User contributions for Databoose43
A user with 76 edits. Account created on 19 October 2023.
1 May 2024
- 22:3722:37, 1 May 2024 diff hist +302 Cannabidiol US federal drug scheduling has absolutely nothing to do with whether a compound has no medical use. its pharmacological properties do, and law does not magically change the pharmacological properies of a compound. Tags: Undo Disambiguation links added
2 April 2024
- 09:2809:28, 2 April 2024 diff hist −444 Ginseng The citations within this very claim directly contradicts the statement of ginseng having no biological activity in humans, infact the medline plus articles within the two citations noted for the claim (seem to?) speculate on multiple possible medical effects (the substantiative evidence, i am not sure), however we do know for certain that gingseng certainly does have biological effects in humans. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107391 Tag: Visual edit
25 March 2024
- 07:4707:47, 25 March 2024 diff hist +220 User talk:Databoose43 →March 2024: Reply current Tag: Reply
24 March 2024
- 20:4920:49, 24 March 2024 diff hist +1,521 User talk:Databoose43 →March 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:4719:47, 24 March 2024 diff hist +2,656 User talk:Databoose43 →March 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5215:52, 24 March 2024 diff hist +147 Talk:Theanine →Theanine is an extract, not a drug: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5015:50, 24 March 2024 diff hist +1,077 Talk:Theanine →Theanine is an extract, not a drug: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:3915:39, 24 March 2024 diff hist +743 Talk:Theanine →Theanine is an extract, not a drug: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:3015:30, 24 March 2024 diff hist +679 User talk:Zefr →Warning : This user is actively participating in page griefing.: new section Tags: Reverted New topic
- 15:2215:22, 24 March 2024 diff hist +600 User talk:Databoose43 →March 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:1315:13, 24 March 2024 diff hist +740 User talk:Databoose43 →March 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:2514:25, 24 March 2024 diff hist +135 User talk:Kimen8 →A cup of tea for you!: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
- 14:2414:24, 24 March 2024 diff hist +848 User talk:Kimen8 →A cup of tea for you!: new WikiLove message Tags: Reverted wikilove
- 14:1714:17, 24 March 2024 diff hist +933 Talk:Theanine →EFSA scientific opinion: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0414:04, 24 March 2024 diff hist −964 m Cannabidiol Removed my unnessecary double-cite, and also some (albeit) substantiated conjecture from myself. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:5813:58, 24 March 2024 diff hist +584 Cannabidiol 1. Many things about cannabinidiol's pharmacodynamics are understood, calling it an "early stage of research" is misleading, 2. currently there is no evidence (that i could find) of CBD being a direct antagonist to CB1/CB2, and additionally i could only find literuatre backing that it is a negative allosteric modulator for CB1, but not for CB2. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:4013:40, 24 March 2024 diff hist +262 Talk:Theanine →EFSA scientific opinion: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:3813:38, 24 March 2024 diff hist +3 Cannabidiol Undid revision 1215330178 by Bon courage (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 13:3213:32, 24 March 2024 diff hist +3 Cannabidiol Undoing zafir's grief, user is notorious for vandalizing pages, will continue undoing. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 13:2913:29, 24 March 2024 diff hist +727 Talk:Theanine →EFSA scientific opinion: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1513:15, 24 March 2024 diff hist +25 Theanine Undid greif by Zafir, user is notorious for going on wiki pages regarding compounds with various pharmacological effects, paper removed was a scientific review into theanine's, very real, and very legitimate pharmacological properties that can (but don't nessecarily) have any health benefits. Stop griefing pharma pages, you are clearly uneducated on this topic. Tags: Undo Reverted
20 March 2024
- 18:3718:37, 20 March 2024 diff hist −39 Talk:Quetiapine →Problem with one of the papers referenced in regards to quetiapine's antihistamanergic activitiy.
- 18:2118:21, 20 March 2024 diff hist +43 Talk:Quetiapine →Problem with one of the papers referenced in regards to quetiapine's antihistamanergic activitiy.
- 18:1718:17, 20 March 2024 diff hist +41 Talk:Quetiapine →Problem with one of the papers referenced in regards to quetiapine's antihistamanergic activitiy.
- 18:1618:16, 20 March 2024 diff hist +33 Talk:Quetiapine →Question about quetiapine's antagonism on Histamine 1 Receptors.
- 18:1218:12, 20 March 2024 diff hist −26 Quetiapine In the abstract oof the reference for the paper i had removed, it claimed that Clozapine had antihistamanergic activity, which is a seperate drug from quetaipine. Secondly, in the full paper, quetiapine was not used whatsoever to determine histamine 1 blockade, within the paper the drug Astemizole was being used, which is completely different from quetiapine, i believe this reference should be removed, i have made a talk post if anyone wants to chime in on this. Tag: Visual edit
- 18:0518:05, 20 March 2024 diff hist +1,493 Talk:Quetiapine →Question about quetiapine's antagonism on Histamine 1 Receptors.: new section Tag: New topic
- 17:4217:42, 20 March 2024 diff hist +232 Talk:Quetiapine →Quetiapine and Anxiety: Reply Tag: Reply
5 March 2024
- 04:3304:33, 5 March 2024 diff hist −497 Sigma male Removed claim and citation based off of an opinion piece blog post, preferably i think citations in this situation should be direct examples of people who use the said meme/slang and how they are used instead of a person's interpretation of it who does not participate in using the meme/slang. I think it opens a can of worms in terms of people misunderstanding/misrepresenting the idea. Tag: Visual edit
29 February 2024
- 04:4004:40, 29 February 2024 diff hist +475 Talk:Self-immolation of Aaron Bushnell →He was not protesting the "Israel-Hamas war": Reply Tag: Reply
17 February 2024
- 09:4509:45, 17 February 2024 diff hist +816 Talk:Cannabidiol →Discussing CBD receptors: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:0508:05, 17 February 2024 diff hist +2 m Cannabidiol Minor clarification. Tag: Visual edit
- 07:4007:40, 17 February 2024 diff hist −100 m Cannabidiol Wanted to simplify by just referencing the most universally understood example of a CB1 agonist instead, while CBD's noncompetitive antagonism may mitigate the psychoactive effects of every CB1 agonist universally in a dose dependant manner, it is more simple to just use the example of THC as that is one of its main pharmacological mechanisms of action. Tag: Visual edit
- 07:3007:30, 17 February 2024 diff hist +1,840 Talk:Cannabidiol →Discussing CBD receptors: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:5206:52, 17 February 2024 diff hist +730 Talk:Cannabidiol →Discussing CBD receptors: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:3506:35, 17 February 2024 diff hist +4,777 Cannabidiol Undid revision 1207179178 by Zefr (talk) , refer to previous undo's, reverting user grief edits, will continue doing this. Tags: Undo Reverted
16 February 2024
- 05:5305:53, 16 February 2024 diff hist +186 User talk:Databoose43 →February 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
14 February 2024
- 04:5204:52, 14 February 2024 diff hist +290 User talk:Databoose43 →February 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 04:4804:48, 14 February 2024 diff hist +185 Talk:Cannabidiol →Pharmacology section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 04:4604:46, 14 February 2024 diff hist +4,777 Cannabidiol Undoing grief edits in the meatime as moderation deals with these users. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 04:4404:44, 14 February 2024 diff hist +225 User talk:Databoose43 →February 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 04:4004:40, 14 February 2024 diff hist +4,777 Cannabidiol Reason was already given as to why the user is greifing the page, your responsibility to do the work into looking into the edits, reported your account. Stop greifing. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 04:1304:13, 14 February 2024 diff hist +868 User talk:Databoose43 →February 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 04:0204:02, 14 February 2024 diff hist +4,777 Cannabidiol Undid revision 1206639473 by Zefr (talk) , reason stated within talk page, this wiki page is not exclusive to epidiolex as a brand name solution of CBD and its purpose for epilepsy, this is the page for the general compound of CBD. Stop griefing the page. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 03:5903:59, 14 February 2024 diff hist +1,331 Talk:Cannabidiol →Pharmacology section: Reply Tag: Reply
12 February 2024
- 04:5804:58, 12 February 2024 diff hist −127 m Cannabidiol Wanted to remove this part as i could find no high quality evidence that CBD also acts as an (albeit very weak) direct antagonist to CB1, i could only find sufficient evidence of it being a negative allosteric modulator of CB1, however if someone finds good evidence of direct CB1 antagonism in regards to CBD, then feel free to revert this commit and chime in. Tag: Visual edit
11 February 2024
- 07:0207:02, 11 February 2024 diff hist −269 m Cannabidiol Wanted to shorten the edit and make it more brief. Tag: Visual edit
- 06:5406:54, 11 February 2024 diff hist +2,483 Cannabidiol Undid revision 1205635959 by Zefr (talk) , we had a long winded discussion within the talk page and none of what he had said was a convincing argument that any of my edits were factually incorrect or inaccurate, the jist of the talk discussion was "since we don't know about how CBD works for seizures, we know next to nothing else about the mechanism of CBD, if the user keeps greifing my wiki edits, i will have to report this user. Tag: Undo
- 06:5106:51, 11 February 2024 diff hist −2,483 Cannabidiol (wanted to change the summary, ignore this) Tag: Undo
- 06:4906:49, 11 February 2024 diff hist +2,483 Cannabidiol Undid revision 1205635959 by Zefr (talk) , we had a long winded discussion within the talk page and none of what he had said was a convincing argument that any of my edits were factually incorrect or inaccurate, the jist of the talk discussion was "since we don't know about how CBD works for seizures, we know next to nothing else about the mechanism of CBD" Tags: Undo Reverted