User contributions for DoctorNeutralNoBias
A user with 30 edits. Account created on 28 May 2010.
31 May 2010
- 11:4711:47, 31 May 2010 diff hist −1,518 User talk:DoctorNeutralNoBias No edit summary current
- 11:4311:43, 31 May 2010 diff hist +282 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Revert. Reference is to evidence cited by the organisation causing them to make their claim. It as relevant as the existing reference. Tag: repeating characters
30 May 2010
- 17:3417:34, 30 May 2010 diff hist +364 Talk:911: In Plane Site →Removal of links
- 17:1217:12, 30 May 2010 diff hist +146 User talk:Arthur Rubin →911 - In Plane Site
- 17:0717:07, 30 May 2010 diff hist +1,046 User talk:Arthur Rubin →911 - In Plane Site
- 16:4816:48, 30 May 2010 diff hist +282 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Reference added Tag: repeating characters
- 16:1816:18, 30 May 2010 diff hist +5 911: In Plane Site Sentence read as if to indicate the 911 Truth Movement reject some claims. Its only a minority of individuals.
- 16:1416:14, 30 May 2010 diff hist −2 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: Sentence read as if the article was judging the claim to be a clear hoax. Changed to make it clear this is the view of those making the criticism.
- 15:5615:56, 30 May 2010 diff hist +54 911: In Plane Site →Claims: Revert to more accurately describe content of the film. Please view the film before editing elements of the article that refer to its content.
- 12:3412:34, 30 May 2010 diff hist +42 911: In Plane Site →Claims: Questions about conspiracy theories are not asked. Describing the evidence as "selected" is not as neutral viewpoint.
- 12:2412:24, 30 May 2010 diff hist +6 911: In Plane Site No edit summary
- 11:4711:47, 30 May 2010 diff hist −16 Loose Change →Criticism: 911Research.WTC7.net in not the 911 Truth Movement. Describing an article that contains elements criticism '''and support''' as "speaking out about" is biased. Tag: references removed
- 02:2402:24, 30 May 2010 diff hist −145 Talk:Loose Change →Criticism sources
- 02:1802:18, 30 May 2010 diff hist +200 Talk:Loose Change →Criticism sources
- 02:1602:16, 30 May 2010 diff hist −21 Loose Change →Criticism: Reference was not to 911 Truth Movement. Reference was actually to an article that supports most of the content of the film. Tag: references removed
29 May 2010
- 20:1120:11, 29 May 2010 diff hist −11 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: removed clear hoax again. No one has ever described the dicussion of possible extra hardware as a hoax. How can a discussion or claim be a hoax itself?
- 20:0120:01, 29 May 2010 diff hist +1,393 User talk:Arthur Rubin →911 - In Plane Site
- 18:3318:33, 29 May 2010 diff hist −24 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: In Plane Site does not refer to a hole on the 2nd floor. It does the exact opposite.
- 18:3218:32, 29 May 2010 diff hist −6 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: This has never been demonstrated.
- 18:2918:29, 29 May 2010 diff hist +202 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: Added references to the film website to understanding of what it being discussed.
- 18:2418:24, 29 May 2010 diff hist +57 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: Added reference claimed evidence mentioned in the article
- 12:1112:11, 29 May 2010 diff hist +23 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: The film does not claim that missiles were fired into the buildings.
- 12:0912:09, 29 May 2010 diff hist +12 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: The films does not suggest that the plane was defintitely a military plane. It suggests that it was a possibility.
- 12:0712:07, 29 May 2010 diff hist +38 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: The film does not make a claim about the size of the hole. It talks about the photos indicating the size of the hole and asks the viewer to decide what this means.
- 11:5911:59, 29 May 2010 diff hist +3 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: Removed the words "clear hoax" - this is based opinion.
- 11:5711:57, 29 May 2010 diff hist −129 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: The film does not claim that a hole was made in the second floor. Removed as factually incorrect.
- 11:4911:49, 29 May 2010 diff hist +1,007 User talk:Arthur Rubin →911 - In Plane Site: new section
28 May 2010
- 09:4809:48, 28 May 2010 diff hist +38 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: Reference link correction! Tag: repeating characters
- 09:4609:46, 28 May 2010 diff hist +60 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: Punctuation and layout corrections.
- 09:4209:42, 28 May 2010 diff hist +875 911: In Plane Site →Criticism of claims: The article incorrectly reported statements and the content of the film. After examining the film, this has been ammended to be more accurate.
