User contributions for Cleaghyre

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

16:31, 22 September 2011 Future Perfect at Sunrise talk contribs blocked Cleaghyre talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (permanent nationalist edit-warring, likely sock of User:Serafin)

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

15:1015:10, 22 September 2011 diff hist +27‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ English you can improve. Removing edition is offensive. You still did not read the article where Dzierzon statements are etc. You do not know facts from history but accuse me for POV.

17:4717:47, 21 September 2011 diff hist +27‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ So "correctly", and I am supprised you call it "my unsourced opinion" but I see you even did not read the article. I read most of publication by Dzierzon and about Dzierzon. I also check orginals in University collection of rare and old books.

18:4718:47, 20 September 2011 diff hist +8‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ OK. But it is no argument to remove the point. You know better English, for sure you know what is my goal thus make better expression. It is time the Polish name will be returned in world literature to Polish patriot and Polish scientist.
16:0916:09, 20 September 2011 diff hist +8‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ Kotinski!! AS USUSALY YOU STAT EDITING WAR AND NO ARGUMENTS, FACTS OR DISCUSSION. It will not work read article give contrarguments. All inside text confirm I am right. If you ignore historical facts you should stay away from Wikipedia.

17:3617:36, 19 September 2011 diff hist +8‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ Makes perfect sense, read whom Dzierzon consider himself, Johann is not Polish, parents did not speak German so call him Jan, Germans forcibly change baptist name to German forms. Since you are no Pole for you all it has no sense.
00:5900:59, 19 September 2011 diff hist +8‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎No edit summary

17:4917:49, 10 September 2011 diff hist 0‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ He is Pole and Polish name is most important

14:1214:12, 2 September 2011 diff hist +13‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ Kotniski !!! you started editor war. You ignore my notice to you, you ignore historical arguments and doing you edits just to satisfy you ego. Stop it!!!

18:4018:40, 31 August 2011 diff hist +13‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ I think taking for consideration you revisionism and rooting old nationalistic German politic views you will be blocked first. I am not going to accept result of Kulturkampf on history of most revered Polish beekeeper. Start you arguments if you can
16:1716:17, 31 August 2011 diff hist +13‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ Consensus was never reached, and the discussion was about article title. Beside you start editor war in defence of Kulturkampf and you idol action Bismarck. Wikipedia is not the place to root or defend aggressive primitive ideas. Just stop the revisi

15:5915:59, 27 August 2011 diff hist +9‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ It has perfect sense. Jan Dzierzon consider hi9mself a Pole, and at his time Prussian forced using German names. Kotniski start to read the article and my notes on your page. Do not start editor war.
15:5415:54, 27 August 2011 diff hist +600‎ User talk:Kotniski/Archive 7 ‎ Answer for questons. You start editror war

20:5120:51, 26 August 2011 diff hist +179‎ User talk:Kotniski/Archive 7 ‎No edit summary
20:5020:50, 26 August 2011 diff hist +688‎ User talk:Kotniski/Archive 7 ‎No edit summary
20:1620:16, 26 August 2011 diff hist −47‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ OK. Titke of article is Johhan - it should be Jan (Johhan) Dzierzon. We need not repeat Johhan ... Johhan what satisffy revisonists, and Kotinski why you pretend to be part of POlish poject?
15:5515:55, 26 August 2011 diff hist −1‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ Firzt is first. Polish name for Polish person

17:4817:48, 24 August 2011 diff hist +112‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ Kotinski, Please support historical facts and justice instead private "Wikipedia" issues. One who is Pole knows what I say.
15:1015:10, 24 August 2011 diff hist +81‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ HerkusMonte lead by strong nationalistic POV. Probably by Prussian revisionism (see his home page)

15:3515:35, 20 August 2011 diff hist +6‎ Johann Dzierzon ‎ "Johann" is not a Polish name. It is offence to Dr Dzierzon who was/is definitely member of Polish society and heritage. Editors who knows nothing about his live and change names show nationalistic reactionism.

17:5017:50, 19 August 2011 diff hist −14‎ Insect ‎ I do not know about Silkworm but bees are domestic (kept at home) but not domesticated animals. Bees are independent and not accustomed to human control, they are practically wild animal..