User contributions for Derek.cashman

7 July 2010

• 19:0619:06, 7 July 2010 diff hist −1,501 m User talk:Derek.cashman deleting Discount Tire Company deletion notification. Retired editor. Do not care. Thanks and Good-Bye.

29 January 2010

• 17:2017:20, 29 January 2010 diff hist −91 m User:Derek.cashman/photouserbox rm cat current
• 17:1817:18, 29 January 2010 diff hist −46 m User:Derek.cashman/Edited pages →Lists: cleanup current
• 17:1717:17, 29 January 2010 diff hist −161 m User:Derek.cashman retired
• 17:1617:16, 29 January 2010 diff hist −1,075 m User talk:Derek.cashman retired

14 December 2009

• 19:4519:45, 14 December 2009 diff hist −148 m User talk:Derek.cashman cleanup
• 19:4219:42, 14 December 2009 diff hist −451 m User:Derek.cashman rm
• 19:3919:39, 14 December 2009 diff hist −45 m User:Derek.cashman e
• 19:3619:36, 14 December 2009 diff hist −48 m Talk:Criticism of Walmart rm tag
• 19:3519:35, 14 December 2009 diff hist −48 m Talk:Walmart rm tag
• 19:3519:35, 14 December 2009 diff hist −47 m Talk:Google rm 'maintained' tag (no longer actively involved in maintaining it)
• 19:3319:33, 14 December 2009 diff hist −2,335 m User:Derek.cashman editing
• 19:2719:27, 14 December 2009 diff hist −47 m User talk:Derek.cashman semi-retired
• 19:2619:26, 14 December 2009 diff hist +2,791 m User talk:Derek.cashman/Archive 7 archiving talk page
• 19:2619:26, 14 December 2009 diff hist −2,791 m User talk:Derek.cashman archiving
• 19:2219:22, 14 December 2009 diff hist −205 m Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Mentors →List of mentors: rm
• 19:1319:13, 14 December 2009 diff hist 0 m EPIC 2014 put citation after punctuation, not before
• 19:1319:13, 14 December 2009 diff hist −18 m EPIC 2014 rm red link
• 19:0719:07, 14 December 2009 diff hist −521 m User:Derek.cashman/Edited pages rm 'current projects'
• 19:0619:06, 14 December 2009 diff hist −15 m User:Derek.cashman rm email box
• 19:0619:06, 14 December 2009 diff hist −34 m User:Derek.cashman editing
• 19:0519:05, 14 December 2009 diff hist −370 m User:Derek.cashman editing
• 19:0419:04, 14 December 2009 diff hist −269 m Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/participants rm; not really active here anymore.
• 19:0319:03, 14 December 2009 diff hist −110 m Wikipedia:WikiProject Virginia/Members →Active members: rm; not really active here anymore
• 19:0219:02, 14 December 2009 diff hist −367 m Wikipedia:Peer review/Volunteers rm; not really active here anymore.
• 16:5116:51, 14 December 2009 diff hist +669 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities →Subcategorization

11 December 2009

• 17:5317:53, 11 December 2009 diff hist +670 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pharmacology →Should Cold-fX article be included in the project?
• 17:4417:44, 11 December 2009 diff hist +394 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities →Top importance restricted to capitals: interesting case for NYC?
• 17:3517:35, 11 December 2009 diff hist +1,039 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities →Let's toss all ratings: no, don't "toss all ratings"; but here's an idea
• 17:2617:26, 11 December 2009 diff hist +546 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Assessment →Slight tweak to Top-priority: better example
• 17:2217:22, 11 December 2009 diff hist +240 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Assessment →Top-importance and the multiple capitals of South Africa
• 15:4115:41, 11 December 2009 diff hist +257 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Assessment →Slight tweak to Top-priority: note on riyadh
• 15:3915:39, 11 December 2009 diff hist +97 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Assessment →Top-importance and the multiple capitals of South Africa
• 15:3915:39, 11 December 2009 diff hist +225 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Assessment →Top-importance and the multiple capitals of South Africa: wtf?

10 December 2009

• 22:3422:34, 10 December 2009 diff hist +384 m Talk:Pittsburgh →montage image in infobox: ok
• 22:3022:30, 10 December 2009 diff hist +25 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Assessment →Top-importance and the multiple capitals of South Africa
• 22:2922:29, 10 December 2009 diff hist +140 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Assessment →Top-importance and the multiple capitals of South Africa: reverted
• 22:2822:28, 10 December 2009 diff hist +575 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities →Importance ratings: another point
• 22:2522:25, 10 December 2009 diff hist −30 Talk:Cape Town Revert to revision 330920937 dated 2009-12-10 19:47:55 by Derek.cashman using popups
• 22:2222:22, 10 December 2009 diff hist +1,116 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities →Importance ratings
• 22:1422:14, 10 December 2009 diff hist +509 m User talk:Purplebackpack89 →WPCities criteria: no, you're the one that's out of line.
• 20:0720:07, 10 December 2009 diff hist +193 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities →Importance ratings: reverted
• 20:0520:05, 10 December 2009 diff hist +401 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities →Importance ratings: still opposed
• 20:0320:03, 10 December 2009 diff hist +670 m User talk:Purplebackpack89 →WPCities criteria: rejected and reverted
• 20:0220:02, 10 December 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:Melekeok (town) reassessment of high-importance for WP:CITIES per established guidelines. The article is not a national capital, which is required for top-importance.
• 19:5619:56, 10 December 2009 diff hist +184 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Assessment →Slight tweak to Top-priority: reversion complete
• 19:5419:54, 10 December 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:Sydney reassessment of high-importance for WP:CITIES per established guidelines. The article is not a national capital, which is required for top-importance.
• 19:5419:54, 10 December 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:Shanghai reassessment of high-importance for WP:CITIES per established guidelines. The article is not a national capital, which is required for top-importance.
• 19:5419:54, 10 December 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:São Paulo reassessment of high-importance for WP:CITIES per established guidelines. The article is not a national capital, which is required for top-importance.
• 19:5319:53, 10 December 2009 diff hist +1 m Talk:Saint Petersburg reassessment of high-importance for WP:CITIES per established guidelines. The article is not a national capital, which is required for top-importance.