 June 2016 diff hist +319 User talk:Toddst1 Victory will soon be mine!Undid revision 724538487 by Toddst1 (talk)
- 22:3022:30, 9 June 2016 diff hist +250 Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism Go learn about figurative speech, pleb
- 22:2722:27, 9 June 2016 diff hist −698 Talk:Trump University (edit summary removed)
- 22:2522:25, 9 June 2016 diff hist +269 Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism →User-reported: new report for Toddst
- 22:2222:22, 9 June 2016 diff hist −587 Talk:Trump University I will bury you. Undid revision 724538898 by Toddst1 (talk)
- 22:2122:21, 9 June 2016 diff hist −111 Talk:Trump University Cease your edit warring at once, vandal! You are up to 9RRUndid revision 724539175 by Toddst1 (talk)
- 22:1922:19, 9 June 2016 diff hist −148 Talk:Trump University Undid hit and run by Todd, the vandal evision 724524063 by Toddst1 (talk)
- 22:1822:18, 9 June 2016 diff hist +37 Talk:Trump University Undid revision 724525049 by Toddst1 (talk)
- 22:1822:18, 9 June 2016 diff hist −116 Talk:Trump University Undid the work of notorious Vandal Toddst. revision 724525298 by Toddst1 (talk)
- 22:1722:17, 9 June 2016 diff hist −471 Talk:Trump University Undid revision 724526342 by Toddst1 (talk)
- 22:1322:13, 9 June 2016 diff hist +319 User talk:Toddst1 →The next time you unlawfully remove talk page comments I wll have you banned from the project and a Scarlet letter placed upon your forehead, friend: new section
- 12:5412:54, 9 June 2016 diff hist +525 Talk:Trump University →General Bias: Evidence against Trump stronger than against Madoff